Pengembangan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika peserta didik sekolah dasar berorientasi pada berpikir tingkat tinggi
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arends, R. I. (2013). Learning to teach (9th ed.). Copyright © by McGraw-Hill Education.
Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur higher order thinking skills matematika siswa SMA kelas X. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14058
Bayuni, K. H., Candiasa, I. M., & Koyan, I. W. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Matematika dengan Teknik Part-Whole pada Siswa SD Kelas IV Se-Kecamatan Gianyar. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(2), 1–21.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Candiasa, I. M. (2010). Pengujian instrumen penelitian disertai aplikasi Iteman dan Bigsteps. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.
Darminto, B. P. (2013). Improving the Ability of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains Tahun, 1(2), 101–107.
Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2012). Revisi taksonomi Bloom ranah kognitif: kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran , dan asesmen. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 98–117.
Hanifah, N. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) di sekolah dasar. Conference Series, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/crecs/article/view/14286
Johar, R. (2012). Domain Soal PISA untuk Literasi Matematika. Jurnal Peluang, 1(1), 30–41.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktort Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departeman Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Mahirah, B. (2017). Evaluasi belajar peserta didik (siswa). Jurnal Idaarah, I(2), 257–267.
Mardapi, D., Kunaidi, & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala baku. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341.
Ndiung, S., Dantes, N., Ardana, I. M., & Marhaeni, A. (2019). Treffinger Creative Learning Model with RME Principles on Creative Thinking Skill by Considering Numerical Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12344a
Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2013). Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach : Its application and development through the use of a Table of spesifications methodoly. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813476922
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. German: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations final PDF.pdf
Pandra, V., & Mardapi, D. (2017). Development of Mathematics Achievement Test for Third Grade Students at Elementary School in Indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(8), 769–776.
Partnership for 21st Century learning. (2011). P21 Framework Definition. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Retnawati, H. (2017). Validitas dan reliabilitas konstruk skor tes kemampuan calon mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(2), 126–135.
Sari, E. F. P. (2015). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA untuk mengetahui argumentasi siswa di sekolah menengah pertama. 124–147. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id
Setianingsih, R., Sa’dijah, C., & Rahman, A. (2017). Investigating Fifth- Grade Students ’ Construction of Mathematical Knowledge through Classroom Discussion. International Electronic Journal of Matematics Education, 12(3), 383–396.
Simalango, M. M., Darmawijoyo, & Aisyah, N. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal PISA taun 2012 level 4, 5, dan 6 di SMPN 1 Indralaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 43–58.
Sudaryono. (2011). Implementasi Teori Responsi Butir ( Item Response Theory ) pada Penilaian Hasil Belajar Akhir di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(6), 719–732.
Tryanasari, D., Aprilia, S., & Cahya, W. A. (2017). Pembelajaran literasi di SDN Rejosari 1 kecamatan Kawedan kabupaten Magetan. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v7i2.1641
Van De Walle, J. A. (2013). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Development (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Yani, A., Asri, A. F., & Burhan, A. (2013). Analisis tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan fungsi distraktor soal ujian semester ganjil. E-Journal Universitas Sriwijaya, 98–115.
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen peelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23.
Yuwono, A. (2016). Problem solving dalam pembelajaran matematika. Union: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 6–7.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 5030 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i1.6274
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran
![]() | Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran published by UNIVERSITAS PGRI MADIUN.
|