EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DISERTAI FISHBONE DIAGRAM (FD) UNTUK MEMBERDAYAKAN KEMAMPUAN MENGANALISIS

Pinkan Amita Tri Prasasti

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a problem based learning
model accompanied with Fishbone Diagram to empower the ability to analyse. This study
was a quasi-experimental study. The study used a one-group pretest-posttest design. The
population of the study was all students of grade X of Public Senior High School 2
Karanganyar in the academic year of 2013/2014. Sample was taken using cluster random
sampling technique with a sample of 36 students. The instrument used was questionnaire,
observation sheets, interviews, and tests. The ability to analyze data was tested with the
Wilcoxon test and calculated by Ngain. The results showed the effectiveness of PBL module
accompanied with FD, in which it had been successful in increasing the ability to analyse
with a value of Ngainof 0.71 and the result was significance at p = 0.000, making the
ability belong to “high” category. Based on the results of research and hypothesis
testing, it can be concluded that PBL model with FD was effective in empowering the
ability to analyseof the tenth graders of.


Keywords


Problem Based Learning (PBL); Fishbone Diagrams (FD); Ability to analyse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akinaglu, O. & Tandogan, R.O.2007.

The Effect of Problem Based

Active Learning of Student

Academic Achievment, attitude

and Concept Learning. Eurasia

Journal of Mathematics, Science

& Technology Education, vol. 3,

no. 1, hlm. 71-81.

Amir, Tufiq.2010. Inovasi Pendidikan

Melalui Problem Based

Learning. Jakarta: Kencana

Arends, R.I, & Klicher, Ann. 2010.

Teaching for Student Learning

Becoming an Accomplished

Teacher. New York: Taylor &

Francis.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. DasarDasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Bigbee, A.F., Curtiss, J.A., Litwin, L.S.

& Harkin, M.T. 2010. MultiAgency C2 Experiment

Lifecycles: The Collaborative

Experimentation Environment as

a Case Study. The International

C2 Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, hlm. 1-

Dimopoulos, I.D., Stefanos, P & John,

D.P. 2009. Planning Educational

Activities and Teaching

Strategies On Constructing a

Conservation Educational

Module. International Journal of

Environmental & Science

Education, vol. 4, no. 4, hlm.

-364.Pinkan Amita Tri Prasasti: Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning (PBL).

Doggett, A.M. 2005. Root Cause

Analysis: A Framework for

Tool Selection. QMJ,

vol.12, no. 4, hlm. 34-45.

Ergul, E., Simsekli, Y., Calis, S.,

Ozdilek, Z., Gocmencelebi,

S., Sanli, M. 2011. The

Effects Of Inquiry-Based

Science Teaching On

Elementary School

Students’ Science Process

Skills And Science

Attitudes. Bulgarian

International Journal of

Science and Education

Policy (BJSEP),vol. 5, no.

, hlm. 48-52.

Erick de Graaff. & A. Kolmos.

Characteristics of

Problem-Based Learning.

International. Journal.

Enginering Education, vol.

, no. 5, hlm. 657-662.

Haghparast, N., Sedghizadeh, PP.,

Shuler, CF., Ferati, D &

Christersson, C. (2007).

Evaluation of Students and

Faculty Perceptions of the

PBL Curriculum at two

dental schools from a

student perspective: A

Cross-sectional survey’,

European Journal of

Dental Education, vol. 11,

no. 14, hlm. 22.

Hashemi, S.A. 2011. The Use Of

Critical Thinking In Social

Science Textbooks Of High

School: A Field Study Of

Fars Province In Iran

.International Journal of

Instruction, vol. 4, no. 1,

hlm. 64-78.

Hindri, Asmoko. 2012. Teknik Ilustrasi

Masalah-Fishbone Diagram.

Balai Diklat Kepemimpinan,

Pusdiklat Pengembangan SDM,

BPPK: Magelang

Hyerle, D.N. & Larry, A. 2012. Peta

Pemikiran (Thinking Maps).

Jakarta: Permata Puri Media.

Inch, E. S. 2006. Critical thinking and

Comunication: The use of reason

in Argument. 5th Ed. Boston:

Person education, Inc.

Kronberg, J.K & Griffin. 2000. Analysis

Problem A Means to Developing

Student Critical Thinking:

Pushing the Boundaries of

Higher-Oder Thinking. Journal

College Science Teacher, vol. 24,

no. 5, hlm. 348-352.

Lawson. AE. 2007. Science Teaching

and Development Thinking.

California: Wordsworth Pub.Co.

Liliasari. 2000. “Pengembangan

Keterampilan berpikir Kritis

untuk Mepersiapkan Calon Guru

IPA Memasuki Era Globalisasi”.

Makalah Seminar Nasional

Pengembangan Pendidikan

MIPA di Era Globalisasi.

Riduwan. 2004. Metode dan Teknik

Menyusun Tesis. Bandung:

Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian

Pendidikan Pendekatan

Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.

Bandung : Alfabeta.

Tague, N.R. 2005. The Quality Tool Box,

Second Edition. Milwake: ASQ

Quality Press

Thompson, Claudatte . 2011.

Critical Thinking across the

Curriculum: Process over

Output. International

Journal of Humanities and

Social Science, vol. 1, no.

, hlm. 1-7.

Tjalla. 2010. Hubungan Antara

Self-Regulated Leraning

dengan Kemampuan

Memecahkan Masalah.

Artikel fakultas Psikologi

Universitas Gunadarma.

Toharudin, U.2011. Membangun Literasi

Peserta Didik: Bandung

humaniora.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 361 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v5i02.286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Premiere Educandum




Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran indexed by:


Premiere Educandum has ISSN: 2088-5350 (Print) & ISSN: 2528-5173 (Online)

Creative Commons License
Premiere Educandum by E-JOURNAL UNIVERSITAS PGRI MADIUN is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View Premiere Educandum Stats