Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Premiere Educandum: Journal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran focuses on our future by definition and provides a platform for research on the challenges and developments that education will face in the future. Premiere Educandum: Journal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal that publishes original work in all areas of elementary education, serving the community as a broad-scope journal for academic trends and future developments in the field. Premiere Educandum: Journal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran particularly welcomes research with the potential for global impact.

Topics

Premiere Educandum: Journal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran covers a broad range of areas related to education in elementary schools. It will be concerned with both formal and informal education in multiple contexts with a particular focus on students, teachers and parents, their social interactions and the political contexts in which they are embedded. Methodologically, Premiere Educandum: Journal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran will be eclectic, supporting a full range of research methods that address important and significant issues. Specific topics include (but not limited to):

  • early STEM education for elementary school student
  • cooperative learning
  • thinking process
  • distance education
  • educational technology
  • teaching and learning at elementary education

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

KID

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial Note

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

SENASSDRA

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published representing a comprehensive perspective of the field. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Acceptance of a manuscript for publication in the journal carries with it an understanding that the author, when requested, will fulfil an obligation to contribute their expertise to the review of others' manuscripts. Authors who are unwilling to assist with the review of a colleague's paper may in extreme cases find that their manuscripts are no longer welcomed for publication in the Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran.

Initial manuscript evaluation

The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review.

Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.

Type of peer review

This journal employs single blind review, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process.

How the referee is selected

Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.

Referee reports

Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
  • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work
  • Represents an archival advance in science or engineering
  • Has not been published before by the author or by others

Referees are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

How long does the review process take?

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2 months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 2 weeks. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.

Editor's decision is final

Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

 

Publication Frequency

Every issue published at June and December

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...