Scaffolding Sesuai Gaya Belajar Sebagai Usaha Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan proses scaffolding bagi mahasiswa calon guru sesuai gaya belajarnya. Desain penelitian menggunakan kualitatif triangulatif. Subjek penelitian mahasiswa calon guru SD tahun pertama Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana yang berjumlah 24 orang dan sedang mengambil mata kuliah Konsep Dasar Matematika. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, subjek memiliki kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang berbeda dilihat dari gaya belajarnya. Dua aspek kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang masih rendah adalah keluwesan dan kebaruan. Masih kurangnya kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis subjek dikarenakan masih kurangnya kecintaan subjek terhadap matematika. Scaffolding sesuai gaya belajar dapat membantu memperbaiki pola pikir mahasiswa sehingga kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematisnya meningkat. Teknik dan lamanya proses scaffolding bergantung pada gaya belajar dan kemampuan subjek mengikuti proses scaffolding. Proses scaffolding harus dilakukan sesuai respon subjek dan kebutuhan subjek sesuai gaya belajarnya. Meskipun gaya belajar berbeda, proses scaffolding lebih maksimal jika menggunakan media, baik berupa alat peraga maupun simulasi gambar.Â
Downloads
Article Details
Premiere Educandum by E-JOURNAL UNIVERSITAS PGRI MADIUN is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder:Â Â (Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran)
References
Akhtar, M. (2014). Patterns Of Scaffolding in One-to-One Mathematics Teaching: An Analysis. Educational Research International, 3(1), 71-79.
Anne Jelfs, Roberta Nathan & Clive Barrett. (2004, August 06). Scaffolding students: Suggestions on How to Equip Students With the Necessary Study Skills For Studying in A Blended Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Media, 85-96. doi:10.1080/1358165042000253267
Best, B. & Thomas, W. (2007). The Creative Teaching and Learning Toolkit. NewYork: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Bire, A. L, Garadus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 44(2),169-176.
Bikmaz, F.H, et al. Scaffolding Strategies Applied by Student Teachers to Teach Mathematics. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 1. Special Issue. pp. 25-36 ISSN: 1308-951X
Dennen, V. P. (2004). Cognitive Apprenticeship in Educational Practice: Research on Scaffolding, Modeling, Mentoring, and Coaching as Instructional Strategies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 813-828). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DePorter, Bobbi., Mark Reardon, & Sarah Singer-Nourie. (2014). Quantum Teaching. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.
Dyers, J.H. et al. (2011). Innovators DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators, Harvard: Business Review.
Holton, D. & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2): 127-143
Jelfs, A., Nathan, R., & Barrett, C. (2004). Scaffolding students: Suggestions on how to equip students with the necessary skills for studying in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Media, 29(2), 85-95.
Lajoie, S.P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science 33 (5 – 6) : 541 - 557
Lange, V. L. (2002). Instructional scaffolding. Retrieved July 13, 2017 from http://condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/~group4/Cano/Cano%20Paper.doc.
Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H. & Hakkarainen, K. (2005) Patterns of scaffolding in computer-mediated collaborative inquiry. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 13: 2, 281-300
Mann, E.L. (2005). Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical Creativity in Middle School Students. Connecticut: University of Connecticut.
Mairing, J.P. 2016. Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VIII Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Tingkat Akreditasi. Jurnal Kependidikan, Volume 46 (2),179-192
McGregor, D. (2007). Developing Thinking; Developing Learning A Guide to Thinking Skills in education. NewYork: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education
McNeill, K.L., Lizotte, D.J., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students‘ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 15(2): 153–191
Nindiasari, H. dkk. (2016). Desain Didaktis Tahapan Kemampuan Dan Disposisi Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan, Volume 46 (2), 219-232
Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachers and researchers beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168-190.
Ormond, C. A. (2016). Scaffolding the Mathematical “Connectionsâ€: A New Approach to Preparting Teachers for the Teaching of Lower Secondary Algebra. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 122-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n6.8
Sriwongchai, Arunee, Nirat Jantharajit, and Sumalee Chookhampaeng. 2015. “Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Moderl for Improving Creative Thinking in Thailandâ€. International Education Studies, Vol. 8 No. 11
Sternberg. R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies. 63 (2005) 370–382
Sternberg. R. J. (2006).The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. Vol. 18, No. 1, 87–98
Torrance, E. P. (1995). The beyonders’ in why fly? A philosophy of creativity.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Vale, I. & Barbosa, A. 2015. Mathematics Creativity in Elementary Teacher Training. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network. Vol. 10, 101-109
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. . In M.Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman, (Eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press...................................................
Williams, L. (2008). Tiering and scaffolding: Two strategies for providing access to important mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 324-330.