Perbandingan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Menggunakan Model PBL dan Discovery Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i2.15907Keywords:
PBL, DL, Problem SolvingAbstract
This research was motivated by the lack of ability to solve problems and the students were less able to think creatively, be active in the learning process. aims to describe the comparison of mathematical problem solving abilities using the PBL Model with Discovery Learning. This type of research uses factorial design. The sampling technique is probability sampling with proportionate stratified random sampling. The samples in this study were the experimental group I class V SD Negeri 11 Koto Salak using the PBL model and the experimental group II class V SD Negeri 08 Koto Salak using the Discovery Learning model, totaling 16 and 15 students respectively. The research instruments are description tests and questionnaires. The data analysis technique used is the T-test and two-way ANOVA through the normality test and homogeneity test. Based on the research results, problem solving abilities were tested and processed using the T-Test and Two-Way Anova. The results of calculating the differences in students' problem solving abilities using the PBL model with the Discovery Learning model obtained significant results 5. Based on the hypothesis results obtained significant results of 0.000, which means the results sig(0.000) <0.05. The Ha hypothesis is accepted if sig<0.05 and the Ho hypothesis is accepted if sig>0.05. Based on the results of the sig hypothesis Ha is accepted, meaning that there are differences in students' problem-solving abilities in learning mathematics using the PBL model with Discovery Learning. regardless of the child's initial abilities. So, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the ability to solve problems using the PBL model with the Discovery Learning model for Class V Elementary Schools.
Â
Downloads
References
Amalia. (2018). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik dengan Self Efficacy dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(5), 887–894.
Amanata, R., & Taufik, T. (2020). Penerapan Membaca Pemahaman Menggunakan Metode Speed Reading dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. E-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran SD, 8(8), 301–313.
Indra. (2013). KEEFEKTIFAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEMBASED LEARNINGTERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF MATEMATIK. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 49–54.
Indriani, F. (2015). KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK MAHASISWA DALAM MENGELOLA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK INTEGRATIF KURIKULUM 2013 PADA. Jurnal PGSD, 2(2), 87–94.
Kuan-nien. (2011). Integrating Library Instruction Into a Problem Based Learning Curriculum. In Aslib Proceedings.
Kyeong. (2003). Problem-based instruction in mathematics. In ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Labkoly, A., Liunesi, F., Hutagaol, D., Wardhani, P., Hadi, W., Guru, P., Dasar, S., & Jakarta, U. N. (2022). Jurnal Citra Pendidikan ( JCP ) PENGEMBANGAN VIDEO INTERAKTIF BERGAMBAR BERBASIS STRATEGI DIRECTED READING THINKING ACTIVITY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI. 2, 637–642.
Masruroh, V., Lusiana, R., & Susanti, V. D. (2022, August). Analisis keterampilan abad 21 siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal turunan fungsi aljabar ditinjau dari gender. In SEMINAR NASIONAL SOSIAL, SAINS, PENDIDIKAN, HUMANIORA (SENASSDRA) (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 801-807).
Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan T. (2022). Kepmen No 262 Perubahan 56 Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Pemulihan Pembelajaran.
Nafiah. (2014). Penerapan Model Problem-Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan the Application of the Problem-Based Learning Model To Improve the Students Critical Thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 4(2), 125–143.
Nasional, S., Dasar, P., & Negeri, U. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN DESAIN PEMBELAJARAN MEMBACA BERBASIS DRTA SEBAGAI UPAYA MEMBANGUN GENERASI LITERAT ABAD 21 DI KELAS VI SEKOLAH DASAR Faisal 76. 441–455.
Nurjanah. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpiir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 48–56.
Rahmin, S., Andari, T., & Krisdiana, I. (2022). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA ARITMATIKA SOSIAL DITINJAU DARI PENGUASAAN MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA KELAS VII SMP. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Dasar, 3, 1456-1472.
Stephani, M. R. (2017). Stimulasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Pada Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga, 2(1), 16.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015. (2020). PENGARUH KETERAMPILAN MENGAJAR GURU TERHADAP MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII MATA PELAJARAN AKIDAH AKHLAK MTs MA’ARIF NU 21 BATANGHARI LAMPUNG TIMUR. Suparyanto Dan Rosad (2015, 5(3), 248–253.
Yusuf. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan (Pertama). In Jakarta: Renika Cipta.
Yusuf. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Hots Di Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Papua. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 42.
Yuwanita, V. E., Andari, T., & Astuti, I. P. (2022). Analisis tingkat metakognisi siswa dalam memecahkan masalah bangun ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika pada siswa SMP kelas VIII. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Dasar, 3, 1432-1448.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Â
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
