THE REVIVAL OF VIRTUE ETHICS AS AN ETHICAL VIEW

Chris O. Abakare

Abstract


Aristotle and Plato were the chief architects of virtue ethics, but their own formulation of virtue ethics was mostly subdued with the appearance of consequentialism as well as Kantian deontology. However, modem thinkers have attempted to revive virtue ethics in its new form and in this regard the name which is popularly known is G.E.M. Anscombe. In fact Anscombe clearly indicates in what sense virtue ethics can be revived and what was wrong with the traditional virtue ethics as expounded by Aristotle and Plato. Anscombe points out three important issues for which traditional virtue ethics perhaps lost its glory. First, moral philosophy in general cannot survive without an adequate philosophy of psychology and this thing was absent in the traditional virtue ethics. Secondly, without psychological possibility the concepts of moral obligation and moral duty, the moral sense of ought to be jeopardized. Thirdly and importantly, the differences between the well-known English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance. This task of this paper is to review the revival of virtue ethics

Keywords


Virtue ethics; moral obligation; moral duty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abakare, C. (2020). The Origin Of Virtue Ethics: Aristotle’s Views. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 3(1), 98-112.

Allam, O. S. (2018). Unmasking “Alekwu” Religious Experience among the Idoma People-Group of Nigeria. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 1(2), 118-130.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (2011). Human life, action and ethics: essays by GEM Anscombe (Vol. 4). Andrews UK Limited.

Asuquo, O. O. (2019). Humanism as a Category of Religious Alternative. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 2(1), 30-36.

Balsemão Pires, E. (2020). Counselling and Ethical Theories. Acta Europeana Systemica, 8, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.14428/aes.v8i1.56503

Barry, P. (2016). Schizophrenia and the Virtues of Self-Effacement. Les Ateliers de L’éthique, 11(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.7202/1038197ar

Cummiskey, D. (1990). Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics, 100(3), 586–615. https://doi.org/10.1086/293212

Darwall, S. (2013). Honor, history, and relationship: Essays in second-personal ethics II. OUP Oxford.

Edet, F. F. (2019). The concept of worship in Islam. Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 16(4), 125-130.

Gettell, R. G. (2019). The English Utilitarians. In History of Political Thought (pp. 340–355). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270550-21

Giannopoulou, Z. (2011). Plato and the Question of Beauty. Ancient Philosophy, 31(2), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil201131230

Gibbard, A. (1973). Doing no more harm than good. Philosophical Studies, 24(3), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367993

Gruender, H. (1931). Grundlegung der Erkenntnistheorie. Thought: Fordham University Quarterly, 6(1), 125-130.

Harman, G. (1999, January). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian society (pp. 315-331). Aristotelian Society.

Heinzelmann, N. (2018). Deontology defended. Synthese, 195(12), 5197–5216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1762-3

Kubala, R. (2020). Aesthetic obligations. Philosophy Compass, 15(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12712

Okpo, O. (2020). Nigeria’s Traditional Virtue Ethics and Business: An Ibibio Virtue Ethics Approach to Business Ethics. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 3(1), 16-31.

Ramos, S. (2019). Plato and Kant on Beauty and Desire. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche20191010142

Ross, W. D. (2011). Foundations of ethics. Read Books Ltd.

Sasa, M. S. (2019). An Appraisal of the Concept of Beauty in Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 2(2), 87-97.

Scharding, T. (2019). Individual Actions and Corporate Moral Responsibility: A (Reconstituted) Kantian Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3889-z

Singleton, J. (2002). Virtue ethics, Kantian Ethics, and Consequentialism. Journal of Philosophical Research, 27, 536–551. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2002_16


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 487 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/she.v2i2.9331

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


SHE Journal managed and published by Universitas PGRI Madiun (UNIPMA), Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats