Misconception Analysis of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Numeration of High School Students from Field Dependent Cognitive Style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14112Keywords:
Minimum Competency Assessment, Field Dependent Cognitive Style, Misconceptions, NumberAbstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the extent of misunderstandings experienced by high school students while tackling Minimum Numerical Ability (AKM) questions modeled on the basis of domain-dependent cognitive styles. The number of students used as subjects in the study was her XI-IPS students in class three (3). The study was conducted at Tawangsari, Tulungagung District, Kedungwal, MA Darul Hikma, Tulungagung District, Jl KH Abu Mansur I. The study was conducted in even-numbered terms of the academic year 2021-2022. A targeted sampling method with the GEFT test (Group Embedded Figure Test) is used to determine research topics and classify students as having subject-dependent cognitive styles or not (subject-dependent). The results showed that students were categorized based on their AKM numbering test response results of low, medium, and high misconceptions. The number of questions is 3 questions. The first item is used to make sure that the indicator cannot repeat the concept. The second item is used to determine that the indicator fails to formulate the concept correctly in various mathematical representations. The index cannot determine the formula that answers the question. Indicators cannot apply formulas or algorithms to solve problems. The third item is used to see indicators of inability to use formulas or problem-solving algorithms. The results obtained show that subject-specific style students with low misunderstandings score higher from responses to AKM numbering questions than students with moderate and high misunderstandings.
Downloads
References
Abdara, A. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Pengajuan Masalah Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i1.7120
Alphonce, S., & Mwantimwa, K. (2019). Students’ use of digital learning resources: diversity, motivations and challenges. Information and Learning Science, 120(11–12). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0048
Chen, Y. C. (2019). Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance, Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math Course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854036
Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Muhammad, Y. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Adaptive Reasoning Ability in Solving HOTS Problems Arithmetic Sequences and Series in Terms of Learning Style. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1).
Darmayanti, R., Usmyatun, U., Setio, A., Sekaryanti, R., & Safitri, N. D. (2023). Application of Vygotsky Theory in High School Mathematics Learning Material Limit Functions. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 11(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14099
Fernández, E. A., Samacá, L. F., & MartÃn, C. R. (2021). Diagnose, Analysis, and Proposal of Project Based Learning (PBL): A Case for Analog Communications Course. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, 2021-July. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2021.1.1.461
Fitria, R. N., Nabila, R. F., Wardani, M. P., Zalsabella, M. P., Pertiwi, W., & Darmadi, D. (2021). Respon Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Unipma Dalam Memecakan Masalah Geometri Ditinjau Dari Aspek Filsafat Ilmu Selama Perkuliahan Daring. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 4(1), 76-84.
Gozali, I., Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., & Jemadi, F. (2021). HOTS questioning ability and HOTS perception of language teachers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34583
Harahap, Z. I. S., Muchlis, E. E., & Maulidiya, D. (2019). Faktor – Faktor Penyebab Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tentang Luas Permukaan Kubus Dan Balok Kelas Viii Smpn 18 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 3(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.3.3.342-352
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Kemdikbud. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Desain Pengembangan AKM, 1–125.
Kusumaningtyas, S. I., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2017). Pemecahan Masalah Generalisasi Pola Siswa Kelas VII SMP Ditinjuau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i1.6994
Lusiana, R., Suprapto, E., & Sukristini, I. (2021). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ). Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(02), 55-63.
Miles, M. B. , & H. A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif (UI Press). Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru.
Mirlanda, E. P., & Pujiastuti, H. (2018). KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS: ANALISIS BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v3i2.1252
Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Calculus by Undergraduate Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2).
NCTM. (2000). Six Principles for School Mathematics.
Nidia Zuraya. (2012). KH Hisyam, Pelopor Pendidikan Modern Muhammadiyah (3-habis). Republika.Co.Id.
Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi Meningkatkan Kompetensi 4C (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, &Collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810
Rahmah, K., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Ningsih, E. F. (2022). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Based on APOS Theory Viewed from the Type of Kolb Learning Style. INdoMATH: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 5(2), 109–122. https://indomath.org/index.php/
Rahmawati, P., Afreza, I. N., Anshori, M. L., Putri, Q. A., & Lusiana, R. (2021). PELATIHAN BIOENTERPRENEURSHIP BAGI REMAJA PUTUS SEKOLAH DI LOPOSOS DESA SAMBIREJO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN EKONOMI DI SEKTOR INDUSTRI KREATIF. PATIKALA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 16-23.
Ruskhan Fauza, M., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Prasetyo, B., Mariyanto, A., & Lony, A. (2022). Problem Solving Ability: Strategy Analysis of Working Backwards Based on Polya Steps for Middle School Students YALC Pasuruan. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 10(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13338
Schnepper, L. C., & McCoy, L. P. (2013). Analysis of Misconceptions in High School Mathematics. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(1), 625–625. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1066
Sekaryanti, R., Cholily, Y. M., Darmayanti, R., Rahma, K., Prasetyo, B., & Maryanto, A. (2022). Analysis of Written Mathematics Communication Skills in Solving Solo Taxonomy Assisted Problems. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 10(2), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13707
Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838
Sudihartinih, E. (2020). Students’ Mistakes and Misconceptions on the Subject of Conics. International Journal of Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i2.19130
Sugianto, R., Muchamad Cholily, Y., Darmayanti, R., Rahmah, K., & Hasanah, N. (2022). Development of Rainbow Mathematics Card in TGT Learning Model for Increasing Mathematics Communication Ability. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 221–234. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano
Suprapto, E., Setyansah, R. K., & Devina, D. (2021). GeoGebra Application Based Tutorial Materials to Improve Spatial Mathematics Abilities in Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(2), 175-181.
Syaifuddin, M., Darmayanti, R., Rizki, N., Sugianto, R., & Niswatun Hasanah. (2022). High school students’ mathematical representation ability: Evaluation of disposition based on mastery learning assessment model (MLAM). Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–15. https://www.journal.foundae.com/index.php/jasme/index://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
Wooldrdge, B., & Bartolf, M. H. (2006). Field dependence-field independence learning style.pdf. In Learning Styles and Learning (pp. 237–257).
Yuliarisma, S. A., Darmadi, D., Ningrum, P. P., Safitri, A., Prasetyo, Y. E., & Nisa, K. (2021). Peran Orang Tua Dalam Menyeimbangkan Psikologi Anak Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Masa Covid 19. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 4(1), 70-75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Â
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
Â

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.