Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Model Project Based Learning Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP

Authors

  • Ridha Fajria Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Yerizon Yerizon Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Edwin Musdi Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Dony Permana Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i1.11918

Keywords:

Learning Tools, Project Based Learning, STEM, Creative Thinking Ability

Abstract

Learning tools become one of the important things in the learning process that has an impact on the ability of students, especially the ability to think creatively. Learning tools in the form of RPP and LKPD  can create an effective and fun learning process, and can facilitate students' creative thinking skills. Although this creative thinking ability is one of the important abilities and must be mastered by students, there are still many students who find it difficult to solve problems that can encourage the development of students' creative thinking skills, so it is necessary to develop learning tools that can help improve students' abilities. creative thinking of students. Learning according to these characteristics is the STEM integrated Project Based Learning model of mathematics learning. This study aims to design valid, practical and effective learning tools in the form of STEM-PjBL-based RPP and LKPD for Class VIII Junior High School students. The development research was carried out using the Plomp development model. The Plomp development model consists of three stages, namely the preliminary research stage, the development or prototyping stage and the assessment stage. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews and observation sheets. Analysis of the validity data showed that the resulting device was in the very valid category with a RPP validity score of 3.63 and LKPD 3.54. In the analysis of practicality data, it was found that the mathematics learning tools were practical with a practicality score of 82.1% for RPP and LKPD 82%. Learning tools are effective based on learning outcomes where the completeness is 63.02 %. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the STEM-PjBL-based learning tools developed were valid, practical and effective.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman. (2015). Guru Sains Sebagai Inovator : Merancang Pembelajaran Sains Inovatif Berbasis Riset. Yogyakarta : Media Akademi.

Fortus, D., dkk. (2005). Design-based science and Real Woarld problem Solving. International Journal Of Science Education.

Geogre Lucas Educational Foundation. (2005). Instructional Module Project Based Learning. [Online]. Diakses dari htto://www.edutopia.org./modules/pbl/project-based-learning.

Hendriana, Heris., Eti, Rohaeti dan Sumarmo, Utari. 2017. Hard Skill dan Soft Skills Matematika Siswa. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Haerudin. 2011. Penerapan Metode SAVI Dengan Pendekatan Induktif dan Peningkatan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Volume 1 tahun 2011: 287- 291.

Hariyanto, H., & Warsono, W. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Hidayat, A. 2009. Metode Penelitian Keperawatan dan Tekhnik. Analisis Data.Jakarta: Salemba Medika.

Hidayat. 2011. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think-Talk- Write (TTW). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Volume 1 tahun 2011: 272-279.

Johnson, Johnson. 2013. The Way of Thinking: Tingkatkan Cara Berpikir agar Lebih Kreatif, Rasional, dan Kritis. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Jensen, E. 2008. Pembelajaran Berbasis Kemampuan Otak : Cara Baru dalam Pengajaran dan Pelatihan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

King, F.J., Goodson, L., & Rohani,F. 2010. Higher order thingking skills: Definition, Teaching Strategies, Assessment. Diambil pada tanggal 18 Maret 2021, dari http://goo.gl/su233T

Lestari, Witri. 2012. Efektifitas Strategi Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Hasil belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 2(3):170-181.

Munandar, Utami. 2012. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Permendikbud No. 56 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta : Kemendikbud

Plomp, T dan N. Nieveen. 2013. Education Design Research. Enshede: Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Purwaningrum, J. P. (2012). Penerapan Model Wallas untuk Mengidentifikasi Proses Berpikir Kreatif dalam Pengajuan Masalah Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA Materi Pokok Fungsi Komposisi. Prosiding Seminar NasionalMatematika VI. Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, FMIPA UNNES, hlm. 233240.

Risnanosanti. 2009. Penggunaan Pembelajaran Inkuiri dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA di Kota Bengkulu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematikadan Pendidikan Matematika. Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, FMIPA UNY, hlm. 441-452.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Peneitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

Issue

Section

Articles