Development of High School Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability Instruments on Three Dimension Material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14705Keywords:
Test instruments, Mathematical Reasoning Ability, Dimension Three, DevelopmentAbstract
The purpose of this study was to develop an evaluation tool for learning mathematics to measure the mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students. The type of development applied is related to the model developed by Thiagarajan. The study population consists of four schools in Pasuruan City. The sample of this research was class XII SMA YALC Pasuruan. Data collection techniques used mathematical reasoning instruments about three-dimensional material consisting of three descriptive questions. Data analysis uses validity, reliability, discriminatory power and difficulty. The results of this study indicate that the assessment tool measures the mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students which are well developed and feasible so that they can be used.
Downloads
References
Anjarwati, S., Darmayanti, R., & Khoirudin, M. (2023). Development of “Material Gaya†Teaching Materials Based on Creative Science Videos (CSV) for Class VIII Junior High School Students. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 11(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14347
Arisoy, B., & Aybek, B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues*. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021(92). https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical Reasoning in Formal and Everyday Reasoning Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8
Brookman-Byrne, A., Mareschal, D., Tolmie, A. K., & Dumontheil, I. (2019). The Unique Contributions of Verbal Analogical Reasoning and Nonverbal Matrix Reasoning to Science and Maths Problem-Solving in Adolescence. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12212
Casey, B. M., Lombardi, C. M. P., Pollock, A., Fineman, B., & Pezaris, E. (2017). Girls’ Spatial Skills and Arithmetic Strategies in First Grade as Predictors of Fifth-Grade Analytical Math Reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1363044
Choirudin, C., Nyoman, I., Degeng, S., Kuswandi, D., Purnomo, P., & Maba, A. P. (2022). Career readiness among low-income Muslim students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(3), 1400–1406. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22727
Darmayanti, R., Baiduri, B., & Sugianto, R. (2022). Learning Application Derivative Algebraic Functions: Ethnomathematical Studies and Digital Creator Books. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(02), 2212–2227.
Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Muhammad, Y. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Adaptive Reasoning Ability in Solving HOTS Problems Arithmetic Sequences and Series in Terms of Learning Style. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1).
Darmayanti, R., Usmyatun, U., Setio, A., Sekaryanti, R., & Safitri, N. D. (2023). Application of Vygotsky Theory in High School Mathematics Learning Material Limit Functions. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14099
Fauza, M. R., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Prasetyo, B. A. M., & Lony, A. (2022). Problem Solving Ability: Strategy Analysis of Working Backwards Based on Polya Steps for Middle School Students YALC Pasuruan. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 10(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13338
Fouryza, D., Amin, S. M., & Ekawati, R. (2019). Designing lesson plan of integer number operation based on fun and easy math (FEM) approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15514
González, A., Gallego-Sánchez, I., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., & Puertas, M. L. (2021). Characterizing Levels of Reasoning in Graph Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11020
Haryanti, Y. D., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN BERPIKIR KREATIF PADA PENDIDIKAN ABAD 21. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v5i2.1350
Hung, J. C., & Wang, C. C. (2021). Exploring the website object layout of responsive web design: results of eye tracking evaluations. Journal of Supercomputing, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03283-1
Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., & Rizki, N. (2023). Problems, Solutions, and Expectations: 6C Integration of 21 st Century Education into Learning Mathematics. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14646
Kabael, T., & Akin, A. (2018). Prospective middle-school mathematics teachers’ quantitative reasoning and their support for students’ quantitative reasoning. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383126
Li, W., Wang, Q., Chen, Y., Pu, Y., & Xu, G. (2021). Instrument development and validation of the comprehensive ability of older people assessment scale. Nursing Open, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1020
Merona, S. P., & Santi, E. E. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ASESMEN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PADA MATAKULIAH FUNGSI KOMPLEKS. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.4.2.113-122
ND Safitri, R Darmayanti, U Usmiyatun, & D Nurmalitasari. (2023). 21st Century Mathematics Learning Challenges: Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Best Practices in Shinta Indexed Scientific Publications. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 136–152.
Otgonbaatar, K. (2021). Effectiveness of anchoring vignettes in re-evaluating self-rated social and emotional skills in mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20716
Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
Rizki, N., Laila, A. R. N., Inganah, S., & Darmayanti, R. (2022). Analysis of Mathematic Connection Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving Reviewed from Student’s Self-Confidence. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 111–126. http://snastep.um.ac.id/pub/index.php/proceeding/indexKeahliandanPerformaPakardalamTeknologiPendidikanuntuk
Sah, R. W. A., Laila, A. R. N., Setyawati, A., Darmayanti, R., & Nurmalitasari, D. (2023). Misconception Analysis of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Numeration of High School Students from Field Dependent Cognitive Style. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 11(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14112
Samsul, P., & Mutmainnah, M. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Scientific. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v2i1.20
Sekaryanti, R., Cholily, Y. M., Darmayanti, R., Rahma, K., Prasetyo, B., & Maryanto, A. (2022). Analysis of Written Mathematics Communication Skills in Solving Solo Taxonomy Assisted Problems. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 10(2), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13707
Setiana, D. S. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Matematika Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 4(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.17-26
Slovin, H. (2020). Take Time for Action: Moving to Proportional Reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5951/mtms.6.1.0058
Srirahayu, R. R. Y., & Arty, I. S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran Fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.20270
Sterner, G., Wolff, U., & Helenius, O. (2020). Reasoning about Representations: Effects of an Early Math Intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1600579
Sugianto, R., Cholily, Y. M., Darmayanti, R., Rahmah, K., & Hasanah, N. (2022). Development of Rainbow Mathematics Card in TGT Learning Model for Increasing Mathematics Communication Ability. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 221–234. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano
Sumarmo. (2012). Kemampuan dan Disposisi Berpikir Logis, Kritis, dan Kreatif Matematik. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 17–33.
Suwarno, S., & Aeni, C. (2021). PENTINGNYA RUBRIK PENILAIAN DALAM PENGUKURAN KEJUJURAN PESERTA DIDIK. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.31571/edukasi.v19i1.2364
Syaripuddin, Fauzi, A., & Ariswoyo, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa MTS Melalui Pendekatan Metakognitif. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 3(2), 55–64.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. In indiana university, Bloomington, Indiana. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
van der Lee, C., Gatt, A., van Miltenburg, E., & Krahmer, E. (2021). Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines. Computer Speech and Language, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2020.101151
Vidyastuti, A. N., Mahfud Effendi, M., & Darmayanti, R. (2022). Aplikasi Tik-Tok: Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Barisan dan Deret Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa SMA. JMEN: Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 8(2). http://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/matematika
Weruin, U. U. (2017). Reasoning and Legal Argumentation. Junal Konstitusi, 14(2), 374–395.
Wulandari, T., Nurmalitasari, D., Susanto, K., Darmayanti, R., & Choirudin. (2022). Etnomatematika Pada Batik Daun Sirih dan Burung Kepodang Khas Pasuruan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 95–103. http://snastep.um.ac.id/pub/index.php/proceeding/index
Xin, Y. P., Park, J. Y., Tzur, R., & Si, L. (2020). The impact of a conceptual model-based mathematics computer tutor on multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100762
Zamanzadeh, V., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Majd, H. A., Nikanfar, A., & Ghahramanian, A. (2015). Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development. Nursing Practice Today, 1(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please find the rights and licenses in JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will only communicate with the corresponding author.
5. Miscellaneous
JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains)'s editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
Â
Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.
Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a15c9/a15c9e998d11cb44861379dab7cb3a65a275f283" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.