The discourse of digital persuasion: unmasking Aristotelian rhetorical strategies in Harvard's EdX MOOCs
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study looked into how Harvard University's EdX Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) strategically employed the Aristotelian rhetorical aspects of pathos, ethos, and logos to comprehend their digital persuasion methods. It employed content analysis to examine three MOOCs' "about this course" sections: "Rhetoric," "Ancient Masterpieces," and "Pyramids of Giza." After careful examination, the "Rhetoric" MOOC received an impressive high score of 8, indicating a strong dedication to academic rigor in the digital realm. Deliberately incorporating pathos (7) was found to be an effective strategy for emotionally engrossing learners in virtual environments across MOOCs. In addition, Harvard's excellent display of credibility, authority, and ethical appeal in the digital sphere was underlined by consistently high ethos scores (8 for "Rhetoric," 5 for "Ancient," and 6 for "Giza"). The study's findings highlight Harvard's deft application of digital persuasion techniques in EdX MOOCs, demonstrating the university's smooth transition of its prestigious reputation into the digital learning space while adjusting to the changing needs of education, especially in the AI-driven world of today.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Allan, B. (2016). Emerging strategies for supporting student learning: A practical guide for librarians and educators. Facet Publishing.
Annaraud, K., & Singh, D. (2017). Perceptions of hospitality faculty and students of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 29(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2017.1297714
Barnhill, G. M. (2017). Seeing Christ through Hearing the Apocalypse: An Exploration of John’s Use of Ekphrasis in Revelation 1 and 19. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 39(3), 235-257. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0142064X17689986
Borah, P., Ghosh, S., Suk, J., Mini, D. S., & Sun, L. (2023). Feminism not for all? The discourse around White feminism across five social media platforms. Social Media+ Society, 9(3), 20563051231186862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186862
Bourdon, J. (2015). Outrageous, inescapable? Debating historical analogies in the coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Discourse & Communication, 9(4), 407-422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315576835
Chidume, S. N., & Agbo, I. I. (2022). Discourse-rhetorical strategies of Pauline Epistles: Rhetorical situation theory approach to the book of first Thessalonians. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221085589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085589
Davoudi, S., Galland, D., & Stead, D. (2020). Reinventing planning and planners: Ideological decontestations and rhetorical appeals. Planning Theory, 19(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219869386
Diaz Ruiz, C., & Nilsson, T. (2023). Disinformation and echo chambers: how disinformation circulates on social media through identity-driven controversies. Journal of public policy & marketing, 42(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221103852
Engdahl, E., & Gelang, M. (2019). The changing ethos and personae of shop-window mannequins within consumer culture: Expressions of gendered embodiment. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516668228
Evans, B. J., Baker, R. B., & Dee, T. S. (2016). Persistence patterns in massive open online courses (MOOCs). The Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 206-242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777400
Faulkner, S. L. (2019). Shaming as a form of social activism: Autoethnographic stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(6), 555-558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418806608
Feng, H., Song, C., & Li, L. (2023). Moves and Images: A Multimodal Genre Analysis of Web-Based Crowdfunding Proposals. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(4), 311-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519231179959
Harlow, R. M. (2015). Topoi and the reconciliation of expertise: A model for the development of rhetorical commonplaces in public policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.45.1.d
Helman, E., & Switzer, B. (2016). Rhetoric of Logos. ravel Book Shop AG.
Hudha, M. N., Chaeruman, U. A., Aji, S. D., Huda, C., Yusro, A. C., Kumala, F. N., Wartono, W., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Abdullah, A. G. (2018). SPADA: Online learning between universities of PGRI Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences,
Kessler, M., & Marino, F. (2023). Digital multimodal composing in English language teaching. ELT journal, 77(3), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac047
Kundu, A., & Bej, T. (2020). Perceptions of MOOCs among Indian State University students and teachers. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1095-1115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2019-0224
Leonte, F. (2023). Ethos, Logos, and Perspective: Studies in Late Byzantine Rhetoric. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003321583
Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Using metadiscourse to enhance persuasiveness in corporate press releases: a corpus-based study. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211032165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032165
Lowenhaupt, R., Spillane, J. P., & Hallett, T. (2016). Education Policy in Leadership Practice: “Accountability Talk†in Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 26(5), 783-810. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/105268461602600503
Lupton, J. R., & Sherman, D. (2023). Shakespeare and virtue: a handbook. Cambridge University Press.
Mann, B. W. (2018). Rhetoric of online disability activism:# CripTheVote and civic participation. Communication Culture & Critique, 11(4), 604-621. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy030
Munteanu, D. L. (2011). Tragic pathos: Pity and fear in Greek philosophy and tragedy. Cambridge University Press.
O’Dell, N. L., Fredericksen, E., & Peyre, S. (2018). 2358 Expanding our educational reach: Development of a massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2(S1), 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.210
Oh, J. (2024). The “Angry (Digital) Silver†in South Korea: The Rhetoric Around Older Adults’ Digital Media Literacy. The Gerontologist, 64(2), gnad092. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad092
Padilla Rodriguez, B. C., Armellini, A., & Rodriguez Nieto, M. C. (2020). Learner engagement, retention and success: why size matters in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1665503
Parry, D. (2017). “A Divine Kind of Rhetoricâ€: rhetorical strategy and spirit-wrought sincerity in English puritan writing. Christianity & Literature, 67(1), 113-138. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0148333117734162
Säntti, J., Hansen, P., & Saari, A. (2021). Future jamming: Rhetoric of new knowledge in Finnish educational policy texts. Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 859-876. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1478210320985705
Savolainen, R. (2023). Defending and refuting information sources rhetorically: The case of COVID-19 vaccination. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 999-1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221111196
Sneddon, J., Barlow, G., Bradley, S., Brink, A., Chandy, S. J., & Nathwani, D. (2018). Development and impact of a massive open online course (MOOC) for antimicrobial stewardship. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 73(4), 1091-1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx493
Tao, D., Fu, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, T., & Qu, X. (2022). Key characteristics in designing massive open online courses (MOOCs) for user acceptance: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 882-895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1695214
Virani, S. R., Saini, J. R., & Sharma, S. (2023). Adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for blended learning: The Indian educators’ perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1060-1076. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760
Wong, B. T.-m. (2021). A survey on the pedagogical features of language massive open online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-03-2021-0028
Xiong, J., & Zuo, M. (2019). Older adults’ learning motivations in massive open online courses. Educational Gerontology, 45(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1581444
Zhong, S., & Liu, X. (2023). Cultural specificities of online dictionaries for English learners: Evidence from a user survey and a multimodal discourse analysis. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(4), 1740-1763.