Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of Scaffolding-Metacognitive Strategies in Mathematics Learning

Authors

  • Awi Dassa Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Sutamrin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Hisyam Ihsan Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Norma Nasir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • St. Zulaiha Nurhajarurahmah Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v13i1.21329

Keywords:

Scaffolding, Scaffolding-Metacognition, Mathematics Learning

Abstract

Scaffolding-metacognitive is a strategy to help students understand mathematical material, but some teachers do not yet understand the extent to which they can use the metacognitive scaffolding strategy in the learning process. This study aims to determine teachers' perceptions of the implementation of scaffolding-metacognitive strategies in mathematics learning in secondary schools. Scaffolding-metacognitive strategies, combining step-by-step teaching with the development of students' awareness and control of their thinking processes, Scaffolding-metacognitive strategies are an effective approach to improving students' understanding of complex mathematical concepts and critical thinking skills. This study used a qualitative descriptive method and the participants consisted of 15 mathematics teachers from several high schools in Makassar City and Gowa Regency. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and direct observation during the learning process. We used the Miles & Huberman analysis framework to analyze the collected data, namely: (1) data reduction; (2) data interpretation and condensation; (3) verification and drawing conclusions. The results of data analysis showed that 60% of teachers did not understand the scaffolding-metacognitive strategy, teachers mentioned several implementation challenges, such as the difficulty of adapting strategies to students' different abilities and limited time to plan and implement learning. In addition, teachers must estimate students' actual and potential knowledge so that teachers can provide scaffolding according to students' needs. Teachers need further support and training to overcome the challenges they face when implementing scaffolding-metacognitive strategies. This research makes an important contribution to the development of more effective educational policies and teacher training programs to improve the quality of mathematics education in secondary schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agterberg, D. A., Oostdam, R. J., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2022). From speck to story: relating history of mathematics to the cognitive demand level of tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10093-6

An, Y.-J., & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students’ Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(4).

Arican, M. (2019). Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of and Abilities to Differentiate Proportional Relationships from Nonproportional Relationships. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9931-x

Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2021). Fourth-graders’ justifications in early algebra tasks involving a functional relationship. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10036-1

Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. (2020). Students’ identification and expression of relations between variables in linear functions tasks in three curriculum contexts. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1619221

Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x

Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Variation , covariation , and functions : Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456) (Issue January).

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped classroom as a reform-oriented approach to teaching mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5

Chang, B. L., Cromley, J. G., & Tran, N. (2016). Coordinating Multiple Representations in a Reform Calculus Textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1475–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9652-3

Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001

Finesilver, C. (2022). Beyond categories: dynamic qualitative analysis of visuospatial representation in arithmetic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10123-3

Freeman, B., Higgins, K. N., & Horney, M. (2020). How Students Communicate Mathematical Ideas: An Examination of Multimodal Writing Using Digital Technologies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 281–313. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6178

Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y

González-Calero, J. A., Berciano, A., & Arnau, D. (2020). The role of language on the reversal error. A study with bilingual Basque-Spanish students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1681100

Guo, L. (2020). Mediated Metacognitive Engagement in Flipped Learning. International Journal of Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.6.1.33-37

Haryonik, Y., & Bhakti, Y. B. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Lembar Kerja Siswa Dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. MaPan Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2018v6n1a5

Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9694-7

Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818

Jansen, A., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking skills: Descriptions of their students’ thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9099-y

Kosko, K. W. (2020). The multiplicative meaning conveyed by visual representations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60(January), 100800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100800

Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(7), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2

Downloads

Published

09/30/2024

Issue

Section

Articles