Tradition and modernity in silko’s ceremony and naylor’s mama day: an ecocritical approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v11i1.16473Keywords:
Tradition, Modernit, An Ecocritical ApproachAbstract
Ecocriticism is defined as “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment†(Glotfelty, 1996: 18). The culture is the impact of human and their beliefs in how they live and how they benefit the environment.Thus, ambivalence related to the change of the culture characterizes the people (Bhabha, 1998: 12). This study uses ecocriticism approach aiming to answer questions: 1) How is human and nature relationship represented in Silko’s Ceremony and Gloria Naylor’s Mama Day?; and 2) How does the relationship reveal conflict between tradition and modernity? There are underlined points need to emphasize from both novels of Silko’s Ceremony and Gloria Naylor’s Mama Day through ecocriticism approach. The first is humans’ attitudes toward nature can be either nurturing or destructing. The second is the conflict between tradition and modernity which is underlying this study parted into two, mainly the differences of tradition and modernity and the crashes between both cultures which involve humans and their attitudes toward nature. Tradition and modernity – as cultures here are seen as result of human and nature co-existence. The last point is the impacts of tradition and modernity. The notable impacts from cultures as the effect of human and nature correlation are ambivalence and conformity
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Aanand, G. P. (2019, November). Revitalization of Culture: An Eco-Spiritual Study of Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony. A Journal of Composition Theory, XII(XI), 277-285.
Abrams, M. (1999). A Glossary of Literacy Terms. Massachusetts: Heinle&Heinle.
Amin, L. (2015). Ritualism as a Means of Healthcare, Cultural Revival and Leadership Uprighting in Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, XV(I), 21-29.
Bentahar, S., & Guerroudj, N. (2020). Reading Heteropia as a Site of Resistance in Gloria Naylor's Mama Day (1988). AWEJ for Translation and Literary Studies, 4, 95-110. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no1.8
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bowers, Maggie Ann (2004). Magic(al) Realism. New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Duquette, Kelly. “Environmental Colonialismâ€. Scholarblogs. Jan 2020.
to%20alter%20native%20ecosystems.
Frosch, T. R. (2015). Why George Has to Die: Gloria Naylor's Mama Day and the Myth of the Goddess. Journal of Ethnic American Literature(5).
Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism: The New Critical Idiom. London and New York: Routledge.
Gersdorf, C., & Mayer, S. (Eds.). (2006). Nature in Literary and Cultural Studies: Translatic Conversations on Ecocriticism. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gusfield, J. R. (1967, January). Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change. American Journal of Sociology, 72(4), 351-362.
Hall, S., & Gieben, B. (Eds.). (1992). Formations of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hancock, B. (1998). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham: Trent Focus Group.
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & and Windridge, K. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Yorkshire: The NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire and the Humber.
Huggan, Graham. Tiffin, Helen. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals,
Environment. New York: Routledge. 2009.
Kilminster, R., & Varcoe, I. (Eds.). (1996). Culture, Modernity and Revolution: Essays in Honour of Zygmunt Bauman. London: Routledge.
Kumar, J. G. (2015, January - February). Ceremonies of Culture a Study of Leslie Marmon Silko. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 02(1), 103-109.
Locke, T. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Naylor, G. (1993). Mama Day. New York: Vintage Contemporaries.
Silko, L. M. (2006). Ceremony. United States of America: Penguin Classics.
Wolfreys, J., Robbins, R., & Womack, K. (2002). Key Concept in Literary Theory (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wray, A., Trott, K., Bloomer, A., Reay, S., & Butler, C. (1998). Projects in Linguistics: A Practical Guide to Researching Language. Republic of China: Edward Arnold (Publisher).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Â
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
ETJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, ETJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and ETJ to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.Â
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article (please read our repository policy),
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.