The flipped english language learning through microsoft team application: analytical post covid-19 pandemic critical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v11i1.13562Keywords:
Flipped Learning, English Language Learning, Microsoft Team Application, Post Covid-19 PandemicAbstract
Downloads
References
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017–1051.
Andone, D., & Mihaescu, V. (2018). Blending moocs into higher education courses-a case study. 2018 Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 134–136.
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819.
Chen, K., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y., Jenq, C., Chang, Y., Chang, Y., & Chai, P. Y. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a metaâ€analysis. Medical Education, 52(9), 910–924.
Cho, H. J., Zhao, K., Lee, C. R., Runshe, D., & Krousgrill, C. (2021). Active learning through flipped classroom in mechanical engineering: improving students’ perception of learning and performance. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–13.
Clark, R. M., Kaw, A. K., & Braga Gomes, R. (2022). Adaptive learning: Helpful to the flipped classroom in the online environment of COVID? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 517–531.
Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261–293.
Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does flipped learning promote positive emotions in science education? A comparison between traditional and flipped classroom approaches. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(6), pp516-524.
Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2021). How does a flipped classroom course affect the affective domain toward science course? Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 707–719.
JEONG, K.-O. (2017). The use of Moodle to enrich flipped learning for English as a foreign language education. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 95(18).
Jiang, M. Y., Jong, M. S., Lau, W. W., Chai, C., Liu, K. S., & Park, M. (2020). A scoping review on flipped classroom approach in language education: Challenges, implications and an interaction model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–32.
Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535.
Pasaribu, T. A., & Wulandari, M. (2021). EFL TEACHER CANDIDATES’ENGAGEMENT IN MOBILE-ASSISTED FLIPPED CLASSROOM. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 1–18.
Poston, J., Apostel, S., & Richardson, K. (2020). Using microsoft teams to enhance engagement and learning with any class: It’s fun and easy.
Ranjan, R., López, J., Lal, K., Saxena, S., & Ranjan, S. (2021). Adopting a new hybrid force model: A survey during Covid-19 in Indian higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(16), 169–185.
Rehman, R., & Fatima, S. S. (2021). An innovation in Flipped Class Room: A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(1), 131.
RodrÃguez-RodrÃguez, C., Vicente-RodrÃguez, R., Cortés-Moure, G., & León-Pérez, C. (2019). Personalization of Moodle with the integration of most used web technologies in higher education. Iteckne, 16(1), 48–63.
Singh, M., & Nagwade, O. (2018). Massive Online Open Courses (Moocs) and Its Impact on Management Students. PARIDNYA-The MIBM Research Journal, 6(1), 81–91.
Subramaniam, S. R., & Muniandy, B. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom on students’ engagement. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 355–372.
Tütüncü, N., & Aksu, M. (2018). A systematic review of flipped classroom studies in Turkish education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(2), 207–229.
Wilson, W. J., Kelly, L. E., & Haegele, J. A. (2019). Least restrictive environment decision making in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(4), 536–544.
Xie, Z. (2020). An analysis of the integration and reconstruction of micro-class, MOOC and flipped classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(12), 1571–1575.
Yen, T. V. M., & Nhi, N. T. U. (2021). The practice of online English teaching and learning with microsoft teams: From students’ view. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(2), 51–57.
Zainiyati, H. S., Bulan, S., Alhana, R., & Anam, K. (2021). DESIGN FOR LEARNING AL-QUR’AN HADITH MODEL FLIPPED CLASSROOM BASED ON MICROSOFT TEAMS IN MAN IC PASER, INDONESIA. International Journal of Education and Research, 9(1).
Zhao, L., Liu, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: a case of a modern educational technology course. Sustainability, 13(5), 2888.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Â
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
ETJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, ETJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and ETJ to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.Â
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article (please read our repository policy),
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.