Promoting Philosophy for Children (P4C) in teaching Reading

Authors

  • Rizka Safriyani Languages and Literature Education, Postgraduate Programme, The State University of Surabaya, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ali Mustofa The State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v9i2.10948

Keywords:

Philosophy

Abstract

Philosophy for Children is an educational approach that emphasizes philosophical inquiry as a central component of the learning process. Critical thinking is cultivated through the use of reasoned moves to construct arguments. This study aims to look into how fairy tales can teach students about philosophy while also teaching them to read. This qualitative study is based on a case study at one of Surabaya's primary schools. As part of the research, two teachers participated. The data was gathered through interviews and document analysis. The findings showed that the students in the study used their own experiences to speculate and hypothesize about the activities of fictional characters. Implications and suggestions were also made

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rizka Safriyani, Languages and Literature Education, Postgraduate Programme, The State University of Surabaya, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

I am a student of Languages and Literature Education, Postgraduate Programme, The State University of Surabaya, and also the lecturer of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabayarizka.21019@mhs.unesa.ac.id

References

Creswell, W. John, and J. David Creswell. “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative And Mixed Methods Approaches.†Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 53, no. 9, 2018, file:///C:/Users/Harrison/Downloads/John W. Creswell & J. David Creswell - Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2018).pdf%0Afile:///C:/Users/Harrison/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Creswell, Cr.

Falah, Riza Zahriyal. “Landasan Filosofis Pendidikan Perspektif Filsafat Pragmatisme Dan Implikasinya Dalam Metode Pembelajaran.†Jurnal Filsafat, vol. 5, no. 2, 2017, pp. 374–92, http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/elementary/article/download/2993/pdf.

Gillespie, Lorna. A Critical Challenge : 2014, pp. 5–9.

Gregory, Maughn. “Was Ist Philosophie Für Kinder?†Kinder Philosophieren, Hans Seidel Stiftung, 2007, pp. 35–36.

Lipman, Matthew. “Philosophy for Children: Some Assumptions and Implications.†ETHICS IN PROGRESS, vol. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 3–16, doi:10.14746/eip.2011.1.2.

Literacy Rate among the Population. p. http://uis.unesco.org/en/country/id.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.†SAGE Pub, 1994.

Mukarto, et al. Grow With English : Book 6. Erlangga, 2016.

Prasetya, Damar. “Philosophy Education for Children.†Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 3, 2020, pp. 109–14, https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JFI/article/view/24973.

Pusparini, Ririn, et al. “The Implementation of Question-Answer Relationship ( Qar ) Strategy in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text for Tenth Grader of Man Mojokerto the Implementation of Question-Answer Relationship ( Qar ) Strategy in Teaching Reading of Narrative Text for Tenth.†Journal English Education, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–6.

Rahim, Rasda. “Teaching Reading Comprehension Through Question Answer Relationship Strategy To The Second Semester Students of Midwifery College of Andi Makkasau Parepare.†Eduvelop, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020, pp. 37–50, doi:10.31605/eduvelop.v4i1.803.

Scholl, Rosie, et al. Philosophy for Children: Towards Pedagogical Transformation. 2009, doi:10.13140/2.1.4521.8566.

Soraya M. “The Effect of Question-Answer Relationship (QAR) and Think Aloud Strategies on Reading Comprehension Ability.†Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Darussalam-Banda Aceh, no. 231, 2017.

Tian, Shiauping, and Pei Fen Liao. “Philosophy for Children with Learners of English as a Foreign Language.†Journal of Philosophy in Schools, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, pp. 40–58, https://jps.bham.ac.uk/articles/10.21913/jps.v3i1.1299/.

TopolovÄan, Tomislav, and Milan Matijević. “KritiÄno MiÅ¡ljenje Kot Dimenzija KonstruktivistiÄnega UÄenja: Nekatere ZnaÄilnosti UÄencev Predmetne Stopnje Osnovne Å ole Na HrvaÅ¡kem.†Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, 2017, pp. 47–66.

Tyas, Peptia Asrining, and Mega Safitri. “Kinesthetic Learning Style Preferences: A Survey of Indonesian EFL Learners by Gender.†JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), vol. 2, no. 1, 2017, pp. 53–64, doi:10.21070/jees.v2i1.688.

Downloads

Published

13-12-2021

Issue

Section

Articles