Teacher multimodal feedback: Investigating students’ preferences and voices
Abstract
This present study highlights the implementation of teacher multimodal feedback provision in speaking classes, especially students’ preferences and voices after obtaining teacher feedback. Teacher multimodal feedback was implemented in one semester (14 weeks) in two speaking classes with 36 students majoring English Language Department of a university in Malang, Indonesia. A questionnaire using a 4 Likert scale and an open-ended option was distributed to all respondents, and an in-depth interview was conducted with ten of them where five students represented each class. The data which were analyzed quantitatively indicate that students have different preferences in receiving teacher feedback, and they believe that teacher multimodal feedback is beneficial to improve their L2 oral productions. Direct feedback is the type they like most, but interruption is the mode of feedback they hate most. Some indications also suggest that teachers need to construct positive teacher-student social relationships in the classrooms. Some implications are also discussed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Nasseri, Yusra Sulaiman, et al. “Impact of Students-Teacher Relationship on Student’s Learning: A Review of Literature.” International Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, p. 167, doi:10.5958/j.0974-9357.6.1.034.
Alizadeh, Muchtar. “The Impact of Motivation on English Language Learning.” International Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 1, no. 1, 2016, pp. 11–15.
Anjaniputra, Agung Ginanjar. “Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching Speaking To Students At Secondary Level.” Journal of English and Education, vol. 1, no. 2, 2013, pp. 1–8.
Attali, Yigal. “Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers : Application of a Graded Response IRT Model.” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 35, no. 6, 2011, pp. 472–79, doi:10.1177/0146621610381755.
Babaee, Naghmeh. “Motivation in Learning English as a Second Language: A Literature Review.” Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1–7.
Bayat, Mokarrameh, et al. A Teacher ’ s Multimodal Corrective Feedback : no. 2, 2020, pp. 71–88.
Bitchener, John. Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. 2008, pp. 102–18, doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004.
Blake, John. “Genre-Specific Error Detection with Multimodal Feedback.” RELC Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, 2020, pp. 179–87, doi:10.1177/0033688219898282.
Budianto, Suhartawan, et al. “Written Corrective Feedback across Different Levels of Efl Students’ Academic Writing Proficiency: Outcomes and Implications.” Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, pp. 472–85, doi:10.24815/siele.v7i2.16569.
Carless, David. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, 2006, pp. 219–33, doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
Chandler, Jean. “The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2003, pp. 267–96, doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9.
Choi, Seung-Yi, and Shaofeng Li. “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in a Child ESOL Classroom.” RELC Journal, vol. 43, no. 3, 2012, pp. 331–51, doi:10.1177/0033688212463274.
Efrizal, Dedi. “Improving Students ’ Speaking through Communicative Language Teaching Method at Mts Ja-Alhaq , Sentot Ali Basa Islamic Boarding School of Bengkulu , Indonesia Dedi Efrizal State Institute of Islamic Studies ( IAIN ) Bengkulu , Indonesia Abstract A . Intro.” International Journal of Hhmanities and Social Science, vol. 2, no. 20, 2012, pp. 127–34.
Ferris, Dana. “Preparing Teachers to Respond to Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 16, 2007, pp. 165–93, doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.003.
Genç, Gülten. Exploring EFL Learners ’ Perceived Self-Efficacy and Beliefs on English Language Learning. no. 2, 2016.
Gue, Danielle. Is Feedback Pedagogically Correct ? Research Design Issues in Studies of Feedback on Writing. 2007, pp. 40–53, doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001.
Hartshorn, K. James, et al. “Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy.” TESOL QUARTERLY, vol. 44, no. 1, 2010, pp. 84–109, doi:10.5054/tq.2010.213781.
Hershkovitz, Arnon. “The Student-Teacher Relationship in One-to-One Computing Classroom.” Paginás de Educación, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018, pp. 37–66, https://doi.org/10.22235/pe.v11i1.1553.
Ho, Mei-ching. “THE EFFICACY OF ELECTRONIC PEER FEEDBACK : FROM TAIWANESE EFL STUDENTS ’ PERSPECTIVES.” International Journal of Arts & Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, 2012, pp. 423–28.
Kerr, P. “Giving Feedback on Speaking.” Part of Cambridge Papers on ELT Series, no. December, 2017, p. 16, http://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Cambridge-Press_Whitepaper_Feedback_Speaking_2018.pdf.
Kusumaningrum, Shirly Rizki, et al. “The Effect of Different Types of Peer Feedback Provision on EFL Students ’ Writing Performance.” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019.
Lamb, James. “To Boldly Go: Feedback as Digital, Multimodal Dialogue.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 2, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1–17, doi:10.3390/mti2030049.
Lee, Given, and Diane L. Schallert. Meeting in the Margins : Effects of the Teacher – Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course. 2008, pp. 165–82, doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002.
Lewis, Moore. Giving Feedback in Language Classes. 1 st, SEAMEO Regional Langauge Centre, 2002.
Macknish, Cynthia J. “Creating Multimodal Reflections in an IEP Speaking-Listening Course.” TESL Canada Journal, vol. 36, no. 3, 2019, pp. 173–85, doi:10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1326.
Monteiro, Vera, et al. “Creating a Supportive Classroom Environment Through Effective Feedback: Effects on Students’ School Identification and Behavioral Engagement.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 6, no. June, 2021, pp. 1–14, doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.661736.
Navarretta, Costanza, and Magdalena Lis. Multimodal Feedback Expressions in Danish and Polish Spontaneous Conversations. 2011, pp. 55–62.
Oradee, Thanyalak. “Developing Speaking Skills Using Three Communicative Activities (Discussion, Problem-Solving, AndRole-Playing).” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, vol. 2, no. 6, 2013, pp. 533–35, doi:10.7763/ijssh.2012.v2.164.
Petchpraset, Aaroon. “Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning.” US-China Foreign Language, vol. 10, no. 4, 2012, pp. 1112–20.
Raoofi, Saeid, et al. Self-Efficacy in Second / Foreign Language Learning Contexts Self-Efficacy in Second / Foreign Language Learning Contexts. no. September 2012, 2016, doi:10.5539/elt.v5n11p60.
Schneider, Jan, et al. “Enhancing Public Speaking Skills - An Evaluation of the Presentation Trainer in the Wild.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9891 LNCS, 2016, pp. 263–76, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_20.
Shen, Yu-cheng Roscoe. “Comparison Study in College Students Learning English with Self-Efficacy , Self-Directed Learning , Motivation and Learning Activities in Yunnan and Taiwan of China.” International Journal of Learning and Teaching, vol. 3, no. 4, 2017, pp. 315–18, doi:10.18178/ijlt.3.4.315-319.
Smith, Steven R., et al. “A Survey of Psychological Assessment Feedback Practices Steven.” Assessment, 2007, pp. 310–19, doi:10.1177/1073191107302842.
Yusuf, Fazri Nur, et al. “Multimodal Feedback Provision in Improving Pre-Service Teachers’ Competence.” Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 7, no. 2, 2017, p. 1, doi:10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8126.
Zacharias, Nugrahenny T. “Teacher and Student Attitudes toward Teacher Feedback.” RELC Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, 2007, pp. 38–52, doi:10.1177/0033688206076157.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 453 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v9i2.10759
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Teguh Sulistyo, Agus Sholeh, Nara sari
English Teaching Journal: A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education indexed by:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.