MENGEMBANGKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN STRATEGI HEURISTIK DENGAN PENDEKATAN METAKOGNITIF DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR MAHASISWA CALON GURU MATEMATIKA

Authors

  • Yudi Darma Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, IKIP PGRI Pontianak
  • Muhamad Firdaus Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, IKIP PGRI Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v5i1.849

Keywords:

Strategy Heuristic, Metacognitive, Conventional, Independent Learning, Problem Solving Ability

Abstract

This study intends to develop heuristic strategies in learning courses based on statistical data analysis metacognitive approach. This study was a quasi-experimental study with 2 x 3 factorial design. Techniques of data analysis, namely: balance test, test requirements analysis (test for normality and homogeneity test), test research hypotheses using two way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the research results, it was concluded that that: 1) Students are provided with the learning of metacognitive have problem-solving ability is better than the conventional learning; 2) Students who have a high learning independence have problem solving skills better than students who have low learning independence, and students who have moderate learning independence as well as problem solving skills of students who have learning independence high and low; 3) Based on the categories of metacognitive and conventional learning, students who have a higher learning independence acquire mathematical problem solving ability is better than the lower learning independence, while the mathematical problem solving ability of students who have moderate learning independence as well as low learning independence; 4) Based on the category of high-independent learning, students who applied to acquire metacognitive learning mathematical problem solving abilities better than that applied by conventional learning. Based category learning independence medium or low, there is no difference mathematical problem solving ability of students who applied to the metacognitive learning and conventional learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cardelle, M.E. 1995. Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Skills to Student with Low Mathematics Ability. In M.J. Dunkin & N.L. Gage (Eds.), Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies. 8, 109-111. Oxford : Pergamon Press.

Corte, E. de, Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. 1996. Psychology of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, in D.C Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Hand Book of Educational Psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Macmillan

Darma, Yudi. 2012. Efektivitas Strategi Heuristik Dengan Pendekatan Metakog-nitif dan Pendekatan Investigasi Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mate-matika Pada Materi Pokok Barisan dan Deret Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Siswa Kelas XII Madrasah Aliyah di Pontianak. Tesis pada PPS UNS. Surakarta: tidak dipublikasikan.

Garofalo, J. dan Lester F. 1985. Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Gartmann, S. dan Melissa F. 2000. Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving : Helping Students to Ask The Right Questions. Journal The Mathematics Educator Volume 6 Number 1

Goos, et.al. 2000. A Money Problem : A Source of Insight Into Problem Solving Actioan. Queensland : The University of Queensland [online].

Kirkley, J. 2003. Principles for Teaching Problem Solving. Indiana University : Plato Learning.

Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J.A. 1995. The New Source Book for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Elementary School. Boston, London, Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Resto, Virginia: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Polya, George. 1973. How to Solve It – A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (Second edition). New Jersey : Princeton University Press

Schoenfeld, Alan H. 1980. Heuristik in the Classroom, dalam Krulik, S. dan Reys, Robert E. (Eds). Problem Solving in School Mathematics. Virginia : NCTM.

Schoenfeld, A. 1988. When Good Teaching Least to Bad Results: The Disasters of “Well-Taughtâ€Mathematics Courses. Educational Psychologyist. 23, 145-166.

Schoenfeld, A. 1992. Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving. Metacognition, and sense Making in Mathematics. In D.A. grows (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.

Sickafus, Ed. 2004. Heuristics for Solving Technical Problem : Theory, Derivation, Application. Grosse lle : Ntelleck LLC.

Sujadi, Imam. 2011. Implementasi Matema-tika Terhadap Perkembangan Intelek-tual Peserta Didik. Sumbawa: Disampaikan Dalam Seminar Nasional Matematika di STKIP Hamzanwadi Selong.

The Liang Gie. 1983. Cara Belajar yang Efisien. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Downloads

Published

09/01/2016

Issue

Section

Articles