Development of 3N-Oriented TPACK Mathematical Computing E-Modules

Authors

  • Krida Singgih Kuncoro Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa
  • Tri Astuti Arigiyati Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v8i2.5833

Keywords:

descriptive qualitative, TPACK, 3N

Abstract

Technology always develops from time to time and is very closely related to real-life, which is to solve everyday problems. This study aims to describe the design of 3N-oriented TPACK-based mathematical computing modules (niteni, nirokke, nambahi). The method used is descriptive qualitative part of development research. This research resulted in an E-module design. Mathematical Computing E-Module has the following characteristics (1) containing the TPACK concept and 3N teachings that are designed to be attractive, (2) showing the appropriate 3N activities in the lecture process, and (3) inviting students to carry out niteni, nirokke, and nambahi activities during lesson. The design of 3N-Oriented TPACK based on Mathematical Computing E-Modules is declared valid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset (Vol. 27).

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, Cet. Ke-13.

Gorbi Irawan, A., nyoman Padmadewi, N., & Putu Artini, L. (2018). Instructional materials development through 4D model. SHS Web of Conferences, 42, 00086. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200086

Lestari, I. D. (2018). Peranan Guru Dalam Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Information And Communication Technology (ICT) Di SDN RRI Cisalak. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 3(2).

Mairisiska, T., Sutrisno, S., & Asrial, A. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat pembelajaran Berbasis TPACK pada Materi Sifat Koligatif larutan untuk Meningkatkan keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Jember, 3(1).

Malik, S., Rohendi, D., & Widiaty, I. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) with Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Integration: A Literature Review. 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018). Atlantis Press.

Maor, D. (2013). Does the use of the tpack model enhance digital pedagogies: We don’t understand the present so how can we imagine the future? 30th Annual Conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE 2013, 531–540.

McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123, 26–40.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Mithas, S., & Rust, R. T. (2016). How Information Technology Strategy and Investments Influence Firm Performance: Conjecture and Empirical Evidence1. Mis Quarterly, 40(1).

Mulyono, M. (2018). Keefektifan Metode Problem Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Fiqih di Perguruan Tinggi. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(2).

Novtiar, C., & Fitrianna, A. Y. (2019). Development of innovative teaching and learning module in linear algebra course assisted by Maple. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012050

Ogata, K. (2007). Matlab for control engineers. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Peniati, E. (2012). Pengembangan modul mata kuliah strategi belajar mengajar IPA berbasis hasil penelitian pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1).

Rahayu, I., Purnami, A. S., & Agustito, D. (2018). Penerapan Konsep 3N (Niteni, Nirokke, Nambahi) untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia.

Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67–80.

Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., Sulthoni, & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i16.10633

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Susilowati, E., & Indriyanti, N. (2010). Pengembangan Modul. Diberikan Dalam Pelatihan Pembuatan E-Module Bagi Guru-Guru IPA Biologi SMP Se-Kota Surakarta MenujuOpen Education Resources. Pada Tanggal, 7.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education.

Downloads

Published

03/23/2020

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by "Copyright Transfer Agreement" prior to the article publication.

Creative Commons License
JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) by http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/JIPM is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Â