Development of Test Instruments Based on Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to Measure the Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.5638

Keywords:

Development, Test Instrument, Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, HOTS.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) the appropriateness of the comparative material test instrument based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy to measure HOTS student; (2) the quality of the comparative material test instrument based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy to measure HOTS student; and (3) analysis of potential effects on the use of test instruments for comparison material based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy to measure HOTS students'developed. This research is development research with the Tessmer model development design. The subjects of this research were all students of class VIII SMP Koperasi Pontianak. The research data was obtained based on the expert's / expert's assessment of the test instrument, the results of the test small group which will be analyzed in terms of validity, difficulty index, distinguishing power, and item reliability, as well as the results of the tests field test which will be analyzed related to potential effects. The results showed that: (1) the feasibility of the comparative material test instrument based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy to measure HOTS students'reached the valid criteria level; (2) the quality of the comparative material test instrument based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy to measure the HOTS of students reaching the criteria level is valid, difficult, has poor distinguishing power, and is declared to have low feasibility as a research instrument; (3) analysis of potential effects on the use of test instruments for comparison material based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy to measure HOTS to student achieve an effectiveness level of 68.96% with the criteria for positive potential effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Anderson, & Kratwohl. (2010). Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran Pengajaran dan Asesmen (Cetakan ke-1). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Arifin, Z. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Giani, Zulkardi, & Hiltrimatrin, C. (2012). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal-Soal Buku TeksMatematika Kelas VII Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 66, 37–39.

Hidayati, N. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Topik Energi Dalam Sistem Kehidupan Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 2(2), 389. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v2i2.3283

Jihad, A., & Haris, A. (2010). Evaluasi Pemebelajaran. Jakarta: Multi Press.

Mulyadi. (2010). Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama di Sekolah. Malang: UINMALIKI Press.

Nursalam, N. (2016). Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Matematika: Studi Pada Siswa Sd/Mi Di Kota Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2016v19n1a1

Oktaviana, D., & Prihatin, I. (2018). Analisis Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Perbandingan Berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2:), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.36456/buana_matematika.8.2:.1732.81-88

Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudijono, A. (2009). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Tiro, A. M. (2010). Cara Efektif Belajar Matematika (Cetakan 1). Makassar: Andira Publisher.

Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. (n.d.). Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Downloads

Published

09/14/2020

Issue

Section

Articles