Beginner Teacher's Perception of Application of Project-Based Learning in Mathematics Learning

Authors

  • Muhamad Ikhsan Sahal Guntur Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Heri Retnawati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v8i2.5048

Keywords:

Project-Based Learning, Beginner Teacher, Perception

Abstract

This research aims to describe the teacher's perception of the application of project-based learning in mathematics learning and how they will apply it using a qualitative case study method. The research subjects in this study amounted to 12 students consisting of 3 men and 9 women, where they were students of post-graduate mathematics education study programs at Yogyakarta State University who were beginner teachers where they had taught between 1 and 3 years. Data collection using interviews with open questions to provoke written perceptions of respondents to the project-based learning approach. The time of the study was carried out starting from December 1, 2018, to January 2, 2019, located at Yogyakarta State University. The data analysis techniques applied in this study are Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen models. The results of this study indicate that: (1) respondents have a good perception of the project-based learning approach, (2) the majority of respondents are interested in using a project-based learning approach after they complete their studies (3) all respondents believe they will find obstacles when applying project-based learning approach later (4) the majority of respondents have less knowledge and experience regarding the project-based learning approach. (5) the need for training and further discussion of the project-based learning approach to the research subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alacapinar, F. (2008). Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning Eurasian. Journal of Educational Research, 32(17–34). https://doi.org/http://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.044

Baysura, O.D., Altun, S. & Yucel-Toy, B. (n.d.). Perceptions of teacher candidates regarding project-based learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62(15–36). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.3.

Bell, F. H. (1981). Teaching and learning mathematics (In Secondary School),. Iowa: W.M.C.Brown Company.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. . (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dedy, M. (2001). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Erdem, E., & Demirel, Ö. (2002). Constructivism in curriculum development. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi.

Gultekin, M. (2007). The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in the fifth-grade science education. Elementary Education, 6(1), 93–112. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol6say1/v6s1m8.pdf

Guntur, M. I. S. (2015). Persepsi guru matematika sma di kayuagung terhadap kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(pendidikan matematika), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.9.1.2134.68 - 77

Haller, M., Billinghurst, M., & Thomas, B. H. (2007). Emerging Technologies of Augmented Reality: Interfaces and Design. London: Idea Group Publishing.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (2007). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. ,. Health Services Research, 34.(5), 1189–1208.

Permendikbud. (2010). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 27 Tahun 2010 Tentang Program Induksi Bagi Guru Pemula.

Rafi, I., Yogyakarta, U. N., Retnawati, H., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2018). What are the common errors made by students in solving logarithm What are the common errors made by students in solving logarithm problems ?, (September). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012157

Retnawati, H. (2017). Learning trajectory of item response theory course using multiple softwares. Olympiads in Informatics, 11, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2017.10

Ruangrit, N. (2008). Collaborative Project-Based Learning and Blended Learning According to the Principle of Edutainment of Participant The APEC Edutainment Exchange Program. Jurnal ICT, 1(3).

Sarwono, & Sarilto.W. (2012). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Tertemiz, N. (2012). The effects of project- and activity-supported practiceson mathematics education achievement and student views. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (46), 159–178.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

03/20/2020

Issue

Section

Articles