Analisis faktor konfirmatori sebagai prosedur evaluasi konstruk skala kematangan karir

Authors

  • Wahyu 'Widyatmoko Pascasarjana Bimbingan dan Konseling, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
  • Yulia Ayriza Pascasarjana Bimbingan dan Konseling, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
  • Riszal Purwandika Pascasarjana Bimbingan dan Konseling, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/counsellia.v9i1.3689

Keywords:

kematangan karir

Abstract

Artikel ini bermaksud mengevaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas skala kematangan karir. Skala kematangan karir dirancang untuk mengumpulkan data penelitian tentang tingkat kematangan karir pada siswa SMA. Skala tersebut terdiri dari 12 item pernyataan yang disesuaikan dengan konstruk kematangan karir, yakni: kepercayaan diri dalam karir (KDK), ketidakpastian pilihan karir (KPK), dan pengetahuan terhadap karir (PTK). Hasil analisis faktor konfirmatori mengindikasikan tiga konstruk model cocok (p-vales= 0.50; RMSEA= 0.00; NFI= 0.99; CFI=1.00; GFI=0.99; AGFI=0.98). Selanjutnya, 7 dari 12 item pernyataan skala kematangan karir terbukti valid (stadardized loading berkisar antara 0.52 hingga 0.72; t-values berkisar antara 8.08 hingga 12.25) dan dua dari tiga konstruk skala kematangan karir reliabel (KPK=0.68; PTK=0.70). Hal tersebut menunjukan bahwa skala kematangan karir masih dapat digunakan sebagai instrumen pengumpul data dan alat asesmen.

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the career maturity scale. The career maturity scale is designed to collect research data on the level of career maturity in high school students. It is consists of 12 statement items tailored to the constructs of career maturity: career confidence, uncertainty of career choice, and career knowledge. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the three constructs of model was well fit (p-vales= 0.50; RMSEA= 0.00; NFI= 0.99; CFI=1.00; GFI=0.99; AGFI=0.98). Further, seven out of 12 statement items on career maturity scale proved valid (standardized loading ranged from 0.52 to 0.72; t-values ranged from 8.08 to 12.25) and two of the three constructs of career maturity scale are reliable (KPK=0.68; PTK=0.70). This shows that the scale of career maturity can still be used as an instrument for data collection and assessment tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azwar, S. (2011). Reliabilitas Dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.13381

Babarović, T., & Šverko, I. (2018). The Validity of Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire in Croatia. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717748960

Batubara, J. (2013). Perkembangan dan Pemilihan Karier Menurut Ginzberg dan Implikasinya terhadap Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 1, 43–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/1800

Chartrand, J. M., Robbins, S. B., Morrill, W. H., & Boggs, K. (1990). Development and validation of the Career Factors Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 491–501. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0167.37.4.491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.37.4.491

Crites, J. O. (1965). Measurement of vocational maturity in adolescence: I. Attitude test of the Vocational Development Inventory. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, 1–34. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0093875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093875

Davis, T. E. (2017). School Counseling. In D. Capuzzi & D. R. Gross (Eds.), Introduction to the Counseling Profession: Seventh Edition (seventh, pp. 410–432). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537061-18

Dimitrov, D. M. (2012). Statistical Methods for Validation of Assessment Scale Data in Counseling and Related Fields. Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

Dybwad, T. (2008). The structural validity of daidalos: A measure of career maturity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830801915762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830801915762

Ferrari, L., Nota, L., Schultheiss, D. E., Stead, G. B., & Davis, B. L. (2017). Validation of the Childhood Career Development Scale Among Italian Middle School Students. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717727483

Gati, I., Krausz, M., & Osipow, S. (1996). A Taxonomy of Difficulties in Career Decision Making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.43.4.510

Gati, I., Landman, S., Davidovitch, S., Asulin-Peretz, L., & Gadassi, R. (2010). From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.11.001

Ghozali, I., & Fuad. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi dengan Program Lisrel 9.10. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Gysbers, N. C., Heppner, M. J., & Johnston, J. A. (2014). CAREER COUNSELING: Holism, Diversity, and Strengths (4th ed.). Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

Harrington, T., & Long, J. (2013). The History of Interest Inventories and Career Assessments in Career Counseling. The Career Development Quarterly, 61(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00039.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00039.x

Hartung, P. J. (2013). The Life-Span, Life-Space Theory of Careers. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling : putting theory and research to work (Second Edi, pp. 83–114). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hendryadi, & Suryani. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.80: Pedoman untuk Pemula. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Diapantara.

Hidayati, R. (2015). LAYANAN INFORMASI KARIR MEMBANTU PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN KARIR. JURNAL KONSELING GUSJIGANG, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/jkg.v1i1.258

Jr., J. F. H., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & E. Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice: Principles, Advances, and Applications. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347

Kidd, J. M. (2006). Understanding Career Counselling Theory, Research and Practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Lestari, I. (2017). MENINGKATKAN KEMATANGAN KARIR REMAJA MELALUI BIMBINGAN KARIR BERBASIS LIFE SKILLS. JURNAL KONSELING GUSJIGANG, 3(1), 17–27.

Mau, W.-C. J. (2008). Career Development Interventions in Schools. In H. L. K. Coleman & C. Yeh (Eds.), Handbook of School Counseling (pp. 497–516). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

McIlveen, P., Burton, L. J., & Beccaria, G. (2013). A Short Form of the Career Futures Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712450493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712450493

Mvududu, N. H., & Sink, C. A. (2013). Factor Analysis in Counseling Research and Practice. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137813494766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137813494766

Neukrug, E. (2012). The World of the Counselor An Introduction to the Counseling Profession (4th ed.). Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

Park, C. J., Rottinghaus, P. J., Wang, Z., Zhang, T., Falk, N. A., & Ko, S.-J. (2018). Measurement Invariance of the Career Futures Inventory–Revised Across General and Client Samples. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718816514

Presti, A. Lo, Pace, F., Cascio, V. Lo, & Capuano, M. (2014). The Italian Version of the Career Factors Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(2), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565857

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometri). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Rottinghaus, P. J., Buelow, K. L., Matyja, A., & Schneider, M. R. (2012). The Career Futures Inventory–Revised: Measuring Dimensions of Career Adaptability. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711420849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711420849

Rottinghaus, P. J., Day, S. X., & Borgen, F. H. (2005). The Career Futures Inventory: A Measure of Career-Related Adaptability and Optimism. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704270271

Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2011). Revision of the Career Maturity Inventory: The Adaptability Form. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(4), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711409342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711409342

Savickas, M. L., Porfeli, E. J., Hilton, T. L., & Savickas, S. (2018). The Student Career Construction Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 138–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.009

Sofyan, A., Yusuf, A. M., & Daharmis. (2016). Tingkat Aspirasi Karir Siswa di Tinjau dari Jenis Kelamin, Jurusan dan Daerah Tempat Tinggal. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan.

Stead, G. B., & Schultheiss, D. E. P. (2003). Construction and Psychometric Properties of the Childhood Career Development Scale. South African Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630303300405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630303300405

Stead, G. B., & Schultheiss, D. E. P. (2010). Validity of Childhood Career Development Scale Scores in South Africa. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance2, 10, 73–88. https://doi.org/http://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s10775-010-9175-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-010-9175-y

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tien, H.-L. S. (2001). Career Decision-Making Difficulties Perceived by College Students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 33.

Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in Practice Getting Started with a SIMPLIS Approach. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18044-6

Widoyoko, E. P. (2017). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-20

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

In order to be accepted and published by Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, the author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript the author(s) agreed to the following terms:

  1. The copyright of received articles shall be assigned to Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling. The intended copyright includes the right to publish articles in various forms (including reprints). Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.

  2. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling with an acknowledgement of initial publication to this journal.

  3. Author sent the copyright transfer form (here) to the journal.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.