E-modul berbasis process oriented guided inquiry learning untuk peningkatan critical thinking

Herlinatus Sholehah; Nurul Umamah; M Marjono; S Sumardi; Riza Afita Surya

doi:10.25273/ajsp.v13i2.14404

E-modul berbasis process oriented guided inquiry learning untuk peningkatan critical thinking

Herlinatus Sholehah, Nurul Umamah, M Marjono, S Sumardi, Riza Afita Surya

Abstract

Paradigma pembelajaran berubah sangat cepat seiring dengan adanya transformasi digital di era RI 4.0. Perubahan ini mengharuskan pendidik berinovasi untuk menerapkan pembelajaran yang menyenangkan, memotivasi dan menarik minat peserta didik yang merupakan gen-Z. Pembelajaran berfokus pada proses pemecahan masalah, guna mengembangkan keterampilan 4C skills peserta didik. Critical thinking skills peserta didik merupakan salah satu keterampilan 4C yang menjadi salah satu capaian belajar sejarah dalam kurikulum merdeka. Namun berdasarkan observasi di sekolah 48,8% CTS peserta didik kategori rendah. Berdasarkan hasil observasi tersebut dilakukan analisis kebutuhan untuk menemukan solusi pemecahan masalah. Produk pemecah masalah dalam penelitian pengembangan ini berupa e-modul berbasis process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL). Model penelitian dan pengembangan menggunakan 4D. E-modul berbasis POGIL yang dihasilkan telah tervalidasi ahli dan dinyatakan layak digunakan. Kelayakan e-modul berbasis POGIL dapat dilihat dari hasil validasi ahli isi bidang studi mencapai persentase 75,7% dengan kualifikasi baik, validasi ahli bahasa mencapai persentase 90% dengan kualifikasi sangat baik dan validasi ahli media mencapai 83,6% dengan kualifikasi baik. E-modul berbasis POGIL mampu meningkatkan critical thinking skills peserta didik sebesar 77,2% dengan kualifikasi tinggi. Kesimpulannya telah tervalidasi ahli dan direkomendasikan layak untuk digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran serta dapat meningkatkan CTS peserta didik.

Keywords

e-modul; guided inquiry; critical thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aiman, U., & Hasyda, S. (2020). The Influence of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model Assisted by Realia Media to Improve Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skill of Primary School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635-1647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1635

Al-Harbi, S. S. (2020). Language development and acquisition in early childhood. Journal of education and learning (Edulearn), 14(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.15923

Andrews, R. (2015). Critical thinking and/or argumentation in higher education. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 49-62). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_3

Artuz, J. K. A., & Roble, D. B. (2021). Developing students’ critical thinking skills in mathematics using online-process oriented guided inquiry learning (O-POGIL). American Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-7-2

Bonekamp, L., & Sure, M. (2015). Consequences of Industry 4.0 on human labour and work organisation. Journal of business and media Psychology, 6(1), 33-40. https://journal-bmp.de/wp-content/uploads/04_Bonekamp-Sure_final.pdf

Cevik, M. (2019). Multidimensional 21st Century Skills Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i1.3506

Cirik, İ., Colak, E., & Kaya, D. (2015). Constructivist learning environments: the teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(2), 30-44. www.ijonte.org

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8 ed.). Routledge.

Conradty, C., Sotiriou, S. A., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). How creativity in STEAM modules intervenes with self-efficacy and motivation. Education Sciences, 10(3), 70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030070

De Gale, S., & Boisselle, L. N. (2015). The Effect of POGIL on Academic Performance and Academic Confidence. Science Education International, 26(1), 56-79. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056455

de Leon-Abao, E., Boholano, H. B., & Dayagbil, F. T. (2015). Engagement to social networking: Challenges and opportunities to educators. European Scientific Journal, 11(16). https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5862

Enke, J., Kraft, K., & Metternich, J. (2015). Competency-oriented design of learning modules. Procedia CiRp, 32, 7-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.211

Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of cooperative learning supported by reflective thinking activities on students’ critical thinking skills. Eurasian journal of educational research, 19(80), 89-112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.5

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment, 1(1), 1-23.

Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2020). PBLPOE: A Learning Model to Enhance Students' Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1327a

Ghani, E. K., & Muhammad, K. (2019). Industry 4.0: Employers' Expectations of Accounting Graduates and Its Implications on Teaching and Learning Practices. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.71.19.29

Giunta, C. (2017). An emerging awareness of generation Z students for higher education professors. Archives of Business Research, 5(4), 90-104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.54.2962

Hanson, D. (2014). Instructor’s Guide to Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest; 2006. Pacific Crest.

Hew, K. F., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2018). Understanding student engagement in large-scale open online courses: A machine learning facilitated analysis of student’s reflections in 18 highly rated MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3596

Imansari, A., Umamah, N., & Na’im, M. (2019). The usage of e-book as learning media through the sigil application in history. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ICEGE 2018.

Karatas, K., & Zeybek, G. (2020). The Role of the Academic Field in the Relationship between Self-Directed Learning and 21st Century Skills. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 33-52. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1281054.pdf

Kurt, R. (2019). Industry 4.0 in terms of industrial relations and its impacts on labour life. Procedia computer science, 158, 590-601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.093

Lapawi, N., & Husnin, H. (2020). The effect of computational thinking module on achievement in scienceonal thinking modules on achievement in science. Science Education International, 31(2), 164-171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.5

Long, C. Y., Balakrishnan, B., Ying, C. P., & Yan, K. Y. (2020). Effectivness of Creative Thinking Module on Figural Creativity of Engineering Undergraduate in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 233-243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p233

McIntyre, T., Wegener, M., & McGrath, D. (2018). Dynamic e-learning modules for student lecture preparation. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 6(1), 126-145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.11

Memah, R. A., Gugule, S., & Gumolung, D. (2020). The Effect of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Acid Bases Titration Material in SMA Negeri 1 Kakas, Minahasa Regency. Oxygenius Journal Of Chemistry Education, 2(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v2i1.140

Nasional, D. P. (2017). Panduan praktis penyusunan E-modul tahun 2017. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Putri, V. W., & Gazali, F. (2021). Studi Literatur Model Pembelajaran POGIL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Kimia. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v3i2.363

Rifqi, A., Rochmad, R., & Suyitno, H. (2021). Critical thinking skills reviewed from logical-mathematical and musical intelligence on process oriented guided inquiry learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(A), 175-183. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/37072

Safitri, D., Irmawanty, I., Bachtiar, S., & Rukman, W. Y. (2018). STUDENTS’COGNITIVE ACHIEVEMENT, CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS, AND METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS IN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(4), 248-258. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2067

Sanalan, V. A., & Taslibeyaz, E. (2020). Discovering Turkish Generation-Z in the Context of Educational Technology. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i2.17552

Sipayung, D. H., Sani, R. A., & Bunawan, H. (2018). Collaborative inquiry for 4C skills. 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018), UNIMED.

Sopacua, J., Fadli, M. R., & Rochmat, S. (2020). The history learning module integrated character values. Journal of education and learning (Edulearn), 14(3), 463-472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.16139

Sumardi, L., Rohman, A., & Wahyudiati, D. (2020). Does the Teaching and Learning Process in Primary Schools Correspond to the Characteristics of the 21st Century Learning? International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 357-370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13325a

Syam, A. T., & Furwana, D. (2022). The 4-D Model on the Development of English Learning Materials for Islamic Education Learners. Dinamika Ilmu, 22(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.21093/di.v22i1.4235

Tamrongkunanan, T., & Tanitteerapan, T. (2020). Development of Required Knowledge and Skills among Students through Applied Learning Modules. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 695-714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13443a

Tarbutton, T. (2018). Leveraging 21st Century Learning & Technology to Create Caring Diverse Classroom Cultures. Multicultural Education, 25(2), 4-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181567

Tawfik, A. A., Giabbanelli, P. J., Hogan, M., Msilu, F., Gill, A., & York, C. S. (2018). Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers & Education, 118, 120-132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.013

Umamah, N., & Hartono, F. (2020). Teacher Perspective: Innovative, Adaptive, and Responsive Instructional Design Aimed at Life Skills. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ICEGE 2019.

Umamah, N., & Ma’rifatullah, R. (2020). Need assessment and performance analysis on innovative, adaptive, and responsive curriculum development geared to Life skills. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ICEGE 2019.

Umamah, N., & Sholehah, H. (2022). The Pogil Learning Model and Students' Critical Thinking Improvement in History Subject. Pancaran Pendidikan, 11(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v11i3.420

Umami, R., Umamah, N., SUMARDI, S., & SURYA, R. A. (2021). Development of Historical Learning E-Module Based Value Clarification Technique (Vct). https://repository.unej.ac.id/. Retrieved 6 Juli 2023 from https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/111802

Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., & Qureshi, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences in a modified process-oriented guided inquiry learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 340-352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00233A

Wetchasit, K., Sirisuthi, C., & Agsornsua, P. A. (2020). Strategies for the 21st Learning Skills Development of Students in Schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. International Education Studies, 13(10), 139-147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n10p139