The Representation of Politeness in EFL Clasroom: An Investigation of Language Used by Lectures and Students in STKIP PGRI Bangkalan

Authors

  • Maimuna Maimuna STKIP PGRI Bangkalan
  • Chairuddin Chairuddin STKIP PGRI Bangkalan
  • Siti Maria Ulfa STKIP PGRI Bangkalan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v9i1.8820

Keywords:

politeness, politeness principle, politeness strategy

Abstract

Politeness is a person's politeness in speaking, so that between the speaker and the listener do not feel threatened (offended) in politeness, there are two opinions namely the politeness strategy and the politeness principle. Both are the same, only differ in classifying. Politeness strategy consists of off record, on record,  negative politeness and positive politeness. The politeness principle, consist of the tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, sympathty maxim and agreement maxim. This study examined conversations between lecturers and students. The samples of this research were from screenshot of the teaching-learning conversation between lecturers and students via whatsapp. Collecting the data, analyzing and classifying were conducted word by word. The results of this study were students and lecturers often used language clearly and to the point, which is included on the record, namely using the sentence directly and also they used politeness priciple

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, M. Y. (2020). The use of “define it!†game in teaching descriptive speaking. SELL Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(1), 40-46.

Afifi, M. (2007). Gender Differences in Mental Health. GoogleSchoolar, 7.

Aji, B. P. (2014). The Use of Swear Words in "Four Brothers" Movie . Surabaya: Faculty of Letters and Humanities State Islamic University UIN Sunan Ampel.

Andersen, R. &. (2018). Simplexity, languages and human languaging. Elselvier, 9-7.

Ary, D. (2010). Intriduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth.

Ary, D. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research Fourth Edition Sage. London: Sage.

Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Rsearch Fourh Ediition Sage. London: Sage.

Guvendir, E. (2015). Why Are Males Inclined to Use Strong Swear Words More than Females? An Evolutionary Explanation Based on Male Intergroup Aggressiveness. ScienceDirect, 7.

Hajid, I. (2020). Diambil kembali dari http://www.hajij.com/id/the-noble-quran/item/762-tafsir-al-quran-surat-an-nisaa-ayat-86-88-

Holmes, J. (2008). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. England: Sustainable Forests.

Hudson, R. A. (2018, 12 13). Sociolinguistics. Diambil kembali dari Google: www.beck-shope.de

J.J.BradacS.A.Reid. (2006). Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics.

Jay, T. (2009). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. SAGE Journals, 9.

Jendra, I. I. (2010). Sociolinguistics The Study of Societies Languages. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Joseph, B. D. (2015). Language Contact. Elsevier, 7.

KURNIAWATI, O. (2012). Analisis Pemanfaatan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa pada Kegiatan Diskusi Kelas XI SMA N 1 Sleman. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakartar.

Malyuga, E. N., & Orlova, S. N. (2017). Linguistic Pragmatics of Intercultural Professional and Business Communication. Springer.

Masaki, Y. (2004, 12 13). Critique of J. L. Austin Speech Act Theory. Diambil kembali dari Google: www.caj1971.com

Meyer, C. F. (2009). Dalam Introducing English Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge.

Morris, M. (2007). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Popusoi, S. A. (2018). Get the F#*k Out My Way! "Exploring the Carhartic Effect of Swear Words in Coping with Driving Anger. Elsevier, 12.

Prof. Dr. Sumarsono, M. E. (2012). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: SABDA.

Purandina, I. P. (2014). POLITENESS IN EFL CLASSROOM INTERACTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS TOWARD EFL TEACHING-LEARNING IN SMP NEGERI 2 TABANAN IN ACADEMIC. e-journal.

Putra, R. R. (2012). Bentuk dan Fungsi Kata Umpatan pada Komunikasi Informal di Kalangan Siswa SMA Negeri 3 Surabaya: Kajian Sosiolinguistik. google scholar, 13.

SAFITRI, K. (2014). Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negei 3 Sewon. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Samara, A. (2017). Acquiring Variation in An Artificial Language: Children and Adults Are Sensitive to Socially Conditioned Linguistic Variation. Elsevier, 30.

Soler, E. A. (2005). Does Instruction Work for Learning Pragmatics in the EFL Context. ScienceDirect, 10.

Spolsky, B. (2003). Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Taguchi, N. (2018 ). Description and Explanation of Pragmatic Development: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Research. Elsevier, 10.

Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and Explanation of Pragmatic Development: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Researc. Elsevier, 10.

Wahyudi, M. A. (2018). The Effectiveness of Speed Reading Technique in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension at Fourth Semesters of English Department. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 1(1).

Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). Men and Women Differences in Using Language: A Case Study of Students at STAIN Kudus. English Education, Literature, and Culture (EduLite), 12.

Walko, Z. (2007). EFL Research Articles Through The Lens of Pragmatic Politeness. Google Schoolar, 16.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Australia: Blackwell.

Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

17-06-2021

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

ETJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, ETJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and ETJ to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. 

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Reproduce the work
  • Prepare derivative works based upon the work
  • Distribute copies of the work
  • Perform the work publicly
  • Display the work publicly
  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to self-archive the article (please read our repository policy),
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.