SPEAK UP YOUR STUDENTS WITH MIRROR, HANDS AND EYES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v3i1.730Keywords:
Mirror, Hands and Eyes, Technique, SpeakingAbstract
Mirror, Hands and Eyes is a technique to teach speaking which use mimic in it. This research has purposes to describe how the implementation of Mirror, Hands and Eyes, and to know the advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of Mirror, Hands and Eyes in teaching speaking. This is descriptive qualitative research. The researcher takes three sources of the data, social situation, informant, and document. The sample is using purposive sampling. Observation, interview and documentation are the technique used by the researcher to collect the data. Theoretical and methodological triangulation used by the researcher to measure the valid data. The techniques of analyzing data are compiling, disassembling, reassembling, interpreting, and concluding.The advantages of this technique are increase the students’ speaking skill, increase the students’ enthusiast, easily follow the correct pronunciation, lock the students’ focus. The disadvantages are the technique disallow the students build new words, and the lack of vocabulary makes the students face the difficulties to make sentences. It can be concluded by the theory of Panesso and Brown with little modification to make students speak up that show the implementation of Mirror, Hands and Eyes works in chronological ways with pre-activity, whilst activity, and post activity inside.
Downloads
References
Biffle, Christopher. (2013). Whole Brain Teaching for Challenging Kids. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2000). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. New York: Longman.
Fraenkel, Jack R. et al. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kelly, Spencer D. et al. (2008). Gesture Gives a Hand to Language and Learning: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Psychology and Education. Colgate University: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Mackey A. and Gass. M Susan. (2005). Second Language Research Methodology and Design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
Maria Szott and Megan Molitoris. (2010). How Can Whole Brain Teaching Impact Our Classroom Environment?.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging Schools Fostering High School Students' Motivation to Learn. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Panesso, Carmen Helena Rodas et al. (2012). Implementation of The Whole Brain Teaching Method in A Third Grade from A Public School in Pereira, Risaralda. Pereira: Universidad Tecnològica De Pereira.
Qian, Xiaoqing. (2012). A Study on the Teaching Methods of Improving Students' Oral English. Finland: Academy Publisher.
Septiana, Mega. (2014). Somatic Auditory Visual Intellectual (SAVI) in Teaching Speaking of Descriptive Text to the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 1 Barat Magetan in Schooling Year 2013/2014. Unpublished Thesis. Madiun: Department of English Teaching. IKIP PGRI Madiun.
Westwood, Peter S. (2004). Learning and Learning Difficulties A Handbook for Teachers. Victoria: ACER Press.
Yin K. Robert. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. United States of America: The Guild Ford Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Â
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
ETJ's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, ETJ permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and ETJ to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.Â
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article (please read our repository policy),
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
