Email this article 
Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Berdasarkan Gender: Suatu Kasus di Sekolah Berbasis Pesantren
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine differences in students' mathematical communication skills based on gender with learning using metacognitive strategies. This research method is a quasi-experimental design using a pretest-posttest control group design. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling which consisted of 19 male students as the first experimental group and 17 female students as the second experimental group. The instrument used was in the form of a five-point essay test to measure the aspects of students' mathematical communication skills after being given a treatment, namely learning using metacognitive strategies. The pre-test mean score shows that female students are higher than male students, on the contrary, the average score of the post-test results, it is known that male students are higher. The data were analyzed using the t-test, it was concluded that there was a significant difference between the mathematical abilities of male and female students. This difference is consistent with several previous research results, although not a few studies also state that there is no significant difference between students' academic abilities based on gender.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alan D. Boivd. A.D and Patrick H. Brady, BP.H. 2003.Gender Differences in Mathematics Anxiety A m o n g Preservice Teachers and Perceptions of Their Elementary and Secondary School Experience with Mathematics. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research Vol. XLIX, No. 1, Spring 2003,24-3
Alhaddad, I., et.al. (2015). Enhancing Students’Communication Skills through Treffinger Teaching Model. IndoMS Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 31-39
Arhin, A.K and Offoe, A.K. 2015. Gender Differences and Mathematics Achievement of Senior High School Students: A Case of Ghana National College. Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.6, No.33, 2015
Asante, K.O. 2014. Sex Differences in Mathematics Performance among Senior High Students in Ghana. DOI: 10.4314/gab.v8i2.61947. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231598245
Bishop, A.J. 2008. Mathematics Education Library of Congress Control Number: 2007936207. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
Boivd, A.D., and Brady, P.H. 2003.Gender Differences in Mathematics Anxiety Among Preservice Teachers and Perceptions of Their Elementary and Secondary School Experience with Mathematics. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research Vol. XLIX, No. 1, Spring 2003,24-3
Brendefur. J & Frykholm. J. (2000). Promoting Mathematical Communication In The
Classroom: two preservice teachers’ conceptions and practices. Journal of
Mathematics Teacher Education 3: 125–153, 2000
Ciascai, Liliana, dan Lavinia.2011. Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in Romania. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2011). Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.255
Coocke, B.D. & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical Communication in the Classroom: A
Teacher Makes a Difference. Early Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 32, No. 6
Dahiana, W.O., Tatang, H., and Nirawati, R. 2019. Student mathematical communication capability improvement using the Metacognitive strategy.
International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Volume 4, 2019 | P-ISSN 2655-2361, E-ISSN 2655-3252
http://science.conference.upi.edu/proceeding/index.php/ICMScE
Demire, M., Derman,I., and Karagedik, E. 2015. A study on the relationship between reflective thinking skills towards problem solving and attitudes towards mathematics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.326.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Fallan, L., & Opstad, L. 2016. Student Self-Efficacy and Gender-Personality Interactions. www.sciedupress.com/ijhe International Journal of Higher Education Vol. 5, No. 3; 2016
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers‟ knowledge and its impact. In D. A.
Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning
(pp. 147- 164). New York: Macmillan.
Fox, L. H., Brody, L., & Tobin, D. (Eds.) (1980). Women and the mathematical mystique. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gallagher, A.M and Frontmatter, J.C.K. 2005. Gender Differences in Mathematics An Integrative Psychological Approach. Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82605-1
Goodwin, K. S., Lee Ostrom, L., and Scott. K. W. 2009. Gender Differences in Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Back Substitution in Multiple-Choice Assessment. Journal of Adult Education Volume 38, Number 1.
Guiller, J., and Durndell , A. 2007.Students’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 2240–2255. www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh
Hedges LV and Nowell A.1995. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 1995;269:41–45. [PubMed: 7604277]
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. H., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Jbeili, I . (2012). The Effect of Cooperative Learning with Metacognitive
Scaffolding on Mathematics Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Fluency
Nternational journal for research in education (ijre) no. 32.
Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women‘s math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
Lindberg, S.M., Hyde J.S., Petersen, J.L., and Linn, M.C . 2010. New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-AnalysisArticle in Psychological Bulletin November 2010. DOI: 10.1037/a0021276 • Source: PubMed. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47642285
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives.In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 597-622). New York: Macmillan
Ma, Xin. 1999. Gender Differences in Growth in Mathematical Skills During Secondary Grades: A Growth Model Analysis. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research Vol. XLV, No. 4, Winter 1999,448-466
Meggiolaro, S . 2018. Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: evidence from Italy. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9425-7
NCTM. 1991. Professional Standards' for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM
NCTM.2000. Princip And Standards For School Mathematic. Reston : Virginia.
Nerru P. M., Mariani, S., and Cahyono, E.2013. Pembelajaran Metode Reciprocal Teaching Berbantuan Cabri Untuk Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Kelas X. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 2 (1) (2013). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Ormrod, J.E. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang
Jilid 1. Jakarta : Erlangga
Pasaribu,I., P. Siagian, Amry, Z..2018. The Differentiation of Improved Communication Mathematic and Disposition Skill Through Problem. Based Learning and Realistic Mathematic Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 200 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018).Published by Atlantis Press. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Peterson, P., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, students engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22(63), 309335.
Ramdani, Y. (2012). Pengembangan Instrumen dan Bahan Ajar untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi, Penalaran, dan Koneksi Matematis dalam Konsep Integral. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(1), 44-52.
Randhawa, B. S. (1994). Self-efficacy in mathematics, attitudes, and achievement of boys and girls from restricted samples in two countries. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 79:1011-1018.
Santos, ., & Semana, S. 2014. Developing mathematics written communication through expository writing supported by assessment strategies. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014. DOI 10.1007/s10649-014-9557-z
Sefiany, M., Masrukan, & Zaenuri. (2016). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VII pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Knisley Berdasarkan Self Efficacy. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 227-233.
Setati, M. 2002. Researching Mathematics Education and Language in Multilingual South Africa. The Mathematics Educator Vol. 12 No. 2, Fall 2002
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sensemaking in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
Setiawan, E. 2013. MODERNISASI POLA SISTEM PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN (Studi Kasus Pondok Pesantren Modern Daarul Fikri Mulyoagung Dau Malang). doi: 10.18860/ua.v14i2.2656. Tersedia: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285093982_MODERNISASI_POLA_SISTEM_PENDIDIKAN_PESANTREN_Studi_Kasus_Pondok_Pesantren_Modern_Daarul_Fikri_Mulyoagung_Dau_Malang
Steinbring, H. (2009). The construction of new mathematical knowledge in classroom interaction: An epistemological perspective. Berlin and new York: Springer.
Su, H.F.,Ricci, F.A.,& Mnatsakanian, M. (2016).Mathematical teaching strategies: Pathways to critical thinking and metacognition.Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 190-200.
Tandililing, E. .2011. The Enhancement of Mathematical Communication and Self Regulated Learning of Senior High School Students Through PQ4R Strategy Accompanied by Refutation Text Reading. Proceeding ISBN : 978 – 979 – 16353 – 7 – Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, July 21-23 2011
Triyadi, R. (2013). Kemampuan matematis ditinjau dari perbedaan gender (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).
Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89-109. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (Tenth Edition). New York, NY: Pearson Educational, Inc.
Zakiri, I. K., Pujiastuti, E., & Asih, T. S. N. (2018). The mathematical communication ability based on gender difference on students of XI grade by using problem based learning model assisted by probing prompting technique. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 78-84. doi: 10.15294/ujme.v7i2.20645
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 777 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i2.7723
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View JIPM Stats
JIPM indexed by:
Copyright of JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ISSN 2502-1745 (Online) and ISSN 2301-7929 (Print)