MINOR TRUTH OF GIRL MATH ON MENTAL ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Niswatin Zahrah Universitas Surabaya
  • Bonnie Soeherman Universitas Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v13i3.20991

Keywords:

Mental accounting, Impulsive buying behavior, Girl math, Decision making, Self control, Perilaku belanja impulsif, Pengambilan keputusan, Pengendalian diri

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The "Girl Math" trend has become widespread and viral, seemingly supporting the idea that women tend to be impulsive when shopping. This research discusses the phenomenon in the context of mental accounting. This research aims to construct a conceptual model of girl math from the mental accounting perspective. This research uses the interpretivism paradigm to explore the meaning of the reality being studied through the triangulation of interview methods, observation, and information analysis through social media, the internet, and other relevant articles. This study found that almost all-girl math trends encourage impulsive buying behavior. They have a logic and mental accounting that differ from the general rational standards. Girl math has its own rationalization. The mindset of girls math occurs due to internal and external factors. Internal factors include emotions, the availability of economic resources, and self-control. External factors include community roles, product attraction, and media framing. Girl math could become another truth, but it is merely the truth of a minority.

ABSTRAK

Tren “Girl Math” menjadi marak dan viral dimana tren ini seolah mendukung anggapan bahwa perempuan cenderung impulsif dalam berbelanja. Penelitian ini membahas fenomena tersebut dalam konteks mental accounting. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkonstruk sebuah model konseptual girl math dalam perspektif mental accounting. Penelitian ini menggunakan paradigma interpretivisme untuk menggali makna dari realita yang diteliti melalui triangulasi metode wawancara, observasi, dan analisis informasi melalui media sosial, internet serta artikel lain yang relevan. Penelitian ini menemukan hampir seluruh tren girl math mendorong terjadinya impulsive buying behavior. Mereka memiliki logika dan mental accounting yang berbeda dengan standar rasional umum. Girl math memiliki rasionalisasinya sendiri. Mindset girl math terjadi akibat faktor internal dan eksternal. Faktor internal meliputi emosi, kesediaan sumber daya ekonomi, dan pengendalian diri. Sedangkan faktor eksternal terdiri atas peran komunitas, atraksi produk, dan framing media. Girl math bisa saja menjadi kebenaran yang lain, namun kebenaran sebatas kebenaran minoritas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bonnie Soeherman, Universitas Surabaya

Corresponding Author

References

Abdelsalam, S., Salim, N., Alias, R. A., & Husain, O. (2020). Understanding Online Impulse Buying Behavior in Social Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 8, 89041–89058. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993671.

Akram, U., Hui, P., & Khan, M. K. (2017). The plight of humanity: Online impulse shopping in China. Human Systems Management, 36(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-171768.

Akram, U., Hui, P., Khan, M. K., Yan, C., & Akram, Z. (2018). Factors affecting online impulse buying: Evidence from Chinese social commerce environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020352.

Ali, M., & Amir, H. (2024). Understanding consumer herding behavior in online purchases and its implications for online retailers and marketers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 64(March-April 2024).

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101356.

Amalia, R., & Firmadhani, C. (2022). Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan (1st ed.). R7 Mediaprinting.

Aw, E. C. X., & Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3474.

Baumeister, R. F. (2022). Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior Get access Arrow. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1086/338209.

Bellini, S., Cardinali, M. G., & Grandi, B. (2017). A structural equation model of impulse buying behaviour in grocery retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36(May 2017), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.001.

Beurer-Zuellig, B., & Seiler, R. (2017). Deal or no deal? Assessing the daily deal shopper. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017-January, 4108–4117. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.497.

Chang, Y. T., Yu, H., & Peng, L. H. (2015). Persuasive messages, popularity cohesion, and message diffusion in social media marketing. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.027.

Chen, C. C., & You, J. Y. (2018). What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? The perspective of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1249–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.02.007 Get rights and content.

Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Pan, Z. (2019). How do product recommendations affect impulse buying? An empirical study on WeChat social commerce. Information and Management, 56(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.002.

Christenson, G. A., Faber, R. J., de Zwaan, M., Raymond, N. C., Specker, S. M., Ekern, M. D., Mackenzie, T. B., Crosby, R. D., Crow, S. J., & Eckert, E. D. (1994). Compulsive buying: descriptive characteristics and psychiatric comorbidity. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55(1), 5–11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8294395.

Chung, N., Song, H. G., & Lee, H. (2017). Consumers’ impulsive buying behavior of restaurant products in social commerce. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 709–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0608.

Coley, A., & Burgess, B. (2003). Gender differences in cognitive and affective impulse buying. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(3), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020310484834.

Das, S., Barve, A., Sahu, N. C., & Muduli, K. (2023). Enabling artificial intelligence for sustainable food grain supply chains: an agri 5.0 and circular economy perspective. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 2104–2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00390-z.

Efendi, R., Indartono, S., & Sukidjo, S. (2019). The Mediation of Economic Literacy on the Effect of Self Control on Impulsive Buying Behaviour Moderated By Peers. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.7738.

Ehsaei, P. (2023). Why The TikTok Trend ‘Girl Math’ Regresses Women To The 1970s. https://www.forbes.com/sites/pattieehsaei/2023/08/29/why-the-tiktok-trend-girl-math-regresses-women-to-the-1970s/?sh=5f2089047c62.

Feng, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Wu, M., & Yang, Q. (2024). Impulse buying behavior during livestreaming: Moderating effects of scarcity persuasion and price perception. Heliyon, 10(7), e28347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28347.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-16

Issue

Section

Articles