DETERMINATION OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LIQUIDITY OF DEBT IN THE RAMBU SOLO’

Chalarce Totanan; Laendatu Paembonan; Gabriella Pingkan Kekka; Elimawati Rombe

doi:10.25273/jap.v12i2.12399

DETERMINATION OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LIQUIDITY OF DEBT IN THE RAMBU SOLO’

Chalarce Totanan, Laendatu Paembonan, Gabriella Pingkan Kekka, Elimawati Rombe

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study aims to examine and analyze the determination of accountability on the liquidity of rambu solo’ debt. The research population is members of the Toraja community who live in Palu City. Samples were taken purposively, and 150 people of Toraja lived in Palu City. Who are get in Perhimpunan Masyarakat Toraja Indonesia (PMTI). Data were obtained through questionnaires that were distributed directly to respondents. The results showed that determining loving-kindness and socio-cultural accountability affected debt liquidity in the rambu solo’ culture. In contrast, physical accountability did not affect debt liquidity in the rambu solo’ culture.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis penentuan akuntabilitas likuiditas utang rambu solo’. Populasi penelitian adalah anggota masyarakat Toraja yang berdomisili di Kota Palu. Sampel diambil secara purposif sebanyak 150 orang masyarakat Toraja yang tinggal di kota Palu. Yang tergabung dalam Perhimpunan Masyarakat Toraja Indonesia (PMTI). Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner yang dibagikan langsung kepada responden. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penentuan akuntabilitas cinta kasih dan akuntabilitas sosial budaya berpengaruh terhadap likuiditas utang pada budaya rambu solo’, sedangkan akuntabilitas fisik tidak berpengaruh terhadap likuiditas utang pada budaya rambu solo’.

Keywords

Love Accountability; Socio-Cultural Accountability; Akuntabilitas Cinta; Akuntabilitas Sosial Budaya; Akuntabilitas Fisik; Likuiditas; Hutang Rambu Solo’Physical Accountability; Liquidity; Rambu Solo’ Debt;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aithal, P. S. (2021). Business Excellence through the Theory of Accountability. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, May(May), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0103

Din, M., Munawarah, M., Ghozali, I., Achmad, T., & Karim, F. (2022). Governance of Financial Management and Regulation-Based Fiscal Accountability. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i2art10

Hamdani. (2016). Good Corporate Governance: Tinjauan Etika dalam Praktik Bisnis. Mitra Wacana Media.

Heineck, G. (2017). Love thy neighbor – religion and prosociality. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(7), 869–883. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2015-0258

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2018). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (K. D. S. A. K. I. A. Indonesia (ed.); 2018th ed.). Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Indriasari, R., Totanan, C., Made, N., Parwati, S., Mayapada, A. G., & Pakawaru, M. I. (2022). Basic environmental accountability in the yadnya ceremony in Malakosa Village, Indonesia. AMCA JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v2i1.89

Jensen, M. C., & Mekling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.

Jossa, B. (2021). Liquidity Preference Theory or Loanable Funds Theory. Archives of Business Research, 9(8), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.98.10544

Keay, A. (2017). Stewardship theory: Is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1292–1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0118

LAN dan BPKP. (1999). Akuntabilitas dan Good Corporate Governance. LAN dan BPKP.

Murakami, H. (2022). Keynesian and classical theories: static and dynamic perspectives. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 19(1), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-021-00205-5

Nurmandi, A., Agustiyara, A., & Purnomo, E. P. (2020). What Factors Affect Financial Transparency Reports? A Study of Regional Government Financial Reports in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, VIII(Issue 4), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/604

Panggabean, J. S. E. A., & Hariwibowo, I. N. (2021). Keterbukaan Budaya Lokal Dalam Akuntabilitas Keuangan Gereja Kristen. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(3), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2021.12.3.34

Paranoan, S. (2015). Akuntabilitas Dalam Upacara Adat Pemakaman. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(2), 175–340.

Peng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022). Social Networks, Trading, and Liquidity. In SSRN Electronic Journal (p. 31). SSRN Product and Services; Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4099114

Pidhegso, Achmad Yugo Huda, F. N., Fadli, S. D., & Darma, T. S. (2020). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara: Studi Kasus Empat Tahun Anggaran (2015-2018) Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat (F. N. Pidhegso, Achmad Yugo Huda & S. D. Fadli (eds.); 1st ed.). Pusat Kajian Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara.

Pilon, M., & Brouard, F. (2022). Accountability Theory in Nonprofit Research: Using Governance Theories to Categorize Dichotomies. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, April 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00482-7

Rahakbuw, P. J., & Firdausy, S. (2018). AKUNTABILITAS: MENUJU INDONESIA BERKINERJA. Deputian Reformasi Birokrasi: Kementerian PAN Dan Birokrasi Reformasi. http://rbkunwas.menpan.go.id/artikel/artikel-rbkunwas/426-akuntabilitas-menuju-indonesia-berkinerja

Randa, F. (2016). REKONSTRUKSI KONSEP AKUNTABILITAS ORGANISASI GEREJA DALAM KERANGKA NILAI-NILAI BUDAYA LOKAL. In F. Randa (Ed.), Akuntabilitas Organisasi Nonpemerintah (pp. 1–18). Universitas Duta Wacana. https://www.academia.edu/10355138/REKONSTRUKSI_KONSEP_AKUNTABILITAS_ORGANISASI_GEREJA_DALAM_KERANGKA_NILAI_NILAI_BUDAYA_LOKAL_Sebuah_Kajian_Etnografi_Kritis_Inkulturatif_

Shalchian, H., M’Zali, B., & Tebini, H. (2018). A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Liquidity Risk Factor. Journal of Financial Risk Management, 07(03), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2018.73016

Subramanyan, K. R. (2017). Financial Statement Analysis (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Asia.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suwanda, D. (2015). Factors Affecting Quality of Local Government Financial Statements to Get Unqualified Opinion (WTP) of Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK). Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(4), 139–157.

Totanan, C. (2012). Debt And Credit Principle in Culture Toraja Ethnic Rambu Solo': A New Perspective Non-Contractual. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 26–31.

Totanan, C. (2021). Semiotika Utang Dalam Budaya Rambu Solo’ Masyarakat Toraja: Akuntansinya Di Mana (D. Kusumaningsih & Supriatnoko (eds.); 1st ed.). Bildung.

Yamin, N. Y. (2022). Pendekatan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sektor Publik. In S. S. Sharon (Ed.), Bunga Rampai Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sektor Publik (1st ed., pp. 117–134). Media Sains Indonesia. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1l_bsTKDUWKa-KKfuYgtXZzDAEE5Q73Jx?usp=sharing