Misconception Analysis of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Numeration of High School Students from Field Dependent Cognitive Style

Retno Wahyu Arian Sah; Alfi Rachma Nisfi Laila; Astri Setyawati; Rani Darmayanti; Dewi Nurmalitasari

doi:10.25273/jems.v11i1.14112

Misconception Analysis of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Numeration of High School Students from Field Dependent Cognitive Style

Retno Wahyu Arian Sah, Alfi Rachma Nisfi Laila, Astri Setyawati, Rani Darmayanti, Dewi Nurmalitasari

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the extent of misunderstandings experienced by high school students while tackling Minimum Numerical Ability (AKM) questions modeled on the basis of domain-dependent cognitive styles. The number of students used as subjects in the study was her XI-IPS students in class three (3). The study was conducted at Tawangsari, Tulungagung District, Kedungwal, MA Darul Hikma, Tulungagung District, Jl KH Abu Mansur I. The study was conducted in even-numbered terms of the academic year 2021-2022. A targeted sampling method with the GEFT test (Group Embedded Figure Test) is used to determine research topics and classify students as having subject-dependent cognitive styles or not (subject-dependent). The results showed that students were categorized based on their AKM numbering test response results of low, medium, and high misconceptions. The number of questions is 3 questions. The first item is used to make sure that the indicator cannot repeat the concept. The second item is used to determine that the indicator fails to formulate the concept correctly in various mathematical representations. The index cannot determine the formula that answers the question. Indicators cannot apply formulas or algorithms to solve problems. The third item is used to see indicators of inability to use formulas or problem-solving algorithms. The results obtained show that subject-specific style students with low misunderstandings score higher from responses to AKM numbering questions than students with moderate and high misunderstandings.

Keywords

Minimum Competency Assessment; Field Dependent Cognitive Style; Misconceptions; Number

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdara, A. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Calon Guru Matematika Dalam Pengajuan Masalah Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i1.7120

Alphonce, S., & Mwantimwa, K. (2019). Students’ use of digital learning resources: diversity, motivations and challenges. Information and Learning Science, 120(11–12). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0048

Chen, Y. C. (2019). Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance, Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math Course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854036

Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Muhammad, Y. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Adaptive Reasoning Ability in Solving HOTS Problems Arithmetic Sequences and Series in Terms of Learning Style. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1).

Darmayanti, R., Usmyatun, U., Setio, A., Sekaryanti, R., & Safitri, N. D. (2023). Application of Vygotsky Theory in High School Mathematics Learning Material Limit Functions. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 11(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v11i1.14099

Fernández, E. A., Samacá, L. F., & Martín, C. R. (2021). Diagnose, Analysis, and Proposal of Project Based Learning (PBL): A Case for Analog Communications Course. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, 2021-July. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2021.1.1.461

Fitria, R. N., Nabila, R. F., Wardani, M. P., Zalsabella, M. P., Pertiwi, W., & Darmadi, D. (2021). Respon Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Unipma Dalam Memecakan Masalah Geometri Ditinjau Dari Aspek Filsafat Ilmu Selama Perkuliahan Daring. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 4(1), 76-84.

Gozali, I., Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., & Jemadi, F. (2021). HOTS questioning ability and HOTS perception of language teachers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34583

Harahap, Z. I. S., Muchlis, E. E., & Maulidiya, D. (2019). Faktor – Faktor Penyebab Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tentang Luas Permukaan Kubus Dan Balok Kelas Viii Smpn 18 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 3(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.3.3.342-352

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935

Kemdikbud. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Desain Pengembangan AKM, 1–125.

Kusumaningtyas, S. I., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2017). Pemecahan Masalah Generalisasi Pola Siswa Kelas VII SMP Ditinjuau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i1.6994

Lusiana, R., Suprapto, E., & Sukristini, I. (2021). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ). Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(02), 55-63.

Miles, M. B. , & H. A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif (UI Press). Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru.

Mirlanda, E. P., & Pujiastuti, H. (2018). KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS: ANALISIS BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v3i2.1252

Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Calculus by Undergraduate Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2).

NCTM. (2000). Six Principles for School Mathematics.

Nidia Zuraya. (2012). KH Hisyam, Pelopor Pendidikan Modern Muhammadiyah (3-habis). Republika.Co.Id.

Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi Meningkatkan Kompetensi 4C (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, &Collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810

Rahmah, K., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Sugianto, R., & Ningsih, E. F. (2022). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Based on APOS Theory Viewed from the Type of Kolb Learning Style. INdoMATH: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 5(2), 109–122. https://indomath.org/index.php/

Rahmawati, P., Afreza, I. N., Anshori, M. L., Putri, Q. A., & Lusiana, R. (2021). PELATIHAN BIOENTERPRENEURSHIP BAGI REMAJA PUTUS SEKOLAH DI LOPOSOS DESA SAMBIREJO UNTUK MENINGKATKAN EKONOMI DI SEKTOR INDUSTRI KREATIF. PATIKALA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 16-23.

Ruskhan Fauza, M., Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., Prasetyo, B., Mariyanto, A., & Lony, A. (2022). Problem Solving Ability: Strategy Analysis of Working Backwards Based on Polya Steps for Middle School Students YALC Pasuruan. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 10(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13338

Schnepper, L. C., & McCoy, L. P. (2013). Analysis of Misconceptions in High School Mathematics. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 15(1), 625–625. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1066

Sekaryanti, R., Cholily, Y. M., Darmayanti, R., Rahma, K., Prasetyo, B., & Maryanto, A. (2022). Analysis of Written Mathematics Communication Skills in Solving Solo Taxonomy Assisted Problems. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 10(2), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.13707

Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838

Sudihartinih, E. (2020). Students’ Mistakes and Misconceptions on the Subject of Conics. International Journal of Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i2.19130

Sugianto, R., Muchamad Cholily, Y., Darmayanti, R., Rahmah, K., & Hasanah, N. (2022). Development of Rainbow Mathematics Card in TGT Learning Model for Increasing Mathematics Communication Ability. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 221–234. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano

Suprapto, E., Setyansah, R. K., & Devina, D. (2021). GeoGebra Application Based Tutorial Materials to Improve Spatial Mathematics Abilities in Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(2), 175-181.

Syaifuddin, M., Darmayanti, R., Rizki, N., Sugianto, R., & Niswatun Hasanah. (2022). High school students’ mathematical representation ability: Evaluation of disposition based on mastery learning assessment model (MLAM). Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–15. https://www.journal.foundae.com/index.php/jasme/index://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001

Wooldrdge, B., & Bartolf, M. H. (2006). Field dependence-field independence learning style.pdf. In Learning Styles and Learning (pp. 237–257).

Yuliarisma, S. A., Darmadi, D., Ningrum, P. P., Safitri, A., Prasetyo, Y. E., & Nisa, K. (2021). Peran Orang Tua Dalam Menyeimbangkan Psikologi Anak Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Masa Covid 19. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 4(1), 70-75.