Legal Response to the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Through Additional Examination Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2021
Keywords:
Legal Response to Object, Business Competition Supervisory Commission, Additional Examination and Business Competition Supervisory CommissionAbstract
This study aims to find out about legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions through additional examinations based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2021. The problem discussed in this study is the violation of the principle of justice in legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions that occur in the District Court. The data analysis method used in this study is the normative legal analysis method and comparative law. The normative legal method is used to analyze data that refers to legal norms contained in laws and regulations. The results of the data analysis in this study indicate a violation of the principle of justice in legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions. In practice, the burden of proof is carried out in an unbalanced manner, where the applicant cannot provide new evidence while the KPPU can strengthen and clarify the evidence through additional examinations ordered by the judge if the judge feels it is unclear. As a result, the objection applicant cannot strengthen his defense because he cannot add new evidence that can relieve the applicant
Downloads
References
Regulations
Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 1 of 2010 concerning Procedures for Handling Cases
Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2021 concerning Procedures for Submitting and Examining Objections to Decisions of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in the Commercial Court
Books and Literatures
Fahmi Lubis, Andi, et al., 2009, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks & Konteks, Creative Media, Jakarta.
Sarjana, I Made, 2014, Prinsip Pembuktian Dalam Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha, Zifataman, Sidoarjo.
Kamal Rokan, Mustafa, 2012, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
S. Matompo, Osgar, 2015, Hakikat Hukum Sistem Persaingan Usaha yang Sehat, Kompetitif dan Berkeadilan, Genta, Yogyakarta.
Usman, Rachmadi, 2013, Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Adi Nugroho, Susanti, 2012, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta.
Margono, Suyud, 2009, Hukum Anti Monopoli, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Journals
Ramawati, Diah, et al, 2013 Upaya Hukum terhadap Putusan KPPU oleh Panitia Tender dalam Hal Diputus Bersalah Melanggar Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jurnal Mahasiswa S2 Volume 9 Nomor 1, Tanjungpura.
Alhumami, Khunaifi, 2012, Peran Lembaga Pemeriksaan Tambahan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara-Perkara Mengambang, Jurnal Bina Adhyaksa Volume 3, Jakarta.
Online media
Hukum Online, MA Revisi Perma Terkait Tata Cara Pengajuan Keberatan Putusan KPPU, terdapat dalam: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt59ba5f65726b1/ma-revisi-perma-terkait-tata-cara-pengajuan-keberatan-putusan-kppu
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Palest Agista Santosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
