Criminal Responsibility for Prison Officers Who Carry Out Extortions (Pungli) in the KPK Detention Center Area

Authors

Keywords:

Extortion, Detention Center, Corruption

Abstract

Extortion by prison officers is unacceptable behavior and a form of corruption. It can have serious consequences, not only for public confidence in the legal system and custody, but also for the welfare and rights of individuals under the supervision of the prison. Extortion can occur in various forms, from withdrawing funds in exchange for special treatment to prisoners, selling prohibited goods in prison, to extorting prisoners or their families to obtain complete facilities that should not be available or accessible to prisoners. Extortion in the KPK prison refers to corrupt practices within the institution, which should be a place where law enforcement against corruption is prioritized. The KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) is an Indonesian government agency established to combat corruption. If there are reports or allegations of extortion in the KPK prison, it is very serious and must be investigated thoroughly. Corruption within law enforcement agencies, especially those tasked with combating corruption such as the KPK, is a betrayal of public trust and undermines the integrity of the justice system. Therefore, if there are indications of extortion in the KPK detention center, firm and transparent law enforcement measures must be taken to uphold justice and ensure that the institution remains at the forefront of fighting corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Regulations

Law No. 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections

Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration

Law No. 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.HH- 01. PK.07.02 of 2009 Number: M.HH-01.PK.07.02 of 2009 Concerning Guidelines for the Provision of Food for Inmates of Correctional Institutions and State Detention Centers.

Books

Dewantara, A. (2017). Filsafat Moral (Pergumulan Etis Keseharian Hidup Manusia).

Dewantara, A. Kasus Loli Candy’s Ditinjau Dari Etika Dan Teori Hati Nurani.

Dewantara, A. (2017). Kerasulan Awam di Bidang Politik (Sosial Kemasyarakatan) dan Relevansinya bagi Multikulturalisme Indonesia

Dewantara, A. W. (2013). Merefleksikan Hubungan antara Etika Aristotelian dan Bisnis dengan Studi Kasus Lumpur Lapindo. Arete, 2(1), 23-40.

Michaella,Sonya. (2018). Kalapas Sukamiskin Jadi Tersangka. Diunduh dari http://news.metrotvnews.com/hukum/Gbmjeoek-kalapas-sukamiskin-jadi-tersangka, 20 November 2018.

Aji, M.Rosseno. (2018). Eks Kepala Lapas Sukamiskin Akui Terima Suap dari Napi Korupsi. Diunduh dari https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1114772/eks-kepala-lapas-sukamiskin-akui-terima-suap-dari-napi-korupsi, 20 November 2018.

News.detik.com/berita/gayus-lagi-ke-singapura-nonton-tenis-di-bali-dan-makan-di-restoran

Nasional.okezone.com/read/sel-tahanan-koruotor-di-lapas-sukamiskin-bak-apartemen-mewah

Dwiyanto, Agus dan Bevaola, Kusumasari, 2003. Reformasi Pelayanan Publik : Apa Yang Harus Dilakukan, dalam PolicyBrief, No. II/PB/2003

Hendra Teguh S.E.,A.K., dan Ronny A. Rusli, S.E Lembaga Administrasi Publik, 2006. Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik, LAN

Lewis, Carol W., andStuart C. Gilman. 2005. The EthicsChallenge in Public Service: A Problem-SolvingGuide. MarketStreet, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Mahmudi, 2005. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, Edisi I, Yogyakarta : Penerbit Buku UPPAMP YKPN

Moelong, Lexy J, 2007.Metode Penulisan Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi, Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung

Pasolong, Harbani. 2007. Teori Administrasi Publik. ALFABETA.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-09

Issue

Section

Articles