The Relevance of Double Effect Doctrine in The Perspective of Criminal Law Causality Doctrine: A Rebuttal to The Concept Of Conditio Sine Qua Non

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/ay.v4i1.18213

Keywords:

Conditio Sine Qua Non Concept, Double Effect Doctrine, Criminal Law, Causality Doctrine

Abstract

This research explores and analyzes how the doctrine of causality, particularly the concept of Conditio Sine Qua Non, and the doctrine of double effect interact and influence the determination of responsibility in criminal law. Using the normative-dogmatic research method, this study systematically analyzes applicable legal rules without empirical data, emphasizing the qualitative application of legal and philosophical principles. The research uses a literature review as the primary data collection tool, examining legal philosophy books, academic journals, and professional publications to draw relevant conclusions. The results indicate that Conditio Sine Qua Non, which focuses on objective causation, needs to be revised for cases involving complex ethical considerations. In contrast, the double effect doctrine introduces an ethical dimension to causality judgments, justifying actions that produce unintended but unavoidable adverse consequences as a side effect of a good goal. The findings suggest that an integrative approach combining both doctrines may lead to a more balanced and comprehensive understanding of criminal liability. This research aims to enrich the academic discourse on causality in criminal law by introducing ethical considerations as part of causal analysis. It offers a new perspective in dealing with criminal cases involving complicated morality and consequences, challenging the existing limitations of causal interpretation. Nevertheless, this study has limitations in terms of its scope of practical application and the need for empirical verification, signaling the need for further research that can evaluate and validate these findings in actual legal practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aires de Sousa, S. (2022). Connections (and Limits) Between Law and Natural Sciences: The Concepts of Causality and Culpability from the Perspective of Criminal Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 35(1), 287–296.

Anderson, J. (1938). The problem of causality. The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, 16(2), 127–142.

Brożek, B., & Kucharzyk, B. (2022). Causality in the Law. In The Concept of Causality in the Lvov-Warsaw School (pp. 249–269). Brill.

Chazawi, A. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2: penafsiran hukum pidana dasar peniadaan, pemberatan & peringanan pidana kejahatan aduan perbarengan & ajaran kausalitas.

Cupido, M. (2021). Causation in international crimes cases:(re) concenptualizing the causal linkage. Criminal Law Forum, 32(1), 1–50.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Jauhani, M. A., & Pratiwi, Y. W. (2023). Autopsi Forensik Sebagai Upaya Mencapai Kepastian Hukum Pada Kasus Kematian Tidak Wajar. WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 71–88.

Kalensang, A. J. (2016). Hubungan Sebab Akibat (Causaliteit) dalam Hukum Pidana dan Penerapannya dalam Praktek. Lex Crimen, 5(7).

Leavens, A. (1988). A Causation Approach to Criminal Omissions. Calif. L. Rev., 76, 547.

Muhdar, M., & Apriyani, R. (2020). Penerapan Teori Conditio sine Qua Non Dalam PeristiwaTumpahan Minyak Di Teluk Balikpapan. Risalah Hukum, 16–33.

Nizar, M., & Sabardi, L. (2019). Ajaran Kausalitas Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 498 K/PID/2016). Jurnal Education and Development, 7(1), 185.

Purwati, A. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum teori & praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.

Rifa’i, I. J. (2023). Ruang Lingkup Metode Penelitian Hukum. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, 6.

Ryu, P. K. (1957). Causation in criminal law. U. Pa. L. Rev., 106, 773.

Sofian, A. (2015). Kausalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Pada Keluarga Civil Law Dan Common Law.

Sofian, A. (2018). Ajaran kausalitas hukum pidana. Prenada Media.

Sopian, M. (2023). Ease of Business Licensing Based on the Job Creation Law (Study of Public Participation in Preparation of AMDAL Document). Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1).

Sukarmanto, D. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA YANG MENGALAMI PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA (PHK) ATAS TUDUHAN MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG BELUM DIPROSES PUTUSAN PIDANA. Journal of Community Service, 5(1), 43–54. https://idm.or.id/JCS/index.php/JCS/article/view/112/100

Susanto, W. I. (2021). PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT DENGAN RENCANA SEBAGAI UNSUR KEALPAAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 372/Pid. B/2020/PN. Jkt. Utr). Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-02-01

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.