The Strength of Proof of MKDKI Decisions in Medical Crime Cases in Indonesia
Abstract
The aim of this research is to determine the evidentiary strength of MKDKI decisions in Medical Crime Cases in Indonesia. MKDKI has the main objective of protecting patient safety, maintaining the quality of service to patients, and also maintaining the honor of the profession of doctors and dentists, which is actualized in the form of a trial in the medical sphere to find out whether a doctor or dentist has made a mistake in applying medical discipline knowledge or not. , institutionally, MKDKI is an autonomous institution from the Indonesian Medical Council whose duties are independent and responsible to the Indonesian Medical Council, then KKI in carrying out its duties is responsible to the president. Complaints submitted to MKDKI act to eliminate the right of every person to report any alleged medical crime to an authorized party or filing a lawsuit for damages in court. The type used in this research is normative legal research. This type of research places more emphasis on answering existing legal problems or issues, and this research uses several approaches, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach. (conceptual approach) and case approach (case approach). The results of this research show that the evidentiary strength of the MKDKI Decision which can be used as documentary evidence in medical criminal cases is as follows: 1) issued by an authorized official or issued by an official institution, 2) the MKDKI decision is produced through a legal and legitimate process , and 3) proof at a trial at MKDKI is the same as in a proceeding using criminal procedural law; and the examination process and trial process are carried out in depth, and carried out by parties who are competent in their fields
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad Fadhil Bustomi, Sutarno, Ninis Nugraheni, Mokhamad Khoirul Huda. (2023). Urgensi Pengadilan Kesehatan Sebagai Solusi Masalah Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 11(11), 2677–2693. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i11.p14
Andryawan. (2016). Kedudukan Majelsi Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) dan Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia (KKI) dalam Penegakan Disiplin Kedokteran di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 298K/TUN/2012). Jurnal Era Hukum, 14(2), 1–31. http://hukumkes.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/aspek-hukum- pelayanan-kesehatan/
Ardinata, Mikho. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Negara terhadap Jaminan Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Jurnal HAM, 11(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.319-332
Bahder Johan Nasution. (2013). Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter,. Rineka Cipta.
Bonifasisus Nadya Aribowo, B. Resti Nurhayati, Sofyan Dahlan. (2017). Persepsi Pasien Tentang Aspek Hukum Perikatan Upaya (Inspanning Verbintenis) dalam Transaksi Terapeutik Antara Dokter dengan Pasien di RSUD Kota Salatiga. Soepra, 3(1), 52–59.
Briant Rizqullah Irawan Al Machrus, Budiarsih. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pasien Telemedicine atar Kesalahan Dokter. Sosialita, 1(1), 1–11.
Budiarsih. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Dokter dalam Missdiagnosis pada Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1(1), 49–58.
Hendrojono Soewono. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Malpraktek Dokter dalam Transaksi Terapeutik. Srikandi.
Herman, Herman. (2020). Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tenaga Medis. Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 7(1), 116.
https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v7i1.12264
I Komang Gede Oka Wijaya. (2017). Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Yuridika, 32(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4829
J. Guwandi. (2004). Hukum Medik (Medical Law). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Kastania Lintang, Hastani, Bahrul Azmi. (2021). Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Displin
Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu
Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5738
Mudakir Iskandar Syah. (2019). Tuntutan Hukum Malpraktek Medis (1st ed.). PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Mulyadi. (2020). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kelalaian Medik yang Berkeadilan di Indonesia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 11(2), 126–138.
Oemar Seno Adji. (1991). Etika Profesional dan Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dokter Profesi Dokter,. Erlangga.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Konsepsi Teoritis penelitian hukum. Kencana Pernada Media Group,.
Shadam Teja Kusuma, Budiarsih. (2023). Procedure for Giving Compensation to Victims of Environmenental Pollution in the Sidoarjo bio Industrial Area. Activa Yuris, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25273/ay
Soerjono Soekanto. (1987). Pengantar Hukum Kesehatan. Remadja Karya. Wila Chandrawila Supriadi. (2001). Hukum Kedokteran. Mandar Maju.
Zola Agustina, Achmad Hariri. (2022). Pertanggung jawaban Pidana Atas Kelalaian Diagnosa Oleh Dokter Hingga Mengakibatkan Kematian Anak Dalam Kandungan. IBLAM Law Review, 2(2), 108–128.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 231 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/ay.v4i1.18092
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Iffatul Lathoif, Budiarsih Budiarsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Office:
Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas PGRI Madiun
email : activayuris@unipma.ac.id