Sharia Banking Dispute Settlement through the Litigation Process

Authors

  • Henri Handal Fifgita Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/ay.v2i2.13339

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Islamic Banking, Litigation

Abstract

This research aims to find out the way to resolve disputes in Islamic Banking through a litigation process. Normative legal research is the method used in this research. This method is to collect the secondary data through literature study by reading the Act, literature book, and the documents that are relative to the topic of this study discussed. The data obtained from the processing of library data was analyzed qualitatively. The treatment of Islamic economic cases, in a simple way, is based on the Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 2 of 2015 concerning the Procedure for a Simple Claims Court. Meanwhile, the handling of Islamic economic cases, in a common way, is based on the applicable Act. In an Islamic economic case by the Party that has made a lawsuit then it can file its lawsuit through the Registrar of the Religious Court of the area where the Plaintiff located or the area where the Defendant is or according to the agreement in the contents of the contract. The trial for examining Islamic economic cases at the Court is open to the public unless otherwise stipulated by law. This is based on the provisions of Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law Number 4 of 2004 that has been changed in Article 13 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. This provision applies to the hearing of the Islamic banking dispute examination, also. In the common trial examination, this Islamic economic dispute occurs when both parties to the dispute or through their proxies are present at the first trial and/or subsequent trial. Before holding the trial, mediation is firstly conducted to find a solution, then the next stage was the examination of the subject matter and the opportunity to answer between the Applicant and Respondent. Based on the provisions of Article 178 HIR / Article 189 RBg, when the case examination is completed, the Panel of Judges, based on their position, conducts deliberation to make a decision to be applied. For the decision of Islamic Banking stating that the Applicant’s claim is accepted, the Respondent can apply to the Appeal before Cassation or Judicial Review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rasyid & Tiska Andita Putri, Kewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 12 No. 2 Agustus 2019. 175-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.256.

Efa Laela Fakhriah, Mekanisme Small Claim Court Dalam Mewujudkan Tercapainya Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum UGM. Vol 25, No 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16096.

Lawrence M. Friedman. (2009), Sistem Hukum Persepektif Ilmu Sosial, Nusamedia, Jakarta. 40.

Mul Irawan. (2018), Implementasi Small Claim Court Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama, Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat. 3.

Materi Seminar Nasional Himpunan Sarjana dan Ilmuwan Syariah, Pada 18 Juni 2011 di Syahida Inn. Narasumber delegasi dari BI, Mahkamah Agung, Peradilan Agama, ASBISINDO, Akademisi (Ahli hukum Universitas Airlangga), dan Praktisi Perbankan Syariah.

Mujahidin, A. (2010). Kewenangan & Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor. 46-47.

Nandang Ihwanudin. (2016), Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah dan Solusi Penyelesaiannya, Jurnal Islamica, Vol. 3 No. 2. STAI Siliwangi. 54.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017) Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta. 119.

Ridwan Mansyur & D.Y. Witanto. (2017) Gugatan Sederhana (Teori, Praktik dan Permasalahannya) Pustaka Dunia, Jakarta. 46-47.

Rika Delfa Yona, Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia, Economic: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darul Ulum Banyuwangi. Vol. 4, No. 1 2014. 59-60. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234800439.pdf

Roihan A Rasyid, (1991), Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Rajawali, Jakarta. 64.

Sarwono. (2011), Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 64.

Soerjono Soekanto. (1986), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UII Press. Jakarta. 56

Suadi, A. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Teori & Praktik. Kencana, Jakarta. 7.

Sudikno Mertokusumo (2006), Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Ketujuh, Liberty, Yogyakarta. 36.

Sugeng Bambang. (2013), Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata Prenada Media Group, Jakarta. 20.

Sutomo & dkk. (2016), Membumikan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, UII Press, Yoyakarta. 2.

Wahyu Widiana. (2001), Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Agama.

Yahya Harahap. (2004), Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. 57-797.

YS, “Kemana Harus Mengadu,†Sharing, 10 Mei 2011.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-09

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.