Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa dalam Mengajukan Masalah Persamaan Diferensial

Wasilatul Murtafiah

Abstract


Problem Posing approach is necessary for teacher training students. Problem Posing can train students to create questions/problems and their solutions. Make problem then solve it is part of student’s creative thinking ability. Differential equations problem is one of the materials that learned in mathematics education courses. Every teacher training student of mathematics has diverse skills. This diversity certainly brings various creative thinking skills as well. The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of student’s creative thinking in mathematical education courses, differential equation problem posing. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Sources of data in this study are the students of mathematics education consist of one student of each with high, medium, and low begining math ability. The data collection was conducted by using observation, testing, and interviews. Technique authenticity of data using a triangulation method. Data analysis technique done in stages, data reduction, data presentation, drawing conclusions, and verification. The result of this study were (1) Students with high initial capability not have fluency and flexibility of thought, but it shows the novelty think that qualifies as a Creative Thinking Ability Level (CTAL) 2 is creative enough, (2) Students with prior knowledge currently have the fluency of thought, but do not have the flexibility and novelty think that qualifies as a Level capabilities creative thinking (CTAL) 1 is less creative, (3) Students with prior knowledge low yet has grace, eloquence, and the novelty of thought that goes into the criteria of creative thinking ability Level (CTAL) 0 is not creative.

Keywords


Creative Thinking Ability; Problem Posing; Differential Equation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Zainal. 2012. Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Depdiknas, 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan(KTSP). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Moleong, Lexy. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sanders, Sarah. 2016. Critical and Creative Thinkers in Mathematics Classrooms. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters. Volume 6, Issue 1. The University of Wollongong Australia.

Siswono, T. Y. E.2005. Menilai Kreativitas Siswa dalam Matematika. Makalah disajikan dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika “Peranan Matematika dan terapannya dalam meningkatkan Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia” di Jurusan FPMIPA Unesa, 28 Pebruari 2005, (Online), (https://tatagyes.files. wordpress.com/2009/11/paper05_nilaikreatif.pdf, Diunduh 16 Juni 2016).

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsaputra, Uhar. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 957 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v5i2.1170

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika



 

View JIPM Stats

 

JIPM indexed by:

       


Copyright of JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ISSN 2502-1745 (Online) and ISSN 2301-7929 (Print)