Bibliometric Analysis of Performance Management: Research Obstacles and Opportunities

Muhammad Hanifa, Bambang Widagdo, Robert Kurniawan

Abstract


This study presents a bibliometric analysis of publications relevant to performance management. Increased research in management has led to the emergence of a new paradigm in applying performance management systems. The researchers explore how to improve the effectiveness of the performance of companies and institutions. This bibliometric analysis research found 945 articles related to performance management using the Scopus database. The R-Studio bibliometric package is used to conduct data analysis to find trends, worldwide distribution of documents, influential journals, frequently used citations, and countries that dominate publishing articles. This study aimed to analyze articles from the Scopus database related to "Performance Management." The findings obtained in this study that the effectiveness of management lies in the organization's ability to determine goals, motivate employees to change individual behavior, and use the Balanced Score Card (BSC). This research can assist organizations in improving the effectiveness of performance management and as an illustration for future research.

Keywords


Performance Management; Balanced Score Card; Bibliometric; R-Studio; Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anglada-Tort, M., & Sanfilippo, K. R. M. (2019). Visualizing Music Psychology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Psychology of Music, Music Perception, and Musicae Scientiae from 1973 to 2017. Music and Science, 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204318811786

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3

Bellisario, A., & Pavlov, A. (2018). Performance management practices in lean manufacturing organizations: a systematic review of research evidence. Production Planning and Control, 29(5), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1432909

Bititci, U., Carrie, A., & Turner, T. (2010). Integrated performance measurement systems: Structure and dynamics. Business Performance Measurement, 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511753695.012

Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(5), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710167230

Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, January. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007

Chiarini, A. (2016). Strategies for improving performance in the Italian local government organizations: Can ISO 9001 really help? International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 33(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2014-0038

Chubb, C. (2011). Performance Management Literature Review. Institute for Employment Studies.

Cynthia, L. (1985). Performance Appraisal Increasing Task Effectiveness : Matching Types , Training Appraisal Process , and. Academy of Management, 10(2), 322–331.

Davis, R. S., & Stazyk, E. C. (2014). Developing and Testing a New Goal Taxonomy: Accounting for the Complexity of Ambiguity and Political Support. 751–775. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu015

de Menezes, L. M., & Escrig, A. B. (2019). Managing performance in quality management: A two-level study of employee perceptions and workplace performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 39(11), 1226–1259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2019-0207

Decramer, A., Smolders, C., & Vanderstraeten, A. (2013). Employee performance management culture and system features in higher education: Relationship with employee performance management satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(2), 352–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.680602

Denisi, A., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Fut. The Academy of Management Annals, 6520. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.873178

Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric idicators: Quality masurements of sientific publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626

Elkanayati, R. M., & Shamah, R. (2019). Could the balanced scorecard enhance pharmaceutical organisations’ quality performance? Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(4), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-07-2018-0060

Jung, C. S., & Rainey, H. G. (2011). Organizational Goal Characteristics and Public Duty Motivation in U. S. Federal Agencies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X10394404

Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190010003425

Kakkar, S., Dash, S., Vohra, N., & Saha, S. (2020). Engaging employees through effective performance management: an empirical examination. Benchmarking, 27(5), 1843–1860. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2019-0440

Kelman, S. (2007). The Transformation of Government in the Decade Ahead. Reflections on 21st Century Government Management, 33–63.

Khan, M. H., & Muktar, S. N. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of green human resource management based on scopus platform. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1831165

Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2021). Tools of Control? Comparing Congressional and Presidential Performance Management Reforms. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13312

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

Liu, Z., Yang, Y., & Wu, J. (2021). Participatory Management, Goal Ambiguity, and Gaming Behaviors in Performance Management: Evidence from Township Government Cadres in Mainland China. Public Performance and Management Review, 44(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1768873

Luo, J., Ji, C., Qiu, C., & Jia, F. (2018). Agri-food supply chain management: Bibliometric and content analyses. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051573

Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007

Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Performance management, managerial authority, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut025

Pattnaik, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2021). Exploring employee performance dimensionality in Indian public sector units. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(3), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0374

Phulwani, P. R., Kumar, D., & Goyal, P. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Recycling Behavior. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1765444

Rajala, T., Laihonen, H., & Kokko, P. (2021). Assessing the fragmentation of hybrids’ performance management systems. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(3), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2020-0061

Singh, B. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of behavioral finance and behavioral accounting. American Business Review, 24(2), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.37625/ABR.24.2.198-230

Sirin, O., Gunduz, M., & Shamiyeh, M. E. (2021). Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for sustainable pavement performance management in Qatar. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(10), 3106–3122. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2020-0136

Sonmez, V., & Pintelon, L. (2020). A survey on performance management of operating rooms and a new KPI proposal. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36(8), 2595–2609. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2739

Stříteská, M., Zapletal, D., & Jelínková, L. (2016). Performance management systems in Czech companies: Findings from a questionnaire survey. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 19(4), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-4-004

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7

Wang, X., & Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about Performance Measurement in Counties: Findings from a Survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003508

Wu, K. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lim, M. K. (2017). Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.027

Yadav, N., Sushil, & Sagar, M. (2013). Performance measurement and management frameworks: Research trends of the last two decades. Business Process Management Journal, 19(6), 947–971. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2013-0003

Zhou, Z., Yao, B., Xu, W., & Wang, L. (2017). Condition monitoring towards energy-efficient manufacturing: a review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(9–12), 3395–3415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0014-x


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 309 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/capital.v7i1.16038

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Capital is indexed by: