INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, POLITICAL CONNECTION, AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING QUALITY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to show empirical evidence of the role of political connections in the relationship between institutional investors and sustainability reporting. With observational data of 2,425 firm years and data analysis using short-term dynamic panel data regression or GMM. This study results that political relations function as a moderating variable. In a sense, a political connection weakens the relationship between institutional investors and genuine sustainability reporting. These results indicate that although institutional investors push for the quality and consistency of sustainability reporting, political connections avoid quality sustainability reporting. The results of this study provide practical implications that allow regulators to evaluate the rules for presenting sustainability reporting information.
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membuktikan secara empiris mengenai peran Political connection dalam hubungan antara investor institusional dan pelaporan keberlanjutan. Dengan menggunakan data observasional 2.425 tahun perusahaan dan analisis data menggunakan GMM, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa political connection berfungsi sebagai pure moderator dalam hubungan antara investor institusional dan pelaporan keberlanjutan. Hubungan politik murni melemahkan hubungan antara investor institusional dan pelaporan keberlanjutan. Hasil ini mengindikasikan bahwa koneksi politik yang lebih besar menyebabkan perusahaan menghindari pelaporan keberlanjutan yang berkualitas meskipun investor institusional mendorong kualitas dan konsistensi pelaporan keberlanjutan. Implikasi praktis penelitain ini memungkinkan regulator untuk mengevaluasi aturan penyajian informasi tentang sustainability reporting.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aman, Z., & Jaafar, S. (2020). Institutional Ownership and Corporate Sustainability Reporting in Malaysia. 7th International Conference on Management and Muamalah, 2020(ICoMM), 297–305.
Bae, S. M., Masud, M. A. K., & Kim, J. D. (2018). A cross-country investigation of corporate governance and corporate sustainability disclosure: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082611
Bertrand, M., Kramarz, F., Schoar, A., & Thesmar, D. (2018). The Cost of Political Connections. Review of Finance, 22(3), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfy008
Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., Wang, H., Guedhami, O., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Cross-listing and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.08.008
Bunea, O. I., Corbos, R. A., & Popescu, R. I. (2019). Influence of some financial indicators on return on equity ratio in the Romanian energy sector - A competitive approach using a DuPont-based analysis. Energy, 189, 116251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116251
Chan, M. C. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2013). Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCESS TO FINANCE. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Cheng, S., Lin, K. Z., & Wong, W. (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9309-1
Cho, C. H., Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). The politics of environmental disclosure regulation in the chemical and petroleum industries : Evidence from the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986. 19, 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.03.014
Clarkson, E. B. M. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance Author ( s ): Max B . E . Clarkson Source : The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 20 , No . 1 ( Jan ., 1995 ), pp . 92-117 Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Dang, V. Q. T., So, E. P. K., & Yan, I. K. M. (2018). The value of political connection: Evidence from the 2011 Egyptian revolution. International Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.10.027
Delgado-Márquez, B. L., Pedauga, L. E., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2017). Industries Regulation and Firm Environmental Disclosure: A Stakeholders’ Perspective on the Importance of Legitimation and International Activities. Organization and Environment, 30(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615622028
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & Mcconnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
Fama, F. E., & Jensen, C. M. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The University of Chicago Press Journals, 26(2), 327–349.
Fan, S., & Wang, C. (2019). Firm age , ultimate ownership , and R & D investments. International Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.11.012
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent directors’ background and CSR disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1515
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/259078
Habib, A., Muhammadi, A. H., & Jiang, H. (2017). Political connections and related party transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.01.004
Hu, H. W., & Sun, P. (2018). What determines the severity of tunneling in China? Asia Pacific Journal Management, 36(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9582-z
Jennings, W. W. (2005). Further Evidence on Institutional Ownership and Corporate Value. Advances in Financial Economics, 11, 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3732(04)11008-6
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Cost And Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., Norwani, N. M., & Farooque, O. Al. (2017). Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 447–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
Lee, J., Kim, S. J., & Kwon, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic means to attract foreign investment: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112121
Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2697
Masud, M. A. K., Bae, S. M., Manzanares, J., & Kim, J. D. (2019). Board directors’ expertise and corporate corruption disclosure: The moderating role of political connections. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164491
Masud, M. A. K., Hossain, M. S., & Kim, J. D. (2018). Is green regulation effective or a failure: Comparative analysis between Bangladesh Bank (BB) green guidelines and global reporting initiative guidelines. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041267
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001
Mulyati, S., & Mulyana, B. (2021). The Effect of Leverage, Firm Size, and Sales Growth on Income Smoothing and Its Implication To the Firm Value (Study on State-Owned Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2016-2019). International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 8(9), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v8.i9.2021.1015
Perrault, E., & Clark, C. (2016). Environmental Shareholder Activism: Considering Status and Reputation in Firm Responsiveness. Organization and Environment, 29(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615571939
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K
Sekali, J., & Bouzahzah, M. (2019). Financial Development and Environmental Quality : Empirical Evidence for Morocco. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7266
Zhao, R. Y. M. (2015). Sustainability and firm valuation: an international investigation. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 23(3), 289–307.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 432 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v11i2.13102
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Elva Nuraina, Noorlailie Soewarno
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ASSETS: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan is supported by
ASSETS: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan is indexed by
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ASSETS: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.