Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Penerapan Sistem Pajak Online Di Kota Madiun

N Nuryanto

doi:10.25273/inventory.v5i1.8974

Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Penerapan Sistem Pajak Online Di Kota Madiun

N Nuryanto

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence the acceptance of information technology systems by teachers in the Madiun City Government by using the Technology Acceptance Model. This research model adopted directly from the research of Tangke (2004) by using perceptions of usefulness and ease of use, which are independent variables and actual use as dependent variables. Data in the form of a questionnaire were collected using the online survey method. The number of questionnaires was 400 questionnaires distributed, 64 of which were successfully collected and can be analyzed. The method of analysis using multiple regression methods. The results of this study indicate that the perceived usefulness and convenience of users have a significant effect on the real use variable.

Keywords: Information technology systems; perceived usefulness; ease of user; and actual

Keywords

information technology systems; perceived usefulness; ease of user; and actual

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adam, D. A, Nelson, R. R, and Todd, P. A. 1992. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication”. Management Information System Quarterly (16:2), pp. 227-250.

Al-Gahtani, S. 2001. “The applicability of TAM outside North America: An empirical test in the United Kingdom”. Information Resources Management Journal. vol.14 (3): 37-46.

Bailey, JE and Pearson,S.W.1983. “Development of a Tool for Measuring andAnalyzing Computer User Satisfaction”. Management Science, 29(5), pp 530-545.

Chau, P.Y.K. (1996). “Measurement Scales for Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use.”

Chin, W. and Todd, P. 1995. ”On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution,” Management Information System Quarterly 9, 2, pp. 237-246.

Davis, F.D., (1989). “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions”110”Fuad dan Fefri: Pendekatan technology acceptance model”.

Davis, F. D., (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of InformationTechnology”, MIS Quarterly , 13/3: 319-339.

Davis, F. D., (1993), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System.Characteristics, User Perceptionsand Behavioral Impacts”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 38/3: 475-487.

Fishbein, M and Azjen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior : An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.

Fishbein dan Ajzen, (1975).“Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: an introduction to theory and research”. California: Addison -Wesely, Boston, MA

Fishbein dan Ajzen, (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: an introduction to theory and research. California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

Gefen, D. 2002. “Customer Loyalty in e-Commerce.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3, pp 27-51.

Goodwin, R.K., & Kemerer (2002) “School choice tradeoff”. New York : Paperback.

Haag, S and Keen P, (1996), “Information Technology, Tomorrow’s Advantage Today ”, McGraw - Hill,.

Igbaria M, Zinatelli. 1997. “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firm: A Structural Equation Modelling.”Management Information System Quarterly, 21(3).

Jogianto. H.M, (2009), Metodologi Penelitian Sistem Informasi, Andi Publisher, Yogyakarta.

Kohli, Rajiv and Kettinger, William J.. 2004. "Informating the Clan: Controlling Physicians’ Costs and Outcomes," MIS Quarterly, (28: 3).

Laudon, Kenneth C. dan Laudon, Jane P. (2008). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Terjemahan Chriswan Sungkono dan Machmudin Eka P. Edisi 10.Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Lee, Y, Kozar, KA & Larsen, KRT 2003, 'The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 12, pp. 752-80.

Martin, E. Wainright, et.al., (1999), “Managing Information Technology What Managers Need to Know”, 3th edition, New Jersey, Pearson Education International.

Mhd. Jantan, T. Ramayah, Chin Weng Wah. 2001. “Personal Computer Acceptance by Small and Medium Sized Companies Evidences from Malaysia”. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, No 1 Volume 3, Program Magister Manajemen Universitas Syiah Kuala (UNSYIAH), Banda Aceh,

Pemerintah Kota Madiun. Peraturan Daerah Kota Perda No. 01 Tahun 2012 tentang Pajak Daerah Kabupaten Klaten Tahun 2012

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah No. 65 Tahun 2001 tentang PajakDaerah.Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2001 Nomor 118.

Sekaran, Uma. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Jilid Satu. Edisi 4. Salemba 4, Jakarta.

Subhan,M. 2007. Pengaruh Variable Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, dan Psychological Attachment Terhadap Pemanfaatan teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta. UGM

Sharda, R., Barn S.H.,dan Mc Donnell J.C. 1998. Decision Support System Effectiviness = A Review dan Empirical Test. Management Science, Vol. 32, No. II, , h.1492-1512.

Tangke, Natalia. 2004. Analisa Penerimaan Penerapan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) RI.Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol.6 No.1 Fakultas Ekonomi –Universitas Kristen Petra.

Wilkinson, Josep W, 2000, “Accounting Information System Essential Concept and Application” 4 Edition, John Willey & Sons Inc, New York-USA.