EVALUASI PENILAIAN PROSES DAN HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN PPKn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25273/citizenship.v8i1.5385Keywords:
Penilaian Proses Pembelajaran, Penilaian Hasil Belajar, dan Model DiscrepancyAbstract
Tujuan peneltian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi (1) Pelaksanaan penilaian proses pembelajaran PPKn di SMA N se-Kabupaten Gunungkidul dan (2) Pelaksanaan penilaian hasil belajar PPKn di SMA N se-Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian evaluasi program dengan model discrepancy. Data yang dikumpulkan dari 11 SMA N se-Kabupaten Gunungkidul dengan jumlah 16 Guru. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode angket, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Uji validitas instrumen angket, observasi, dan dokumentasi menggunakan validasi isi, dan instrumen angket ditambah dengan validasi konstruk. Uji reliabilitas menggunakan formula koefisien alpha (α) Cronbach. Analisis data menggunakan analisis kuantitatif. Hasil Penelitian menujukkan (1) pelaksanaan penilaian proses pembelajaran terbagi menjadi tiga tahap yaitu perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan laporan penilaian. Adapun temuan penelitian bahwa perencanan penilaian proses pembelajaran mendapat kesenjangan sebesar 2.743 % termasuk kategori sangat baik. Pelaksanaan penilaian proses pembelajaran mendapat persentase kesenjangan sebesar 6.3914 % termasuk kategori sangat baik, dan laporan penilaian proses pembelajaran mendapat persentase kesenjangan sebesar 44.875 % termasuk kategori baik. (2) Pelaksanaan penilaian hasil belajar terbagi menjadi tiga tahap yaitu perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan laporan. Adapun temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perencanaan penilaian hasil belajar mendapat persentase kesenjangan sebesar 8.7% termasuk kategori sangat baik. Pelaksanaan penilaian hasil belajar mendapat persentase kesenjangan sebesar 9.9265 % termasuk kategori sangat baik, dan laporan penilaian hasil belajar mendapat persentase kesenjangan sebesar 4.6875 % termasuk kategori sangat baik. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Penilaian proses dan hasil belajar PPKn di SMA N se-Kabupaten Gunungkidul termasuk kategori sangat baik.
Downloads
References
Airasian, W. P. (1991). Classroom assessment. United States: Mc Graw Hill.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society, education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.
Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of education programs. Jakarta: National education planning evaluation and curriculum development.
Gronlund, N. E. (1963). Constructing achievement test. United Sates of America. Prentice-hall, inc.
Gronlund, N. E & Lin, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. London: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Isaac, S & Michael, W. B. (1981). Handbook in research and evalution (2nd ed.). California: Edits Publishers.
Mardapi, Djemari. (2016). Pegukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Payne, D. A. (2003). Applied educational asessment. USA: Wadsworth.
Phopam, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment: what teacher need to know. Los Angeles: Allyn and Bacon.
Reynold, C. R, et. al.(2010). Measurement, and Assessment in educatioan. United State of America: Pearson Education.
Steinmetz, A. (1977). The discrepancy evaluation model. Dalam Merdaus, G. F., Scriven, M. F., & Stufflebeam, D. L. Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation second edition. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D.L & Shinkfield, A.(1985). System evaluation. United State of America: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Stufflebeam, D. L & Coryn, C. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd). San Frasisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Journals:
Bourke, R. & Mentis, M. (2014). An Assessment framework for inclusive education: integrating assessment approaches. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice. 21 (4). 384-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.888332
Brooker, R. (2006). Improving the assessment of practice teaching: a criteria and standards frameword. Asssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 23 (1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230101
Deluca, C., Valiquette, A., Coombs, A., McEwan, D. L., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teachers approaches to classroom assesment: a large scale survey. Assesment in education: principles, policy & practice. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X. 2016. 1244514.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2004). Penilaian pembelajaran sastra berbasis kompetensi. Diksi. 11 (1), 91-116.
Palermo, E. et. al. (2014). Experimental evaluation of accuracy and repeatability of a novel body-to-sensor calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based gait analysis. Measurement. 52, 145-155.
Pan, S. Y. (2017). Reframing citizhenship education in beijing: competing views and strategies. Oxford review of education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305 4985.2017.1295929.
Pieters, J. M & Voogt, J.M. (2016). Teacher learning through teacher teams: what makes learning throught teacher teams successful?. Education reseacrh and evaluation An international journal no theory and practice. 22. (3-4). 115- 120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247726
Richardson, M. (2010). Assessing the assessment of citizenship. Research Papers in Education. 25 (4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520903045566
Wulandari, D. A., Faisal, E. E., & Waluyati, S. A . (2016). Faktor-faktor penghambat implementasi kurikulum 2013 bagi guru mata pelajaran PPKn di SMA N Se Kota Palembang. Jurnal Bhineka Tunggal ika. 3 (1), 72-83. http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jbti/article/view/4571/0
Permendikbud No. 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
With the receipt of the article by the Jurnal Citizenship Editorial Board and the decision to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to Jurnal Citizenship.
Citizenship has the right to multiply and distribute the article and every author is not allowed to publish the same article that was published in this journal. The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded on this form.Â
Fill out the form and submit via email or fax to the following address:
Siska Diana Sari, S.H M.H
Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, FKIP, Universitas PGRI MADIUN
Jl. Setia Budi No. 85 Madiun, East Java, Indonesia
Phone/Fax : +62351462986/+62351459400
email : citizenship@unipma.ac.idÂ
Citizenship Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan by http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/citizenship/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Â
