Juxtaposing Design-Based Thinking Practices of Secondary Student-Teachers During the Internship Program: Input for an Improved Pre-Service Training

Ryan R. Pecson, Laarni C. Canare, Leandro T. Olubia, Monina S. Romero, Gemma C. Adraneda

Abstract


Student-teachers need help with creating and evaluating learning resources once deployed in schools. To provide a responsive approach to deal with their situations, the present study examines the design-based thinking practices among secondary student-teachers during their internship program in various secondary schools in the divisions of Bataan and Balanga City, Province of Bataan, Philippines, as input for the improved pre-service training. The design-based thinking practices of student-teachers are examined in terms of understanding (empathizing and defining), exploring (ideating and prototyping), and materializing (testing and implementing). Likewise, the study ascertains if there are significant differences in the design-based thinking practices of student-teachers. Using the descriptive-survey design of quantitative research, the data are gathered from 172 out of 199 student-teachers under the College of Education (COEd) who are randomly selected. The primary data-gathering tool used in the study is an adopted survey questionnaire. The quantitative data gathered from the study will be analyzed using descriptive statistics (i.e., mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (i.e., F-test/ANOVA). Results indicate that student-teachers excelled in understanding and exploring phases of design-based thinking but lagged in 'Materializing.' To improve, pre-service training should emphasize practical design thinking applications, workshops, mentorship, technology integration, reflection, collaboration, feedback, and continuous development. At the outset, the study proposes improvements in pre-service training to guide student-teachers in their meaningful integration of design-based thinking in their internship program.

Student-teachers need help with creating and evaluating learning resources once deployed in schools. To provide a responsive approach to deal with their situations, the present study examines the design-based thinking practices among secondary student-teachers during their internship program in various secondary schools in the divisions of Bataan and Balanga City, Province of Bataan, Philippines, as input for the improved pre-service training. The design-based thinking practices of student-teachers are examined in terms of understanding (empathizing and defining), exploring (ideating and prototyping), and materializing (testing and implementing). Likewise, the study ascertains if there are significant differences in the design-based thinking practices of student-teachers. Using the descriptive-survey design of quantitative research, the data are gathered from 172 out of 199 student-teachers under the College of Education (COEd) who are randomly selected. The primary data-gathering tool used in the study is an adopted survey questionnaire. The quantitative data gathered from the study will be analyzed using descriptive statistics (i.e., mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (i.e., F-test/ANOVA). Results indicate that student-teachers excelled in understanding and exploring phases of design-based thinking but lagged in 'Materializing.' To improve, pre-service training should emphasize practical design thinking applications, workshops, mentorship, technology integration, reflection, collaboration, feedback, and continuous development. At the outset, the study proposes improvements in pre-service training to guide student-teachers in their meaningful integration of design-based thinking in their internship program.


Keywords


Design-Based Thinking, Student-Teachers, Instructional Design, Secondary Schools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aranda, M. L., Lie, R., & Selcen Guzey, S. (2020). Productive thinking in middle school science students' design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 67-81, March.

Bain, A. (2020). Addressing the challenges of program and course design in higher education with design technologies. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 9(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.51869/92ab

Balakrishnan, B. (2022). Exploring the impact of design thinking tool among design undergraduates: A study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1799-1812, July.

Lyon, J. A. & Magana, A. J. (2021). The use of engineering model-building activities to elicit computational thinking: A design-based research study. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 184-206, January.

Lyon, J. A. & Magana, A. J. (2021). The use of engineering model-building activities to elicit computational thinking: A design-based research study. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 184-206, January.

Nash, J. B. (2019, October). Design thinking in schools: A leader's guide to collaborating for improvement. Harvard Education Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=DESIGN-BASED+THINKING+AMONG+STUDENT+TEACHERS&pg=4&id=ED598620

Ogbu, J. E. (2015). Influences of inadequate instructional materials and facilities in teaching and learning of electrical/electronics technology education courses. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 39–46.

Pecson, R. R. & Romero, M. C. (2023). Design-based thinking among secondary student-teachers: Input for a contextualized teaching plan. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 9(4), 2557–2569.

Shanta, S. & Wells, J. G. (2022). T/E design-based learning: assessing student critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 267–285, March.

Bene, R. & McNeilly, E. (2020). Getting radical: Using design thinking to foster collaboration. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, pp. 4, 50–57.

Chiu, T. K. F., Chai, C. S., Williams, P. J., & Lin, T. J. (2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory-based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153–165, October.

Delen, I. & Sen, S. (2022). Effect of design-based learning on achievement in K-12 education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 330–356, February.

Geeks for Geeks. (2022, November 29). What is the theory of design thinking? https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-theory-of-design-thinking/

Harth, T. & Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in teacher education: preparing engineering students for teaching at vocational schools. International Journal on E-Learning, 18(4), 413-439, October.

Jimenez, E. C. & Csee, F. (2020). Motivating factors of teachers in developing supplementary learning materials (SLMs). International Journal of Advanced Research, 8(05), 108-113.

Kelley, T. & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence. Crown Publishing.

Ladachart, L., Radchanet, V., & Phothong, W. (2022). Design thinking mindsets facilitate students' learning of scientific concepts in design-based activities. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 1–16.

Ladachart, L., Radchanet, V., & Phothong, W. (2022). Design thinking mindsets facilitate students' learning of scientific concepts in design-based activities. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 1–16.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 16 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/she.v5i2.20977

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


SHE Journal managed and published by Universitas PGRI Madiun (UNIPMA), Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View My Stats