EVALUASI RISK MANAGEMENT BAHAYA PENCEMARAN GAS MUDAH TERBAKAR DAN BERACUN MELALUI IMPLEMNTASI SISTIM KESEHATAN DAN KESELAMATAN KERJA (K3) STUDI KASUS: PT XYZ OIL GAS COMPANY

Authors

  • Fauzi Khair Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Rahmat Sabani Universitas Bina Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25273/kaizen.v5i2.12512

Keywords:

evaluation, risk, oil gas, H2S and production

Abstract

The company's activities engaged in the oil and gas exploration and processing have many potential risks of work accidents in their business processes. Therefore, management and evaluation of risk management need to be carried out related to work activities. Especially those that have close proximity to methane gas as a combustible gas, and H2S gas as a toxic gas. The research was conducted in five divisions/departments in QATAR Oil Gas Company such as instrument, electrical, civil, mechanical, production and civil divisions. Each activity has a different level of risk, so it is required to measure the priority level of each. Based on the results, it was found that the production division has the most risk sources compared to other divisions as many as 17 sources and has the highest priority level. After the risk sources are identified and analyzed, a risk management proposal is designed by adjusting the type of activity and the risk. Management and application of personal protective equipment (PPE), SOP work procedures and fire extinguishers are one of the risk management proposals that must be adhered to as part of risk management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fauzi Khair, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Lecturer in BINUS University,

Focus Research: Optimization System, Supply Chain and Operation Research, Agent based Modelling, Health and Safety Management

References

D. K. Adjekum and M. F. Tous, “Assessing the relationship between organizational management factors and a resilient safety culture in a collegiate aviation program with Safety Management Systems (SMS),†Saf. Sci., vol. 131, no. March, p. 104909, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104909.

C. Benson, C. Dimopoulos, C. D. Argyropoulos, C. Varianou Mikellidou, and G. Boustras, “Assessing the common occupational health hazards and their health risks among oil and gas workers,†Saf. Sci., vol. 140, no. June 2020, p. 105284, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105284.

M. M. Asad, R. Bin Hassan, F. Sherwani, Q. M. Soomro, S. Sohu, and M. T. Lakhiar, “Oil and gas disasters and industrial hazards associated with drilling operation: An extensive literature review,†2019 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Math. Eng. Technol. iCoMET 2019, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673516.

O. T. Okareh, O. E. Solomon, and R. Olawoyin, “Prevalence of ergonomic hazards and persistent work-related musculoskeletal pain among textile sewing machine operators,†Saf. Sci., vol. 136, no. July 2019, p. 105159, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105159.

C. Rivera Domínguez, J. I. Pozos Mares, and R. G. Zambrano Hernández, “Hazard identification and analysis in work areas within the Manufacturing Sector through the HAZID methodology,†Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 145, pp. 23–38, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.07.049.

F. Han, Z. Wang, Y. Jiang, Y. Ji, and W. Li, “Energy assessment and external circulation design for LNG cold energy air separation process under four different pressure matching schemes,†Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 27, no. July, p. 101251, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101251.

B. Tan et al., “Status of research on hydrogen sulphide gas in Chinese mines,†Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 2502–2521, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07058-x.

Q. Deng, J. Yin, X. Wu, T. Zhang, H. Wang, and M. Liu, “Research Advances of Prevention and Control of Hydrogen Sulfide in Coal Mines,†Sci. World J., vol. 2019, no. 1975, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/8719260.

R. D. Noriyati, W. Rozaaq, A. Musyafa, and A. Soepriyanto, “Hazard & Operability Study and Determining Safety Integrity Level on Sulfur Furnace Unit: A Case Study in Fertilizer Industry,†Procedia Manuf., vol. 4, no. Iess, pp. 231–236, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.036.

R. D. Noriyati, A. B. Prakoso, A. Musyafa, and A. Soeprijanto, “HAZOP Study and Determination of Safety Integrity Level Using Fault Tree Analysis on Fuel Gas Superheat Burner of Ammonia Unit in Petrochemical Plant, East Java,†Asian J. Appl. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 396–409, 2017, doi: 10.24203/ajas.v5i2.4683.

M. K. Shad, F. W. Lai, C. L. Fatt, J. J. Klemeš, and A. Bokhari, “Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework,†J. Clean. Prod., vol. 208, pp. 415–425, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.120.

J. Jia and M. E. Bradbury, “Complying with best practice risk management committee guidance and performance,†J. Contemp. Account. Econ., vol. 16, no. 3, p. 100225, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100225.

S. Pawirosumarto, P. K. Sarjana, and R. Gunawan, “The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador hotels and resorts, Indonesia,†Int. J. Law Manag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1337–1358, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-10-2016-0085.

A. Kabyl, M. Yang, R. Abbassi, and S. Li, “A risk-based approach to produced water management in offshore oil and gas operations,†Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 139, pp. 341–361, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.021.

L. Torres, O. P. Yadav, and E. Khan, “A review on risk assessment techniques for hydraulic fracturing water and produced water management implemented in onshore unconventional oil and gas production,†Sci. Total Environ., vol. 539, pp. 478–493, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.030.

Downloads

Published

15-07-2022

Issue

Section

Articles