4.jpg)
REKOMENDASI PENJADWALAN PERAWATAN UNTUK MENGURANGI DOWNTIME PADA MESIN GLOSS CALENDAR II DENGAN METODE FMEA & MTBF
Abstract
PT ABC is a company that produces pulp and paper. The company works 24 hours and each machine is a continuous process. A reliable production system is important so that machines and other components can operate without being damaged during production. The problem is the damage that occurs at any time before the maintenance interval so it needs corrective maintenance. This research is limited to the gloss calendar II machine. To avoid corrective maintenance, optimal preventive maintenance actions are needed by determining maintenance intervals. This study aims to schedule preventive maintenance that minimizes downtime in the gloss calender II using MTBF and FMEA. After analyzing the causes of failure, an assessment and ranking of each cause of failure are carried out according to the severity and frequency of occurrence. The methods used are Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF). FMEA is a structured analysis method to identify and analyze various failure modes that occur in components, while MTBF is a method to find maintenance intervals. The result of this paper is a proposal for an ideal preventive maintenance time interval to reduce downtime on a gloss calendar machine using the FMEA & MTBF method.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. Garetti and M. Taisch, “Production Planning & Control : The Management of Operations Sustainable manufacturing : trends and research challenges,” Taylor Fr., no. June 2013, pp. 37–41, 2012.
S. Arita, D. Kristianti, and L. N. Komariah, “Effectiveness of biomass-based fly ash in pulp and paper liquid waste treatment,” South African J. Chem. Eng., vol. 41, no. May, pp. 79–84, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2022.05.004.
F. Nurprihatin, M. Angely, and H. Tannady, “JARIE_Volume 6_Issue 3_Pages 184-199,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 184–199, 2019, doi: 10.22105/jarie.2019.199037.1104.
A. Toppinen, S. Pätäri, A. Tuppura, and A. Jantunen, “The European pulp and paper industry in transition to a bio-economy: A Delphi study,” Futures, vol. 88, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.02.002.
Y. S. P. Chiu, K. K. Chen, and C. K. Ting, “Replenishment run time problem with machine breakdown and failure in rework,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1291–1297, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.005.
K. F. Rullifank, M. E. Roefinal, M. Kostanti, L. Sartika, and Evelyn, “Pulp and paper industry: An overview on pulping technologies, factors, and challenges,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 845, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/845/1/012005.
H. Ge, “Maintenance optimization for substations with aging equipment,” Electr. Eng. Theses Diss., p. 7, 2010.
A. Shrivastava, “A Preliminary study on reliability engineering and its evaluation,” no. January, pp. 3–6, 2013.
S. V. S. Rajaprasad, “Investigation of reliability, maintainability and availability of a paper machine in an integrated pulp and paper mill,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 43–56, 2018, doi: 10.4314/ijest.v10i3.5.
S. Wannawiset and S. Tangjitsitcharoen, “Paper Machine Breakdown Reduction by FMEA and Preventive Maintenance Improvement: A Case Study,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 530, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/530/1/012051.
K. D. Sharma and S. Srivastava, “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Implementation: A Literature Review,” Copyr. J. Adv. Res. Aeronaut. Sp. Sci. J Adv Res Aero SpaceSci, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2454–8669, 2018.
P. Alavian, Y. Eun, K. Liu, S. M. Meerkov, and L. Zhang, “The (α, β)-precise estimates of MTBF and MTTR: Definitions, calculations, and induced effect on machine efficiency evaluation,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 1004–1009, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.326.
P. Wang, J. Fan, and Z. Li, “Study on Mean Time between Failures Prediction Algorithms Based on Weibull Distribution,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 440, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/440/2/022083.
G. Mukondeleli Kanakana, “An integrated systems approach to engineering education throughput improvement using Lean Six Sigma,” no. November, 2012.
A. Sutrisno, I. Gunawan, and S. Tangkuman, “Modified Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Model for Accessing the Risk of Maintenance Waste,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 4, no. Iess, pp. 23–29, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.010.
I. N. Daulay, S. S. Nurutami, and D. D. Daniel, “Analisis Maintenance Reliability Terhadap Mtbf (Mean Time Between Failures) Facilities Pada Industri Pulp & Paper,” J. Ekon., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2013.
N. F. Fatma, H. Ponda, and R. A. Kuswara, “Analisis Preventive Maintenance Dengan Metode Menghitung Mean Time Between Failure (Mtbf) Dan Mean Time To Repair (Mttr) (Studi Kasus Pt. Gajah Tunggal Tbk),” Heuristic, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2020, doi: 10.30996/heuristic.v17i2.4648.
M. D. Ramere and O. T. Laseinde, “Optimization of condition-based maintenance strategy prediction for aging automotive industrial equipment using FMEA,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 180, pp. 229–238, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.160.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 343 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/kaizen.v5i2.12455
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial Office:
Lt.3 Kampus 3 Universitas PGRI Madiun
Jl. Auri no 14-16 Kecamatan Kartoharjo 63117
Kota Madiun
email : kaizen@unipma.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.