The Effect of Contextual Worksheets Assisted MEA Learning on Critical and Creative Thinking Ability

I Wayan Puja Astawa, I G A Sri Kusuma Sari, I Gusti Putu Sudiarta

Abstract


The ability to think critically and creatively is needed in solving math problems. Secondary school students in Indonesia still possess these two abilities according to the results of PISA research. Therefore, learning studies that influence these two abilities are still feasible to do. This study aims to examine the effect of MEA learning with contextual worksheets on the ability to think critically and creatively in solving math problems. The study was a quasi-experimental study using a post-test only control group design. The research population consisted of 137 class X students of SMK Kharisma Mengwi, Badung Regency, Bali for the 2019/2020 school year, which was spread into five classes with equivalent math abilities. A random sampling technique determined a sample of 2 classes. Data on the ability to think critically and creatively in solving mathematical problems were collected using a test in the form of a description. Data were analyzed using the MANOVA test. The results of the analysis show that MEA learning with contextual worksheets has a positive effect on the ability to think critically and creatively in solving math problems (F = 90.018; p <0.05).

Keywords


MEA; contextual worksheet; critical thinking; creative thinking; mathematical problem soving

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljaberi, N. M., & Gheith, E. (2015). University Students Level of Metacognitive Thinking and their Ability to Solve Problems. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(3), 121-134.

Boero, P., & Dapueto, C. (2007). Problem Solving in mathematics education in Italy: Dreams and reality. ZDM: the international journal on mathematics education, 39(5), 383-393.

Candiasa, I. M. (2010). Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat disertai Aplikasi SPSS. Singaraja: Penerbit Undiksha.

Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2008, November 24). How does the Problem Based Learning Approach Compare to the Model Eliciting Activity Approach in Mathematics? Retrieved July 1, 2019, from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/index.htm: http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/chamberlin.pdf

Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (2008). Describing 16 Habits of Mind. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from http://www.habits-of-minds.net/16HOM2.pdf

Darmojo, H., & Kaligis, J. R. (1992). Pendidikan IPA II. Jakarta: Depdikbud, Dirjen Dikti Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Daryanto, .. (2009). Panduan Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif. AV. Publisher, Jakarta.

Djamarah, S., & Zain, A. (2000). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Eggen, P., Wahono, S., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran: Mengajarkan Konten dan Keterampilan Berpikir. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Hanifah. (2015). Penerapan Pembelajaran Model Eliciting Activities (MEA) dengan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. KreanoJurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(2), 191-198.

Liberna, H. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Melalui Penggunaan Metode Improve Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. FORMATIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 2(3), 190-197.

Mahmuzah, R. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP melalui Pendekatan Problem Posing” Jurnal Peluang. Jurnal Peluang, 4(1), 64-72.

OECD. (2018). Programme For International Student Assessment(PISA) result From PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2018-Indonesia.pdf.

Permana, Y. (2010). Pengembangan Kemampuan Pemahaman, Komunikasi, dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Melalui Model Eliciting Activities. Bandung: Disertasi pada SPS UPI Bandung.

Rina, D. S., Rizky, E. U., & Nurfitriana, R. (2017). Keefektifan model eliciting activities (meas) Berbantu macromedia flash terhadap kemampuan Pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 170-175.

Ruseffendi, E. T. (1991). Pengantar Matematika Modern dan Masa Kini untuk Guru dan PGSD D2 Seri Kelima . Bandung: Tarito.

Sanjaya, W. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan Jenis, Metode dan Prosedur. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.

Santrock, J. W. (2011 ). Perkembangan Anak Edisi 7 Jilid 2. (Terjemahan: Sarah Genis B). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Shoidah, Z., Rachmadiarti, F., & Winarsih. (2012). Pengembangan LKS Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning Materi Hama dan Penyakit Tumbuhan. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 1(3), 8-12.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.

Wardhani, S., Wiworo, Guntoro, S. T., & Sasongko, H. W. (2010). Pembelajaran Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah matematika di SMP. PPPPTK Matematika. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika, Dirjen PMPTK Kemdiknas.

Yeni, R. (2010). Strategi Pengembangan Kreativitas pada Anak Usia Taman Kanak-kanak. Jakarta: Kencana.

Yunianta, T., Rusilowati, A., & Rohmad. (2012). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Implementasi Project Based Learning Dengan Peer And Self-Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 81-86.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 700 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.7405

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View JIPM Stats

 

JIPM indexed by:

       

Copyright of JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ISSN 2502-1745 (Online) and ISSN 2301-7929 (Print)