Trend Publication of Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: Bibliometric Review

Swasti Maharani, Vera Dewi Susanti, Tri Andari, Ika Krisdiana, Indra Puji Astuti

Abstract


Computational thinking and mathematics are closely related, namely mathematics plays a role in overcoming challenges and understanding concepts in computational thinking, while computational thinking ultimately simplifies and abstracts situations by formulating and presenting problems in mathematical form. The purpose of this study is to identify trends and research patterns with the topic of computational thinking in mathematics education using bibliometric analysis. Data is obtained from the dimensions database which has been refined through 4 stages (identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion). The results showed that the peak of publications related to computational thinking in mathematics education research occurred in 2022. The Journal of Science of Education and Technology became the most influential journal with the most citations, namely 877 citations even though it only with 7 publications. The United States is the most influential country in this field because of the good number of publications, the number of citations is the highest of any other country. There are three research focuses related to computational thinking in mathematics education research on the dimensions database from 2013-2023, namely, 1) mathematics, study, teacher; 2) problem, child, learning; 3) student, steam, CT skill

Keywords


Computational thinking; Bibliometric; Mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apriani, A., Ismarmiaty, I., Susilowati, D., Kartarina, K., & Suktiningsih, W. (2021). Penerapan Computational Thinking pada Pelajaran Matematika di Madratsah Ibtidaiyah Nurul Islam Sekarbela Mataram. ADMA : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 1(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.30812/adma.v1i2.1017

Basson, I. (2021). Twenty years into the new millennium: How integrated is Mathematics, Physics and Computer Science at secondary school level? Perspectives in Education, 39(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i4.2

Evendi, E. (2022). Mathematical Thinking Styles and Its Implications in Science Learning: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1720

Huda, N., Misbah, M., Miriam, S., Harto, M., Rusmansyah, R., Hamid, A., & Muhammad, N. (2023). ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK: TREN PENELITIAN BERPIKIR KREATIF. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 14(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v14i1.14387

Lee, I. (2020). Computational Thinking Integration Patterns Along the Framework Defining Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09802-x

Lee, J., Joswick, C., & Pole, K. (2022). Classroom Play and Activities to Support Computational Thinking Development in Early Childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(3), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01319-0

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020a). Computational thinking pemecahan masalah di abad ke-21. Madiun: Perpustakan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT).

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020b). Computational thinking pemecahan masalah di abad ke-21. Madiun: Perpustakan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT).

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational thinking: Media pembelajaran CSK (CT-Sheet for Kids) dalam matematika PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 975–984.

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving Mathematics Teaching in Kindergarten with Realistic Mathematical Education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4

Pardo, A. S. (2018). Computational Thinking between Philosophy and STEM - Programming Decision Making Applied to the Behavior of “Moral Machines” in Ethical Values Classroom. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 13(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2018.2809940

Reichert, J. T. (2020). Computational thinking in K-12: An analysis with mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7832

Rich, K. M. (2022). A Learning Trajectory for Variables Based in Computational Thinking Literature: Using Levels of Thinking to Develop Instruction. Computer Science Education, 32(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1866938

Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: An experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448

Sung, W., Ahn, J., & Black, J. B. (2017). Introducing Computational Thinking to Young Learners: Practicing Computational Perspectives Through Embodiment in Mathematics Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9328-x

Tang, K. (2020). A Content Analysis of Computational Thinking Research: An International Publication Trends and Research Typology. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00442-8

Wu, W.-R., & Yang, K.-L. (2022). The relationships between computational and mathematical thinking: A review study on tasks. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2098929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2098929

Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w

Yuntawati, Y., Sanapiah, S., & Aziz, L. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Computational Thinking Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v9i1.3898

Zhang, Y., & Savard, A. (2023). Defining Computational Thinking as an Evident Tool in Problem-Solving: Comparative Research on Chinese and Canadian Mathematics Textbooks. ECNU Review of Education, 209653112311583. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231158393


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 361 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i1.17654

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View JIPM Stats

 

JIPM indexed by:

       

Copyright of JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ISSN 2502-1745 (Online) and ISSN 2301-7929 (Print)