Development of Quizizz-Based Interactive Questions to Measure Scientific Reasoning Skills

Adam Malik, Yusuf Setiawan, Winda Setya

Abstract


This study aims to determine the feasibility level, students' scientific reasoning abilities, and students' responses to the use of quizizz-based interactive questions in measuring students' scientific reasoning skills. This research method uses the 4D model (Define, Design, Development, and Dissemination). The results showed that quizizz-based interactive questions to measure scientific reasoning skills developed were declared very feasible by the validators at a percentage of 82.6%. The results of the percentage of students' scientific reasoning skills on conservation reasoning indicators are 25%, probabilistic reasoning 20.83%, proportional reasoning 8.33%, correlation reasoning 4.17%, variable reasoning 8.33%, and hypothesis-deductive reasoning 12.50 %. The question has positive response criteria as seen from the results of the assessment of students by 88% with very interesting interpretations. Thus, it can be concluded that quizizz-based interactive questions to measure scientific reasoning skills are very feasible to use and get a positive response from students.

Keywords


Interactive questions; Quizizz; Scientific reasoning skills;.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Faizah, W., & Aminah, N. (2019). Analysis of Student Concepts Understanding in Solving Scientific Literacy on the Topic of Momentum and Impulse. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Anas, S. (2008). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bryce, T., & MacMillan, K. (2009). Momentum and kinetic energy: Confusable concepts in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 739-761.

Bujuri, D. A. (2018). Analisis perkembangan kognitif anak usia dasar dan implikasinya dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar. LITERASI (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan), 9(1), 37-50.

Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student's perception in the classrooms response system. Paper presented at the 2017 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT).

Darmawan, I. G. N., Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Van Deur, P., & Wyra, M. (2020). The development of an instrument to test pre‐service teachers’ beliefs consistent and inconsistent with self‐regulation theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1039-1061.

Darmawan, R. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta. Hal, 24.

Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45-52.

Ding, L., Wei, X., & Liu, X. (2016). Variations in university students’ scientific reasoning skills across majors, years, and types of institutions. Research in Science Education, 46(5), 613-632.

Effendy, S., Hartono, Y., & Ian, M. (2018). The Ability of Scientific Reasoning and Mastery of Physics Concept of State Senior High School Students in Palembang City. vol, 247, 504-509.

Erlina, N., & Susantini, E. (2018). Common False of Student’s Scientific Reasoning in Physics Problems. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K. (2019). Analisis Kesukaran Soal, Daya Pembeda dan Fungsi Distraktor. Al-Manar, 8(2), 37-64.

Fitriyani, S., Hertanti, E., & Nurlaela, A. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Drill Berbantuan Soal Animasi terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Pada Konsep Dinamika Partikel. Paper presented at the PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL FISIKA (E-JOURNAL).

Fulmer, G. W., Chu, H.-E., Treagust, D. F., & Neumann, K. (2015). Is it harder to know or to reason? Analyzing two-tier science assessment items using the Rasch measurement model. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1(1), 1. doi: 10.1186/s41029-015-0005-x

Göksün, D. O., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15-29.

Hamzah, A. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika: Rajawali Pers.

Han, J. (2013). Scientific reasoning: Research, development, and assessment. The Ohio State University.

Jelicic, K., Planinic, M., & Planinsic, G. (2017). Analyzing high school students’ reasoning about electromagnetic induction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010112.

Jensen, J. L., Neeley, S., Hatch, J. B., & Piorczynski, T. (2017). Learning scientific reasoning skills may be key to retention in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(2), 126-144.

Kant, J. M., Scheiter, K., & Oschatz, K. (2017). How to sequence video modeling examples and inquiry tasks to foster scientific reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 52, 46-58.

Khoshsima, H., & Hashemi Toroujeni, S. (2017). Comparability of Computer-Based Testing and Paper-Based Testing: Testing mode effect, testing mode order, computer attitudes and testing mode preference. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 24(1), 80-99.

Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 19(9), 743-760.

Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716-740.

Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., & Xie, W. (2014). Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 43-54.

Malik, A., & Agustina, R. D. (2020). Review Pengaruh Teknologi Gamification Terhadap Psikologis Siswa. JICTE (Journal of Information and Computer Technology Education), 4(1).

Marušić, M., & Sliško, J. (2012). Influence of three different methods of teaching physics on the gain in students' development of reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 301-326.

Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2019). Making the psychological dimension of learning visible: using technology-based assessment to monitor students’ cognitive development. Front. Psychol. 10, 1368 (2019).

Moore, J. C., & Rubbo, L. J. (2012). Scientific reasoning abilities of nonscience majors in physics-based courses. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010106.

Moraes, J. d., Castellar, S. M. V., Castellar, S., & Castellar, S. (2010). Scientific literacy, problem based learning and citizenship: a suggestion for geography studies teaching. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 19, 119-127.

Mukhlis, M., & Tohir, M. (2019). Instrumen Pengukur Creativity And Innovation Skills Siswa Sekolah Menengah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(1), 65-73.

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241-1248. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025

Nurjanah, N. (2017). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda dari Aspek Kebahasaan. Faktor: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(1), 69-78.

Opitz, A., Heene, M., & Fischer, F. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning – a review of test instruments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3-4), 78-101. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2017.1338586

Piaget, J. (2003). The psychology of intelligence: Routledge.

Prasetiyo, N. A., & Perwiraningtyas, P. (2017). The development of environment based textbook in biology course at Tribhuwana Tunggadewi University. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 3(1), 19-27.

Purba, L. S. L. (2019). Peningkatan konsentrasi belajar mahasiswa melalui pemanfaatan evaluasi pembelajaran quizizz pada mata kuliah kimia fisika I. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(1), 29-39.

Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in human behavior, 63, 50-58.

Setiyoningtyas, R., & Kasmui. (2020). Pengembangan quizizz-assisted test berbasis literasi sains pada materi larutan elektrolit nonelektrolit. Chemistry in Education, 2.

Sholekhah, F., Maharta, N., & Suana, W. (2018). Development of Higher Thinking Instrument of Newton ‘S Laws of Motion. Journal of Physics and Science Learning, 2(1), 17-26.

Solikah, H. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Quizizz terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Teks Persuasif Kelas VIII di SMPN 5 Sidoarjo Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. BAPALA, 7(3).

Subiki, S., & Supriadi, B. (2018). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Jember Pada Pokok Bahasan Dinamika. FKIP e-PROCEEDING, 3(1), 121-126.

Xiao, Y., Han, J., Koenig, K., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2018). Multilevel Rasch modeling of two-tier multiple choice test: A case study using Lawson’s classroom test of scientific reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020104.

Xu, B., Tu, S., Qiao, S., Qu, X., Chen, Y., Yang, J., . . . Tian, F. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 70(25), 3077-3087.

Yuksel, I., & Ates, S. (2018). Examination of the relationship between preservice science teachers’ scientific reasoning and problem solving skills on basic mechanics. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1).

Zhou, S.-N., Liu, Q.-Y., Koenig, K., Li, Q., & Bao, L. (2021). Analysis Of Two-Tier Question Scoring Methods: A Case Study On The Lawson’s Classroom Test Of Scientific Reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 146.

Zhou, S., Han, J., Koenig, K., Raplinger, A., Pi, Y., Li, D., . . . Bao, L. (2016). Assessment of scientific reasoning: The effects of task context, data, and design on student reasoning in control of variables. Thinking skills and creativity, 19, 175-187.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 580 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v7i1.9474

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK) Indexed by :

 

Office:
Universitas PGRI Madiun
Jl. Setiabudi No. 85 Kota Madiun 63118
Lt 2 Office Physics Education
email : jpfk@unipma.ac.id


Copyright Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFKISSN 2442-8868 (printed) , ISSN  2442-904X (online)
real
time web analyticsView My Stat