Miskonsepsi gaya gesek pada mahasiswa

Yuant Tiandho

Abstract


Pada makalah ini dilakukan evaluasi pemahaman mahasiswa tingkat awal terkait konsep gaya gesek yang telah mereka pelajari ketika di sekolah menengah atas. Berdasarkan pengujian awal dapat diketahui bahwa kebanyakan mahasiswa masih mengalami miskonsepsi terkait konsep gaya gesek, khususnya dalam konsep gaya gesek statis. Tingginya miskonsepsi mahasiswa terkait gaya gesek statis  disebabkan oleh banyaknya literatur yang merumuskan gaya gesek statis secara tidak tepat yaitu sebagai perkalian dari koefisien gesek statis dengan gaya normalnya yang bernilai konstan. Selain itu, ungkapan matematis dari gaya gesek statis yang menggunakan simbol ketidaksamaan meningkatkan potensi miskonsepsi karena dirasa lebih sulit oleh mahasiswa seperti dinyatakan dalam penelitian Handhika, et al. (2015). Melalui pengajaran dengan  rumusan gaya gesek statis yang benar menggunakan metode analogi, mahasiswa dapat memahami konsep gaya gesek dan implikasinya secara lebih baik dari sebelumnya. Sehingga dari penelitian ini diharapkan guru menggunakan buku teks yang memberikan deskripsi yang benar tentang gaya gesek.


Keywords


miskonsepsi; gaya gesek statis; mekanika klasik

Full Text:

PDF

References


De Ambrosis, A., Malgieri, M., Mascheretti, P., & Onorato, P. (2015). Investigating the role of sliding friction in rolling motion: a teaching sequence based on experiments and simulations. European Journal of Physics, 36(3), p. 035020.

Amontons, G. (1699). De la resistance cause'e dans les machines. Mem l'Academie RA, pp. 257-282.

Apriliani, S., Budiarti, I. & Lumbu, A.(2015). Penggunaan analogi dalam pembelajaran fisika melalui metode eksperimen topik aliran arus listrik untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa kelas X SMA YPPK Taruna Dharma Kotaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan, 1(1), pp. 14-19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v1i1.7

Balci, S. & Cakiroglu, J. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), pp. 199-203.

Besson, U. (2013). Historical scientific models and theories as resources for learning and teaching: the case of friction. Science & Education, 22(5), pp. 1001-1042.

Blass, J. et al., (2015). Dynamic effects in friction and adhesion through cooperative rupture and formation of supramolecular bonds. Nanoscale, 7(17), pp. 7674-7681.

Bryce, T. & MacMillan, K. (2005). Encouraging conceptual change: the use of bridging analogies in the teaching of action-reaction forces and the ‘at rest’ condition in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (6), pp. 737-763.

Cepni, S., Sahin, C. & Ipek, H. (2010). Teaching floating and sinking concepts with different methods and techniques based on the 5E instructional model. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2), pp. 1-39.

Chia, T.C. (1996). Common misconceptions in frictional force among university physics students. Teaching and Learning, 16(2), pp.107-116.

Clement, J., Brown, E. & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding 'anchoring conceptions' for grounding instruction on students intuitions. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11(5), pp. 554-565.

Coulomb, C. (1773). Sur une application des regles de maximis & minimis a quelques problemes de statique, relatifs a I'architecture. Memoires de Mathematique & de Physique, presentes a I' Academie. Royale des Sciences par divers Savans, & Ius dans ses Assemblees, Volume 7, pp. 343-382.

Esvandiari, E. (2007). Kumpulan Lengkap Rumus Fisika SMA. Jakarta: Puspa Swara.

Grayson, D. (2004). Concept substitution: A teaching strategy for helping students disentangle related physics concepts. Am. J. Phys., 72(8), pp. 1126-1133.

Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: multiple perpectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and a appropriate role for education research. Am. J. Phys., 64(10), pp. 1316-1325.

Handhika, J., Cari, Suparmi & Sunarno, W. (2015). External representation to overcome misconception in physics. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE 2015), pp. PE-34-37.

Handhika, J., Suparmi, S., & Cari, C. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Hukum Columb. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 1(1), 29-34. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v1i1.10

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D. & Kelley, E. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Phys. Educ., 34(5), pp. 294-299.

Izati, N. (2014). Pintar dan Juara Fisika SMA. Jakarta: PandaMedia.

Kudra, G. & Awrejcewicz, J. (2016). A smooth model of the resultant friction force on a plane contact area. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 54(3), pp. 909-919.

Lin, S. & Singh, C. (2011). Challenges in using analogies. The Physics Teacher, 49(8), pp. 512-513.

Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Philadelphia: Open Univesity Press.

Ortiz, S., Rebello, N., Zollman, D. & Achach, M. (2003). The vocabulary of introductory physics and its implications for learning physics. The Phys. Teach., 41(6), pp. 41-46.

Pinarbasi, T., Canpolat, N., Bayrakceken, S. & Geban, O. (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students understanding of solution concepts. Research on Science Education, 36(4), pp. 331-335.

Popova, E. & Popov, V. (2015). The research works of Coulomb and Amontons and generalized laws of friction. Friction, 3(2), pp. 183-190.

Redish, E., Scherr, R. & Tuminaro, J. (2006). Reverse-engineering the solution of a "simple" physics problem: why learning physics is harder than it looks. The Phys. Teach., 44(5), pp. 293-300.

Sharma, S. & Sharma, K. (2007). Concepts of force and frictional force: the influence of preconceptions on learning across different levels. Physics Education, 42(5), pp. 516-521.

Sugiyono, V. (2009). Jurus Sakti Menaklukkan Fisika SMA 1, 2, & 3. Surabaya: LinguaKata.

Supomo, T. (2007). Panduan UNAS Fisika SMA. Pustaka Widyatama: Yogyakarta.

Syuhendri, S., Jaafar, R., & Yahya, R. A. S. (2014). Analysis of Physics Education Department Students' Misconceptions on Other Influences on Motion.

Tiandho, Y., (2016). Modifikasi distribusi massa pada suatu objek simetri bola. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika IV(2), pp. 76-85.

Trianggono, M. (2017). Analisis Kausalitas Pemahaman Konsep Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Pada Pemecahan Masalah Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 3(1), 1-12. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v3i1.874

Young, H., Freedman, R. & Ford, A. (2012). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics. 13th ed. USA: Addison-Wesley.

Yuruk, N. (2007). The effect of supplementing instruction with conceptual change texts on student's conceptions of electrochemical cells. Journal of Science Education Technology, 16(6), pp. 515-523.


Article Metrics

Abstract has been read : 2563 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times


DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v4i1.1814

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK) Indexed by :

 

Office:
Universitas PGRI Madiun
Jl. Setiabudi No. 85 Kota Madiun 63118
Lt 2 Office Physics Education
email : jpfk@unipma.ac.id


Copyright Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFKISSN 2442-8868 (printed) , ISSN  2442-904X (online)
real
time web analyticsView My Stat