Reader Comments

Forex Millennium

by princy william (2019-06-12)

Market making banks that lack Forex Millennium Review resource to develop their own aggregated trading platforms can either outsource developing task or opt for white-labeling solutions. The choice generally depends on the proportion of their high frequency and low frequency customers. However, the biggest challenge they face is that the existing electronic infrastructure and aggregation system available provide limited flexibility and customization. Control in Dealings Some trading firms and market making banks prefer developing their own trading platforms based on their business strategies and risk appetite. In-house developed platforms provide them better control over their dealings. However, it is important to analyze the cost and return benefits of building an in-house platform. To keep up with the arms race, third party providers have started investing and building faster technologies and products that enable banks to provide different executable pricing streams to different customers based on their needs and trading motives. Speed and Capacity Speed of execution becomes a critical factor due to the ever increasing use of algorithmic trading. Increasing ticket volumes challenges banks and liquidity providers to get their prices out in the market fast enough and confirm trades at the rate at which they are being traded. While several banks continue spending heavily on their websites to keep it updated, internet lack capacity, cannot be scaled easily and can have security issues. Introduction of Black box trading has resulted in an increase in small ticket trading thus increasing trading frequency. As the number of tickets traded increases, it creates a real capacity constraint and cost pressures for banks and brokers. Not having enough capacity can further create latency issues. Developing solutions that takes care of both pre-trade and post-trade execution issues may not be cost-effective for banks and trading institutions.