REPRESENTATION OF MUTUAL TERMS AND RESEARCH SKILLS TOWARDS GRADE POINT AVERAGE: EXPLORATION STUDY

Hasan Subekti; Wachidatul Linda Yuhanna; Herawati Susilo; Ibrohim Ibrohim; Hadi Suwono

doi:10.25273/florea.v5i1.2500

REPRESENTATION OF MUTUAL TERMS AND RESEARCH SKILLS TOWARDS GRADE POINT AVERAGE: EXPLORATION STUDY

Hasan Subekti, Wachidatul Linda Yuhanna, Herawati Susilo, Ibrohim Ibrohim, Hadi Suwono

Abstract

Research activities have been studied extensively to improve the quality of learning, especially in higher education. This research aims to explore the mastery of the term of research ( TR or IR ) and research skills (RS or KR) of toward of grade point average (GPA or IPK). This research uses a quantitative approach to the object of students in natural science education program a number of 67 people who follow biotechnology courses academic year 2017/2018. Data collection with tests and aggregation of documentation. Data analysis technique is done by quantitative descriptive analysis. The decision indicates that the exact number of IR is 66.0 (easy category) and KS is 65.8 (short category). The result of correlation analysis shows 𝐹𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡 = 6,147˃ 3,140 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 = (0,05;2;64) or in other words there a relationship of IR and KR collectively to GPA. This study concludes that there is a significant correlation between IR and KR guards in the same period as the GPA. Based on the investigation, it is expected to provide benefits as one of the considerations for the selection and determination of learning mods related to learning. It is expected to be useful as a consideration for the selection and determination of study-related modes for improvement.

Keywords

Research term, research placement, exploration

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adisendjaja, Y. H., Rustaman, N. Y., Redjeki, S., & Satori, D. (2017). Science teachers’ understanding of scientific inquiry in teacher professional development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1-8. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012054.

Akpan, B. (2017). Science Education: A Global Perspective. Switzerland: Springer.

Anggraeni, N., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Amprasto, A. (2017). Profile of high school students’ understanding of scientific inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 1-5. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012138.

Bang, L. (2018). The inquiry of the cyclops: dewey’s scientific inquiry Revisited. In K. Otrel-Cass (Ed.), Cultural, Social, and Political Perspectives in Science Education (Vol. 15, pp. 49-67). London: Springer International Publishing.

Berry, C. M. (2017). A technique for inspiring scientific inquiry using a creative scenario. The American Biology Teacher, 79(8), 671-677. doi:10.1525/ abt.2017.79.8.671.

Corebima, A. D. (2016). Pembelajaran Biologi di Indonesia Bukan untuk Hidup. Paper presented at the Biology Education Conference, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta. https://jurnal.uns. ac.id/prosbi/article/viewFile/564/5008.

Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DRPM). (2018). Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Edisi XII. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan, Kemristekdikti.

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1). doi:10.15294/ jpii.v6i1.7245.

Hanauer, D. I., Hatfull, G. F., & Jacobs-Sera, D. (2009). Active Assessment: Assessing Scientific Inquiry (Vol. 2). New York: Springer Science.

Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., Martini, & Budiyanto, M. (2014). Buku Prototipe Kurikulum Pendidikan Sains Berorientasi KKNI. Surabaya: UNESA Press.

Kapon, S. (2016). Doing research in school: Physics inquiry in the zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1172-1197. doi:10.1002/tea.21325.

Kemristekdikti. (2018a). Pengembangan Iptek dan Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.ristekdikti.go.id/pengembangan-iptek-dan-pendidikan-tinggi-di-era-revolusi-industri-4-0/.

Kemristekti. (2018b). Presiden Jokowi: Tantangan Kita ke Depan, Revolusi Industri 4.0.

Kemenristekdikti. (2018c). Kebijakan Kemenristekdikti Menghadapi Globalisasi Pendidikan & Revolusi Industri 4.0 [Press release].

Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: Instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-27. doi:10.1080/ 02635143.2017.1421530.

Kuo, C.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Development and validation of a multimedia-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2326-2357.doi:10.1080/09500693.2015 .078521.

Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., Jimenez Pavez, J., Lavonen, J., Blanquet, E., Yalaki, Y. (2017). Understandings of scientific inquiry: An international collaborative investi-gation of seventh grade student. Paper presented at the ESERA 2017 Conference, Dubin City University, Irelend. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/322603295.

Lederman, N.G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science and Education, 23(2), 285-302. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9503 -3.

Masfingatin, T., Murtafi’ah, W., & Krisdiana, I. (2017). Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Profesional dan Melatihkan Self Regulated Learning pada Mata Kuliah Geometri (pp. 1-50). Universitas PGRI Madiun: Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (DRPM).

Mukaka, M. M. (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal; 24(3): September, 24(3), 69-71 Retrieved from

Nowak, K. H., Nehring, A., Tiemann, R., & Belzen, U. z. A. (2013). Assessing students’ abilities in processes of scientific inquiry in biology using a paper-and-pencil test. Journal of Biological Education, 47(3), 182-188. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013. 822747.

Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The development of guided inquiry science learning materials to improve science literacy skill of prospective MI teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 83-93. doi:10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5794.

Schaub, G., Cadena, C., Bravender, P., & Kierkus, C. (2016). The Language of Information Literacy:Do Students Understand?. Allendale, Michigan: Grand Valley State University.

Subekti, H., & Martini. (2016). Representasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Penelitian pada Mata Kuliah Bioteknologi dan Salingtemas dalam Menumbuhkan Budaya Akademik di Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Unesa. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional IPA VII Di Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.

Sudira, P. (2015). Pengembangan Model “Lis-5c” pada Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(1), 1-11. doi:10.21831/cp.v1i1.4145

Sugiono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (4ed. ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of Students’ Biological Literacy and Critical Thinking of Biology Through Socio-Biological Case-Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), (213-220. doi:DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v6i2. 9622.

Widodo, W. (2016). Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA Berdasarkan Permintaan Kognitf (Cognitive Demand) Pisa:Bagaimana Langkah Selanjutnya? Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA VII, FMIPA UNESA

Yang, W., & Liu, E. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquiry-based tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18), 1-25. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016. 1258499.

Yeh, Y.-F., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2012). Major strands in scientific inquiry through cluster analysis of research abstracts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2811-2842. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.663513