Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Peserta didik SMA Negeri 6 Bandar Lampung Terhadap Tingkat Level Soal Materi Larutan Penyangga
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Affeldt, F., Meinhart, D., & Eilks, I. (2018). The Use of Comics in Experimental
Instructions in a Non-formal Chemistry Learning Context. International Journal of
Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 93–104.
Atkins P.W. (2005). Skeletal chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 42, 20, 25; see also:
http://www.rsc.org/ Education/EiC/issues/2005_Jan/skel etal.asp.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental Measurement in
the Human Sciences (Third Edit). Routledge.
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences.
Springer.
Bybee R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: from purposes to practice. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Cardellini, L. (2000). Chemistry Education: Research And Practice in Europe, 1(1), 151-
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary
meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2017). Panduan Implementasi
Kecakapan Abad 21 Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta:
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Fibonacci, A., Azizati, Z., & Wahyudi, T. (2020). Development Of Education For
Sustainable Development (ESD) Based Chemsdro Mobile Learning For Indonesian
Junior High School : Rate of Reaction. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 1(Juni), 26–34.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a Measure
of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Science Education, 98(4), 549–580.
Holman J. (2002). What does it mean to be chemically literate? Education in Chemistry,
, 12-14.
Khine, M. S. (2020). Rasch Measurement Application in Quantitative Educational
Research (M. S. Khine (ed.)). Springer.
Lederman, N.G. (2014). Nature of science and its fundamental important to the vision of
the next generation science standars. Science & Children, 8-10.
Lestari, A. S., & Samsudin, A. (2020). Using Rasch Model Analysis to Analyze Students‟
Scientific Literacy on Heat and Temperature. Proceedings of the 7th
Mathemnatics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar.
Millar,R. & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future, Report of a
seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. London, UK: King‟s College.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Odja, A. H., & Payu, C. S. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Mahasiswa
Pada Konsep IPA. Education and Human Development Journal, 1(1), 40–47.
OECD. (2001). “PISA 2000 Result in Focus: What 15 year olds know and what they can
do with what they know”. http://www.Oecd.Org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2000-
results.
OECD. (2004). “PISA 2003 Result in Focus: What 15 year olds know and what they can
do with what they know”. http://www.Oecd.Org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2003-
results.
OECD. (2007). Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World Volume 1- Analysis, PISA.
OECD Publishing: Paris.
OECD. (2010). Assesing framework key competencies in reading, mathematics, and science.
OECD Publishing: Paris.
OECD. (2013). “PISA 2012 Result in Focus: What 15 year olds know and what they can
do with what they know”. http://www.Oecd.Org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-
results.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA.
OECD Publishing: Paris.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being, PISA. OECD
Publishing: Paris.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing: Paris.
Ratcliffe, M. and Millar, R. (2009). Teaching for understanding of science in context:
evidence from the pilot trials of the Twenty First Century Science courses. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 945–959.
Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/ science literacy: threats and opportunities. in Abell S. K.
and Lederman N. G. (ed.), Handbook of research on science education, Mahwah. New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosnawati, R. (2013). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa SMP Indonesia pada
TIMSS 2011. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA,
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 2(1), 203-213.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee S. (2004). Science Education as/for participation in the community.
Science Education, 88, 263-291.
Shwartz Y., Ben-Zvi R. and Hofstein A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school
chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of „chemical
literacy‟. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323–344.
Shwartz Y., Ben-Zvi R. and Hofstein A. (2006a). Chemical literacy: what it means to
scientists and school teachers?. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1557-1561.
Shwartz Y., Bez-Zvi R. and Hofstein A. (2006b). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy
for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students.
Chemistry Education Research & Practice, 7(4), 203–225.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The Use of Scientific Literacy Taxonomy
for Assessing the Development of Chemical Literacy among High-school Students.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225.
Shwartz, Y., Dori, Y. J., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). How to Outline Objectives for
Chemistry Education and how to Assess Them Teaching Chemistry–A Studybook
(pp. 37-65): Springer. PMid:23032358.
Sumintono, B., dan Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment
Pendidikan. Cimahi: Penerbit Trim Kominikata Publishing House.
TIMSS & PIRL.(2016). Trends International Mathematics and Science Study. Tersedia di
https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/
Ummah, M., Rusilowati, A., & Yulianti, I. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis
Literasi Sains Materi Gelombang Cahaya. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(3),
–57.
Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2013). Preservice chemistry teachers in action: An evaluation of
attempts for changing high school students‟ chemistry misconceptions into more
scientific conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 95–104.
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 1263 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v10i2.12119
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Eduaksi Matematika dan Sains (JEMS) terindeks oleh :
View JEMS Stats