Dispute Settlement of International Trademark on Intellectual Property Rights (Case Study: Decision Number 557 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2016)
Abstract
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), namely rights resulting from the impact of thought patterns resulting in products that are beneficial to legal subjects. However, there are still many problems that arise in IPR such as brand theft, brand plagiarism and so on. One of them is the case of Laverana, a cosmetic product from Germany. This brand was plagiarized by Irawan Gunawan to be used as a product brand in Indonesia. On top of these things, Laverana also felt disadvantaged. Therefore, this article aims to provide an understanding of the importance of protecting IPR and how to resolve international trademark disputes. The research method used in this research itself is a normative-empirical legal research method and a literature approach as well as legal protection theory and effectiveness theory in this brand plagiarism dispute case. The resolution of the Intellectual Property Rights dispute in the Laverana case was pursued through litigation, namely the Indonesian court to try the defendant, namely Irawan Gunawan. The final decision obtained from the court stated that the party from Germany or the original owner of the Laverana Brand won. This resulted in Irawan Gunawan (defendant) having to withdraw from the brand and being charged legal fees of Rp. 5,000,000 (5 Million Rupiah).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Indonesia. Law (UU) Number 7 of 1994 concerning Ratification of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. LN. 1994/ No. 57, TLN NO. 3564.
________. Law (UU) Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. 1999/ No. 138, TLN NO. 3872.
________. Law (UU) Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. LN. 2016/NO.252, TLN NO.5953. Amendments to Law no. 15 of 2001 concerning Brands. LN. 2016/NO.110, TLN No. 4131.
________. Code of Civil law
Aminah. (2019). Pilihan Hukum dalam Kontrak Perdata. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 4(2).
Aprita, S., & Adhitya, R. (2020). Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dewi, M. L., Ardhya, S. N., & Dantes, K. F. (2023). Peran Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional Di Laut Cina Selatan. JURNAL KOMUNITAS YUSTISIA, 5(2).
Fajriawati. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Melalui Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi Di Medan. SOSEK Jurnal Sosial Dan Ekonomi, 2(3).
Firmansyah, M. A. (2019). Buku Pemasaran Produk dan Merek. CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.
Gratia Gijoh, L. G. (2021). Implementasi Hukum Dalam Kontrak Bisnis Internasional. . Lex Et Societatis, 9(1).
Khaerunisa, dkk. (2023). Analysis of the Explosion of the Pertamina Plumpang Depo in Review From Government Regulation No. 14 of 2015 Concerning the National Development Master Plan. Universitas PGRI Madiun.
Harsyah, J. R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Melalui Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Universitas Nasional.
Hasudungan, S. E. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Indonesia Dengan Uni Eropa Perihal Larangan Ekspor Bijih Nikel Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdagangan Internasional (Kasus Ekspor Bijih Nikel Dalam Perkara Nomor DS592). Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Masnun, M. A. (2019). Reorientasi Pengaturan Pemberdayaan Hukum Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Melalui Hak atas Merek Kolektif. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2).
Matulessy, M. F. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Merek Terkenal Terkait Dengan Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 332 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Muliasari, R. S., Santoso, B., & Irawati. (2021). Pelanggaran Prinsip Itikad Baik dalam Sengketa Merek Internasional. NOTARIUS, 14(2).
Namang, R. B. (2020). Negara Dan Warga Negara Perspektif Aristoteles. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 4(2).
Nasrudin, J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan . Terbit Panca Terra Firma.
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa . Kencana
Suherman, A. (2019). Implementasi Independensi Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1).
Wijaya, M. M. (2022). Pemberian Remisi Bagi Koruptor Dikaitkan Dengan Komitmen Pemerintah Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 8(4).
Article Metrics
Abstract has been read : 38 timesPDF file viewed/downloaded: 0 times
DOI: http://doi.org/10.25273/ay.v4i1.19241
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Arkianti Anindita Putri, Dewi Ratnadewanti, Kamila Khaerunisa, Sheikha Dwi Nabilla, Nadia Rastika Alam, Mustika Mega Wijaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Office:
Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas PGRI Madiun
email : activayuris@unipma.ac.id